Exploring and Interpreting the History of Slavery at James Madison’s Montpelier: A Case Study in Using Archaeology as an Interpretive Tool in Public History Practice

IF 0.2 3区 历史学 Q2 HISTORY PUBLIC HISTORIAN Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1525/tph.2022.44.4.63
Terry P. Brock, Katherine Crawford-Lackey, Matthew Reeves, M. Minkoff
{"title":"Exploring and Interpreting the History of Slavery at James Madison’s Montpelier: A Case Study in Using Archaeology as an Interpretive Tool in Public History Practice","authors":"Terry P. Brock, Katherine Crawford-Lackey, Matthew Reeves, M. Minkoff","doi":"10.1525/tph.2022.44.4.63","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Archaeology’s importance to understanding and exploring difficult histories should be considered an essential tool in the public history toolbox. This paper will explore how the Department of Archaeology at The Montpelier Foundation in Orange, Virginia, interprets the lives of over 350 individuals enslaved by James Madison, the nation’s fourth president. To do so, we use the Rubric of best practices, standards established by the National Summit on Teaching Slavery held in 2018 and published by the National Trust for Historic Preservation in a document called Engaging Descendant Communities in the Interpretation of Slavery at Museums and Historic Sites. This paper examines how the Montpelier Archaeology Department has developed a research and interpretive program that puts the Rubric into practice, making the case that public historians and heritage organizations must robustly engage archaeologists and the discipline of archaeology in all aspects of its research and interpretation.","PeriodicalId":45070,"journal":{"name":"PUBLIC HISTORIAN","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"PUBLIC HISTORIAN","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1525/tph.2022.44.4.63","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"HISTORY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Archaeology’s importance to understanding and exploring difficult histories should be considered an essential tool in the public history toolbox. This paper will explore how the Department of Archaeology at The Montpelier Foundation in Orange, Virginia, interprets the lives of over 350 individuals enslaved by James Madison, the nation’s fourth president. To do so, we use the Rubric of best practices, standards established by the National Summit on Teaching Slavery held in 2018 and published by the National Trust for Historic Preservation in a document called Engaging Descendant Communities in the Interpretation of Slavery at Museums and Historic Sites. This paper examines how the Montpelier Archaeology Department has developed a research and interpretive program that puts the Rubric into practice, making the case that public historians and heritage organizations must robustly engage archaeologists and the discipline of archaeology in all aspects of its research and interpretation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
詹姆斯·麦迪逊蒙彼利埃奴隶制史的探索与解读——以考古学为公共历史实践解释工具的个案研究
摘要:考古学对于理解和探索历史难题的重要性,应被视为公共历史工具箱中的重要工具。本文将探讨弗吉尼亚州奥兰治市蒙伯利埃基金会考古部门如何解读被美国第四任总统詹姆斯·麦迪逊(James Madison)奴役的350多人的生活。为此,我们采用了最佳做法准则,即2018年举行的全国奴隶制教育峰会制定的标准,并由国家历史保护信托基金在一份名为《让后代社区参与博物馆和历史遗址的奴隶制解释》的文件中公布。本文考察了蒙彼利埃考古部门是如何制定一项研究和解释计划,将《准则》付诸实践的,并提出公共历史学家和遗产组织必须在其研究和解释的各个方面积极参与考古学家和考古学学科。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
PUBLIC HISTORIAN
PUBLIC HISTORIAN HISTORY-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
14.30%
发文量
52
期刊介绍: For over twenty-five years, The Public Historian has made its mark as the definitive voice of the public history profession, providing historians with the latest scholarship and applications from the field. The Public Historian publishes the results of scholarly research and case studies, and addresses the broad substantive and theoretical issues in the field. Areas covered include public policy and policy analysis; federal, state, and local history; historic preservation; oral history; museum and historical administration; documentation and information services, corporate biography; public history education; among others.
期刊最新文献
Busy Being Born Slow Disasters and Adaptive Archiving Editor’s Corner History, Historical Culture, and 1821 Review: Blunt Instruments: Recognizing Racist Cultural Infrastructure in Memorials, Museums, and Patriotic Practices, by Kristin Ann Hass
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1