Depression, Race-Based Bias, and Judgments of Veracity

IF 1.7 4区 心理学 Q2 PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY European Journal of Psychology Open Pub Date : 2023-07-26 DOI:10.1024/2673-8627/a000040
D. Benz, Marc-André Reinhard
{"title":"Depression, Race-Based Bias, and Judgments of Veracity","authors":"D. Benz, Marc-André Reinhard","doi":"10.1024/2673-8627/a000040","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract: Introduction: The depressive realism hypothesis suggests that depressed individuals have a more realistic perception than nondepressed. Most studies depict the effects of depressive realism on self-perceptions. However, some lie detection studies suggest the effects of depressive realism on the perception of others. Our study investigated the hypothesis that individuals with subclinical depression levels (dysphoric) show a heightened accuracy in lie detection and a lower truth bias. Furthermore, we expected these effects to be stronger in positive statements. Moreover, we expected that nondysphoric but not dysphoric individuals would show a heightened truth bias for Black targets. We also expected to find the effects of depressive realism in judgmental confidence and in self-evaluations of performance. Methods: 472 participants classified 16 video statements as truth or lie. We tested all hypotheses using three depression measures: IPIP-300 Depression Subscale, the PHQ-9, and the CES-D. Results: In contrast to our hypothesis, we found no heightened accuracy in the veracity judgments of dysphoric individuals. Truth bias was higher in dysphoric participants than in nondysphoric. There was an interaction of valence with PHQ-9 but not with IPIP or CES-D. Nondysphoric but not dysphoric participants had a higher truth bias for Black targets. Furthermore, dysphoric individuals had lower judgmental confidence and lower but not more accurate self-evaluation values. Conclusion: We discuss the results and future directions.","PeriodicalId":29838,"journal":{"name":"European Journal of Psychology Open","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.7000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"European Journal of Psychology Open","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1024/2673-8627/a000040","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract: Introduction: The depressive realism hypothesis suggests that depressed individuals have a more realistic perception than nondepressed. Most studies depict the effects of depressive realism on self-perceptions. However, some lie detection studies suggest the effects of depressive realism on the perception of others. Our study investigated the hypothesis that individuals with subclinical depression levels (dysphoric) show a heightened accuracy in lie detection and a lower truth bias. Furthermore, we expected these effects to be stronger in positive statements. Moreover, we expected that nondysphoric but not dysphoric individuals would show a heightened truth bias for Black targets. We also expected to find the effects of depressive realism in judgmental confidence and in self-evaluations of performance. Methods: 472 participants classified 16 video statements as truth or lie. We tested all hypotheses using three depression measures: IPIP-300 Depression Subscale, the PHQ-9, and the CES-D. Results: In contrast to our hypothesis, we found no heightened accuracy in the veracity judgments of dysphoric individuals. Truth bias was higher in dysphoric participants than in nondysphoric. There was an interaction of valence with PHQ-9 but not with IPIP or CES-D. Nondysphoric but not dysphoric participants had a higher truth bias for Black targets. Furthermore, dysphoric individuals had lower judgmental confidence and lower but not more accurate self-evaluation values. Conclusion: We discuss the results and future directions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抑郁、种族偏见和对真实性的判断
摘要:引言:抑郁现实主义假说表明,抑郁个体比非抑郁个体有更现实的感知。大多数研究都描述了抑郁现实主义对自我感知的影响。然而,一些测谎研究表明,抑郁现实主义对他人感知的影响。我们的研究调查了一种假设,即具有亚临床抑郁水平(烦躁)的个体在测谎方面表现出更高的准确性和更低的真实性偏差。此外,我们预计,在积极的发言中,这些影响会更加强烈。此外,我们预计,非回避但非烦躁的个体会对黑人目标表现出更高的真相偏见。我们还期望发现抑郁现实主义在判断信心和自我评价表现方面的影响。方法:472名参与者将16段视频陈述分为真实或谎言。我们使用三种抑郁指标测试了所有假设:IPIP-300抑郁亚量表、PHQ-9和CES-D。结果:与我们的假设相反,我们发现焦虑症患者的真实性判断没有提高准确性。焦虑症参与者的真理偏见高于非焦虑症参与者。与PHQ-9存在价态相互作用,但与IPIP或CES-D不存在价态交互作用。非烦躁但非烦躁的参与者对黑人目标有更高的真相偏见。此外,烦躁不安的个体的判断信心较低,自我评价值较低但并不更准确。结论:我们讨论了结果和未来的方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
European Journal of Psychology Open
European Journal of Psychology Open PSYCHOLOGY, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
8.30%
发文量
9
期刊最新文献
Community Involvement and Mental Health in Russian LGBT People Does Health Vulnerability Predict Voting for Right-Wing Populist Parties in Europe? The Relationship Between Interpersonal Sensitivity and Emotion Regulation in Youths Psychometric Evaluation of the Italian Version of the COVID-19 Vaccine Conspiracy Beliefs Scale The Impact of Information and Communication Technologies on Job Demands and Job Control
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1