Profiling Hesitancy to COVID-19 Vaccinations in Six European Countries: Behavioral, Attitudinal and Demographic Determinants.

IF 2 4区 医学 Q3 BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES Behavioral Medicine Pub Date : 2022-05-11 DOI:10.1080/08964289.2022.2071198
M. Kyprianidou, Pinelopi Konstantinou, J. Álvarez-Gálvez, L. Ceccarelli, E. Gruszczyńska, Dorota Mierzejewska-Floreani, Nataly Loumba, I. Montagni, L. Tavoschi, M. Karekla, A. Kassianos
{"title":"Profiling Hesitancy to COVID-19 Vaccinations in Six European Countries: Behavioral, Attitudinal and Demographic Determinants.","authors":"M. Kyprianidou, Pinelopi Konstantinou, J. Álvarez-Gálvez, L. Ceccarelli, E. Gruszczyńska, Dorota Mierzejewska-Floreani, Nataly Loumba, I. Montagni, L. Tavoschi, M. Karekla, A. Kassianos","doi":"10.1080/08964289.2022.2071198","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Vaccination hesitancy is an important barrier for the effective control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is essential in order to reduce mortality rates. Further, given the variability of the factors and the different recommendations used in each country, it is important to conduct cross-country research to profile individuals who are hesitant toward COVID-19 vaccinations. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine cross-country differences and the behavioral, attitudinal and demographic characteristics of vaccine hesitant individuals. Adults living in six European countries (Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain) were eligible to participate. A total of 832 individuals completed the online survey, with 17.9% reporting being hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine accepters were significantly older (M = 38.9, SD = 14.3), more educated (master/postgraduate studies) and lived in a place with a higher number of residents (>500,000 people) compared to those hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. Discriminant analysis confirmed that the hesitant profile includes a person of younger age, living alone in smaller communities, and without children. Additionally, hesitant participants reported COVID-19-specific characteristics such as lower institutional trust, less adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviors and higher pandemic fatigue. When tackling COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy both socio-demographic and behavioral/attitudinal aspects should be taken into account. Stakeholders are advised to implement targeted vaccination programs while at the same time building trust with population illness cognitions addressed in order to reduce hesitancy rates. Further, stakeholders and public health authorities in each country are suggested to target interventions according to different population characteristics as behavioral and attitudinal determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy differed between countries.","PeriodicalId":55395,"journal":{"name":"Behavioral Medicine","volume":"1 1","pages":"1-12"},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-05-11","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Behavioral Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08964289.2022.2071198","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"BEHAVIORAL SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

Vaccination hesitancy is an important barrier for the effective control of the COVID-19 pandemic. Identifying determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy is essential in order to reduce mortality rates. Further, given the variability of the factors and the different recommendations used in each country, it is important to conduct cross-country research to profile individuals who are hesitant toward COVID-19 vaccinations. This cross-sectional study aimed to examine cross-country differences and the behavioral, attitudinal and demographic characteristics of vaccine hesitant individuals. Adults living in six European countries (Cyprus, France, Germany, Italy, Poland, and Spain) were eligible to participate. A total of 832 individuals completed the online survey, with 17.9% reporting being hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. Vaccine accepters were significantly older (M = 38.9, SD = 14.3), more educated (master/postgraduate studies) and lived in a place with a higher number of residents (>500,000 people) compared to those hesitant to COVID-19 vaccination. Discriminant analysis confirmed that the hesitant profile includes a person of younger age, living alone in smaller communities, and without children. Additionally, hesitant participants reported COVID-19-specific characteristics such as lower institutional trust, less adherence to COVID-19 protective behaviors and higher pandemic fatigue. When tackling COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy both socio-demographic and behavioral/attitudinal aspects should be taken into account. Stakeholders are advised to implement targeted vaccination programs while at the same time building trust with population illness cognitions addressed in order to reduce hesitancy rates. Further, stakeholders and public health authorities in each country are suggested to target interventions according to different population characteristics as behavioral and attitudinal determinants of COVID-19 vaccination hesitancy differed between countries.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
六个欧洲国家对新冠肺炎疫苗接种的犹豫:行为、态度和人口决定因素。
疫苗接种犹豫是有效控制COVID-19大流行的重要障碍。确定COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫的决定因素对于降低死亡率至关重要。此外,鉴于这些因素的可变性和每个国家使用的不同建议,重要的是进行跨国研究,以了解对COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫不决的个人。这项横断面研究旨在检查疫苗犹豫个体的跨国家差异以及行为、态度和人口统计学特征。居住在六个欧洲国家(塞浦路斯、法国、德国、意大利、波兰和西班牙)的成年人有资格参与研究。共有832人完成了在线调查,其中17.9%的人报告对COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫不决。与对COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫不决的人相比,疫苗接种者明显年龄较大(M = 38.9, SD = 14.3),受教育程度更高(硕士/研究生学历),居住在居民人数较多的地方(50万人)。判别分析证实,犹豫不决的人包括年龄较小的人,独居在较小的社区,没有孩子。此外,犹豫不决的参与者报告了COVID-19特有的特征,如较低的机构信任度、较低的COVID-19保护行为依从性和较高的大流行疲劳。在解决COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫问题时,应考虑社会人口和行为/态度两个方面。建议利益攸关方实施有针对性的疫苗接种规划,同时建立对人群疾病认知的信任,以减少犹豫率。此外,建议每个国家的利益攸关方和公共卫生当局根据不同的人口特征采取有针对性的干预措施,因为各国之间COVID-19疫苗接种犹豫不决的行为和态度决定因素有所不同。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Behavioral Medicine
Behavioral Medicine 医学-行为科学
CiteScore
5.30
自引率
4.30%
发文量
44
审稿时长
>12 weeks
期刊介绍: Behavioral Medicine is a multidisciplinary peer-reviewed journal, which fosters and promotes the exchange of knowledge and the advancement of theory in the field of behavioral medicine, including but not limited to understandings of disease prevention, health promotion, health disparities, identification of health risk factors, and interventions designed to reduce health risks, ameliorate health disparities, enhancing all aspects of health. The journal seeks to advance knowledge and theory in these domains in all segments of the population and across the lifespan, in local, national, and global contexts, and with an emphasis on the synergies that exist between biological, psychological, psychosocial, and structural factors as they related to these areas of study and across health states. Behavioral Medicine publishes original empirical studies (experimental and observational research studies, quantitative and qualitative studies, evaluation studies) as well as clinical/case studies. The journal also publishes review articles, which provide systematic evaluations of the literature and propose alternative and innovative theoretical paradigms, as well as brief reports and responses to articles previously published in Behavioral Medicine.
期刊最新文献
Clinician Perspectives on Implementing HPV Vaccination Guidelines into Practice. Adverse Childhood Experiences and Body Mass Index Status among Children and Youth with Special Health Care Needs. Prospective Attitudes Towards Respiratory Syncytial Virus (RSV) Vaccine in Pregnant Women in Greece. The Role of Intersectional Stigma in Coronary Artery Disease Among Cisgender Women Aging with HIV. Men's Preferences for Language and Communication in Mental Health Promotion: A Qualitative Study.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1