The Use of Coffee Husk as Napier Grass Substitution and Its Effect on Madura Cattle Performance

IF 0.3 Q4 VETERINARY SCIENCES Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner Pub Date : 2019-12-31 DOI:10.14334/jitv.v24i4.2006
A. Sudarman, G. Listiawan, L. Khodijah
{"title":"The Use of Coffee Husk as Napier Grass Substitution and Its Effect on Madura Cattle Performance","authors":"A. Sudarman, G. Listiawan, L. Khodijah","doi":"10.14334/jitv.v24i4.2006","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This research aimed to evaluate the performance of fattened madura cattle fed on coffee husk as a source of fibre to substitute grasses. Twenty Madura steers aged approximately 1.5 to 2.0 years with initial weight of 165-190 kg were divided randomly into four different experimental diets, namely R0= 90% concentrates +0% coffee husk +10% napier grass, R1= 90 % concentrates +3.33% coffee husk +6.67% napier grass, R2 = 90% concentrate +10% 6.67% coffee husk +3.33% napier grass, R3 = 90% concentrates 90% + 10% coffee husk +0% napier grass. The feed was given at 3% body weight of dry mater. The cows were kept in individual pen for two months. Variables measured were dry mater intake, feed efficiency, average daily gain (ADG), digestibility of feed and income over feed cost. Data obtained were analyzed using analysis of variance based on randomized block design followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Results showed that dry matter intake, ADG, feed efficiency and feed digestibility of cattle on each treatment of the feed were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Average of dry matter intake and daily gain for R0, R1, R2, and R3 were 6.01, 5.84, 5.73 and 5.62 kg/head/day and 0.88, 0.87, 0.84 and 0.93 kg/head/day respectively. While the average of feed efficiency and DM digestibility for R0, R1, R2, and R3 were 14.64, 14.89, 14.65 and 16.54 % and 84.82, 84.37, 83.47 and 83.30 %, respectively. It is concluded that the used of 10% coffee husk as a source of fibre for substitution of napier grass can be used without negative effect on madura’s cattle performances and tend to give higher values of IOFC on fattening program.","PeriodicalId":17806,"journal":{"name":"Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner","volume":"24 1","pages":"166-172"},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2019-12-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.14334/jitv.v24i4.2006","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"VETERINARY SCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This research aimed to evaluate the performance of fattened madura cattle fed on coffee husk as a source of fibre to substitute grasses. Twenty Madura steers aged approximately 1.5 to 2.0 years with initial weight of 165-190 kg were divided randomly into four different experimental diets, namely R0= 90% concentrates +0% coffee husk +10% napier grass, R1= 90 % concentrates +3.33% coffee husk +6.67% napier grass, R2 = 90% concentrate +10% 6.67% coffee husk +3.33% napier grass, R3 = 90% concentrates 90% + 10% coffee husk +0% napier grass. The feed was given at 3% body weight of dry mater. The cows were kept in individual pen for two months. Variables measured were dry mater intake, feed efficiency, average daily gain (ADG), digestibility of feed and income over feed cost. Data obtained were analyzed using analysis of variance based on randomized block design followed by Duncan’s multiple range test. Results showed that dry matter intake, ADG, feed efficiency and feed digestibility of cattle on each treatment of the feed were not significantly different (P > 0.05). Average of dry matter intake and daily gain for R0, R1, R2, and R3 were 6.01, 5.84, 5.73 and 5.62 kg/head/day and 0.88, 0.87, 0.84 and 0.93 kg/head/day respectively. While the average of feed efficiency and DM digestibility for R0, R1, R2, and R3 were 14.64, 14.89, 14.65 and 16.54 % and 84.82, 84.37, 83.47 and 83.30 %, respectively. It is concluded that the used of 10% coffee husk as a source of fibre for substitution of napier grass can be used without negative effect on madura’s cattle performances and tend to give higher values of IOFC on fattening program.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
咖啡渣替代Napier草及其对马杜拉牛生产性能的影响
本研究旨在评估以咖啡皮作为纤维替代草的来源饲养的育肥马都拉牛的性能。将20头年龄约1.5至2.0岁、初始体重为165-190 kg的马杜拉牛随机分为四种不同的实验日粮,即R0=90%浓缩物+0%咖啡壳+10%napier草、R1=90%浓缩品+3.33%咖啡壳+6.67%napier草和R2=90%精料+10%6.67%咖啡壳+3.33%napier草,R3=90%浓缩物90%+10%咖啡皮+0%纳皮尔草。给料量为干物质重量的3%。奶牛被单独圈养了两个月。测量的变量包括干物质摄入量、饲料效率、平均日增重(ADG)、饲料消化率和饲料成本收入。所获得的数据采用基于随机区组设计的方差分析进行分析,然后进行Duncan多范围检验。结果表明,各处理牛的干物质摄入量、ADG、饲料效率和饲料消化率无显著差异(P>0.05),R0、R1、R2和R3的平均干物质摄入量和日增重分别为6.01、5.84、5.73和5.62kg/头/天和0.88、0.87、0.84和0.93kg/头/日。R0、R1、R2和R3的平均饲料效率和DM消化率分别为14.64、14.89、14.65和16.54%以及84.82、84.37、83.47和83.30%。得出的结论是,使用10%的咖啡皮作为纤维来源来代替napier草可以对madura的牛的性能没有负面影响,并且在育肥计划中往往给出更高的IOFC值。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner
Jurnal Ilmu Ternak dan Veteriner VETERINARY SCIENCES-
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
20.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Changes in Physiological Condition of Broiler Chickens Sprayed with Water before Transportation Effectivity of Dry and Liquid BS4 Enzymes in Improving Performance of Broiler Chickens Fed Different Nutrient Density Diet Correlation between Semen Quality, Libido, and Testosterone Concentration in Bali Bulls Effect of Supplementing Ground Leaf of Misai (Orthosiphon stamineus) in Diet on Growth Performance of Broiler Chickens Application of Infrared Thermography as a Determinant of Sub-Clinical Mastitis in Sapera Dairy Goats
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1