Promoting Chinese Students’ Creative Performance Through Collaborative Reasoning

IF 2.7 Q1 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH ECNU Review of Education Pub Date : 2023-04-25 DOI:10.1177/20965311231168419
Shufeng Ma (马淑风), Qiannan Zhou (周茜楠), Yaguang Li (李亚光), Senyu Chen (陈森宇)
{"title":"Promoting Chinese Students’ Creative Performance Through Collaborative Reasoning","authors":"Shufeng Ma (马淑风), Qiannan Zhou (周茜楠), Yaguang Li (李亚光), Senyu Chen (陈森宇)","doi":"10.1177/20965311231168419","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Creativity is highly valued by modern society; however, in China, there is a major challenge in creating school-based curricula or courses that promote students’ creativity. This study introduced an interactive learning format called Collaborative Reasoning (CR). The goal was to investigate whether CR would improve a student's ability to generate creative ideas. The data comprised 474 seventh graders from eight classes in a rural middle school in northern China. The eight classes were randomly assigned to two conditions: Four classes participated in CR discussions, and the remaining four classes were taught via teacher-directed Chinese reading classes. After participating in the CR discussions, students completed a Realistic Presented Problem test that was designed to evaluate their creative performance. The results indicated that compared to the control students, CR students generated more effective solutions (fluency) and proposed a greater variety of solutions (flexibility) to three realistic problems. The solutions proposed by the CR students were more unique (novelty) and more useful in real-life situations (usefulness) than those proposed by the control group. Providing abundant opportunities for the exchange of ideas in a social context can boost students’ performance in creative problem-solving.","PeriodicalId":33103,"journal":{"name":"ECNU Review of Education","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-25","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"ECNU Review of Education","FirstCategoryId":"95","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/20965311231168419","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Creativity is highly valued by modern society; however, in China, there is a major challenge in creating school-based curricula or courses that promote students’ creativity. This study introduced an interactive learning format called Collaborative Reasoning (CR). The goal was to investigate whether CR would improve a student's ability to generate creative ideas. The data comprised 474 seventh graders from eight classes in a rural middle school in northern China. The eight classes were randomly assigned to two conditions: Four classes participated in CR discussions, and the remaining four classes were taught via teacher-directed Chinese reading classes. After participating in the CR discussions, students completed a Realistic Presented Problem test that was designed to evaluate their creative performance. The results indicated that compared to the control students, CR students generated more effective solutions (fluency) and proposed a greater variety of solutions (flexibility) to three realistic problems. The solutions proposed by the CR students were more unique (novelty) and more useful in real-life situations (usefulness) than those proposed by the control group. Providing abundant opportunities for the exchange of ideas in a social context can boost students’ performance in creative problem-solving.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过合作推理促进中国学生的创造性表现
创造力受到现代社会的高度重视;然而,在中国,创建以学校为基础的课程或促进学生创造力的课程是一个重大挑战。本研究引入了一种称为协作推理(CR)的交互式学习形式。目的是调查CR是否会提高学生产生创造性想法的能力。该数据包括中国北方一所农村中学八个班的474名七年级学生。八个班被随机分配到两个条件下:四个班参加CR讨论,其余四个班通过教师指导的语文阅读课进行教学。在参与CR讨论后,学生们完成了一项现实问题测试,旨在评估他们的创造性表现。结果表明,与对照组学生相比,CR学生对三个现实问题产生了更有效的解决方案(流利性),并提出了更多样的解决方案。CR学生提出的解决方案比对照组提出的更独特(新颖),在现实生活中更有用(有用)。在社会环境中提供丰富的思想交流机会可以提高学生创造性解决问题的能力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
ECNU Review of Education
ECNU Review of Education Social Sciences-Education
CiteScore
4.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊最新文献
Educational Improvement Science: The Art of the Improving Organization Artificial Intelligence and Robotics for Young Children: Redeveloping the Five Big Ideas Framework Extending the Comparisons of Shadow Education and Its Nexus With Schooling Toward a High-Quality System: A Critique of Chinese Special Education Policy Development and the Guidelines for the Evaluation of the Quality of Special Education Schools China's Policy Actions to Lead Teacher Development With Evaluation Reform
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1