The tension between podcasters and platforms: independent podcasters’ experiences of the paid subscription model

IF 0.9 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Creative Industries Journal Pub Date : 2021-03-05 DOI:10.1080/17510694.2021.1890417
Freja Sørine Adler Berg
{"title":"The tension between podcasters and platforms: independent podcasters’ experiences of the paid subscription model","authors":"Freja Sørine Adler Berg","doi":"10.1080/17510694.2021.1890417","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract In 2019, Podimo, a major paid subscription podcast platform, was launched in Denmark. This sparked a recurring debate among independent podcasters in small language areas with a correspondingly small podcast market: How can podcasters working independently of public service institutions and commercial companies find viable funding models? Taking its departure from the research field of creative labour in the cultural industries and research on the platformization of podcasts , this article explores the inherent tensions between creativity and commerce that independent podcasters experience specifically in relation to paid subscription platforms. This is done by conducting and analysing qualitative interviews with four Danish independent podcasters (The Bad Judges, The Tear Channel, Childless Birds, and Third Ear) who have decided to become exclusive content on Podimo, thereby intensifying the shift from being free labour to paid labour. Interviews are combined with transcriptions of podcast episodes in which podcasters seek to justify why they joined Podimo. The analysis reveals commerce, autonomy and discovery as the podcasters’ key motivations, while their overriding concern is the drop of listeners’ numbers.","PeriodicalId":38664,"journal":{"name":"Creative Industries Journal","volume":"15 1","pages":"58 - 78"},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-03-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/17510694.2021.1890417","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Creative Industries Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/17510694.2021.1890417","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Abstract In 2019, Podimo, a major paid subscription podcast platform, was launched in Denmark. This sparked a recurring debate among independent podcasters in small language areas with a correspondingly small podcast market: How can podcasters working independently of public service institutions and commercial companies find viable funding models? Taking its departure from the research field of creative labour in the cultural industries and research on the platformization of podcasts , this article explores the inherent tensions between creativity and commerce that independent podcasters experience specifically in relation to paid subscription platforms. This is done by conducting and analysing qualitative interviews with four Danish independent podcasters (The Bad Judges, The Tear Channel, Childless Birds, and Third Ear) who have decided to become exclusive content on Podimo, thereby intensifying the shift from being free labour to paid labour. Interviews are combined with transcriptions of podcast episodes in which podcasters seek to justify why they joined Podimo. The analysis reveals commerce, autonomy and discovery as the podcasters’ key motivations, while their overriding concern is the drop of listeners’ numbers.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
播客和平台之间的紧张关系:独立播客对付费订阅模式的体验
2019年,大型付费订阅播客平台Podimo在丹麦上线。这在小语种地区的独立播客中引发了一场反复的争论:独立于公共服务机构和商业公司的播客如何找到可行的融资模式?本文从文化产业创造性劳动的研究领域和播客平台化的研究出发,探讨了独立播客在付费订阅平台上所经历的创造力与商业之间的内在紧张关系。这是通过对四个丹麦独立播客(The Bad Judges, The Tear Channel, children - dless Birds, and Third Ear)进行定性采访和分析完成的,他们决定成为Podimo的独家内容,从而加强了从免费劳动力到付费劳动力的转变。采访与播客片段的转录相结合,在这些片段中,播客试图证明他们为什么加入Podimo。分析显示,商业、自主和发现是播客的主要动机,而他们最关心的是听众数量的下降。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Creative Industries Journal
Creative Industries Journal Arts and Humanities-Visual Arts and Performing Arts
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
27.30%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: The scope of the Creative Industries Journal is global, primarily aimed at those studying and practicing activities which have their origin in individual creativity, skill and talent, and which have a potential for wealth creation. These activities primarily take place in advertising, architecture, the art and antiques market, crafts, design, fashion, film, interactive leisure software, music, the performing arts, publishing, television and radio.
期刊最新文献
Cultural, creative and collective recovery: exploring a creative Worker income Guarantee (CWIG) The arduous art of empowering visual artists: why the Dutch digital sales platform Patty Morgan ultimately failed Nigeria’s creative industries: issues, challenges, and way forward for the software subsector Artificial Creative Intelligence (ACI) A Writing Chance: adjusting the lens on social class and diversity in the UK publishing industry
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1