Resultados cl�nicos en pacientes sometidos a angioplastia coronaria percut�nea tratados con colchicina

IF 1.2 Q3 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS REC Interventional Cardiology Pub Date : 2022-12-30 DOI:10.24875/recic.m22000353
César E. Soria Jiménez, Jorge Sanz Sánchez, Molly Brooke Levine, F. Hayat, Jerway Chang y, Héctor García-García
{"title":"Resultados cl�nicos en pacientes sometidos a angioplastia coronaria percut�nea tratados con colchicina","authors":"César E. Soria Jiménez, Jorge Sanz Sánchez, Molly Brooke Levine, F. Hayat, Jerway Chang y, Héctor García-García","doi":"10.24875/recic.m22000353","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Introduction and objectives: The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease, and that resulting from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly recognized, yet the effect of colchicine in attenuating peri-PCI inflammation remains unknown. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of colchicine in patients undergoing PCI for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. Methods: The Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials. gov databases were searched. Data on studies assessing the efficacy profile of colchicine in patients undergoing PCI were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: In 13 studies of 7414 patients, no differences were observed between patients treated with colchicine compared to those without for all-cause mortality (OR, 1.1; 95%CI, 0.72-1.56; I 2 = 0%), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.42-2.28; I 2 = 14.2%), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.65-1.08; I 2 = 1.4%) or coronary revascularization (OR, 0.64; 95%CI, 0.28-1.42; I 2 = 49.3%). However, patients treated with colchicine had a lower risk of stroke (OR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.15-0.72; I 2 = 0%).","PeriodicalId":34295,"journal":{"name":"REC Interventional Cardiology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"REC Interventional Cardiology","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.24875/recic.m22000353","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Introduction and objectives: The role of inflammation in the pathogenesis of coronary artery disease, and that resulting from percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI) is increasingly recognized, yet the effect of colchicine in attenuating peri-PCI inflammation remains unknown. This meta-analysis investigated the efficacy of colchicine in patients undergoing PCI for secondary prevention of coronary artery disease. Methods: The Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials. gov databases were searched. Data on studies assessing the efficacy profile of colchicine in patients undergoing PCI were pooled using a random-effects model. Results: In 13 studies of 7414 patients, no differences were observed between patients treated with colchicine compared to those without for all-cause mortality (OR, 1.1; 95%CI, 0.72-1.56; I 2 = 0%), cardiovascular mortality (OR, 0.98; 95%CI, 0.42-2.28; I 2 = 14.2%), myocardial infarction (OR, 0.84; 95%CI, 0.65-1.08; I 2 = 1.4%) or coronary revascularization (OR, 0.64; 95%CI, 0.28-1.42; I 2 = 49.3%). However, patients treated with colchicine had a lower risk of stroke (OR, 0.33; 95%CI, 0.15-0.72; I 2 = 0%).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
秋水仙素治疗经皮冠状动脉成形术患者的临床结果
前言和目的:炎症在冠状动脉疾病发病机制中的作用,以及经皮冠状动脉介入治疗(PCI)引起的炎症,越来越多的人认识到,但秋水仙碱在减轻PCI围期炎症中的作用尚不清楚。这项荟萃分析调查了秋水仙碱在接受PCI的患者中二级预防冠状动脉疾病的疗效。方法:Web of Science, PubMed, Ovid MEDLINE, Embase, Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials and ClinicalTrials。检索了政府数据库。评估秋水仙碱对PCI患者疗效的研究数据采用随机效应模型进行汇总。结果:在13项涉及7414例患者的研究中,使用秋水仙碱治疗的患者与未使用秋水仙碱治疗的患者的全因死亡率没有差异(OR, 1.1;95%置信区间,0.72 - -1.56;I 2 = 0%),心血管死亡率(OR, 0.98;95%置信区间,0.42 - -2.28;I 2 = 14.2%),心肌梗死(OR, 0.84;95%置信区间,0.65 - -1.08;I 2 = 1.4%)或冠状动脉血运重建术(or, 0.64;95%置信区间,0.28 - -1.42;i2 = 49.3%)。然而,接受秋水仙碱治疗的患者卒中风险较低(OR, 0.33;95%置信区间,0.15 - -0.72;i2 = 0%)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
REC Interventional Cardiology
REC Interventional Cardiology Medicine-Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine
CiteScore
3.10
自引率
28.60%
发文量
87
审稿时长
15 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experiencia inicial con la nueva v�lvula pulmonar percut�nea autoexpandible Venus P Dise�o del estudio ROLLERCOASTR: aterectom�a rotacional, litotricia o l�ser para el tratamiento de estenosis coronarias calcificadas El a�o del primer �impacto� para REC: Interventional Cardiology Cuarenta a�os de Cardialysis: una organizaci�n europea l�der en investigaci�n cardiovascular A debate. Estenosis a�rtica grave asintom�tica, �es el momento de actuar? Perspectiva del cl�nico
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1