Small players in a limitless domain: Cyber deterrence as small state strategy

Q3 Social Sciences Comparative Strategy Pub Date : 2022-01-02 DOI:10.1080/01495933.2021.2017740
Marius Kristiansen, Njål Hoem
{"title":"Small players in a limitless domain: Cyber deterrence as small state strategy","authors":"Marius Kristiansen, Njål Hoem","doi":"10.1080/01495933.2021.2017740","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract This article explores deterrence as an element in cybersecurity strategy from a small state perspective. The cyber domain presents novel challenges for strategy makers, and applying deterrence in the cyber domain requires an organized and multinational approach – since few states can leverage deterrence in this all-encompassing domain on their own. Deterrence has been an important factor in shaping global security for half a century, but when applied to the cyber domain there are certain inherent mechanisms that must be understood in order to generate the desired effects. Key issues discussed are the volume of agents capable of operating and creating effects in the domain, and the availability of tools and techniques. These issues concerning actors and vectors makes it difficult to survey threats and create targeted deterrence. Furthermore, the cyber milieu makes it difficult to connect action to motives, thereby further complicating any attempt to analyze the actual importance of observable effects. From a strategist’s point of view, these general characteristics are exacerbated by the fact that the international community does not have a common language or shared platform to uniformly approach these issues. Absent clarity on some fundamentals the core issues of attribution and proportionality becomes a hindrance to effective deterrence.","PeriodicalId":35161,"journal":{"name":"Comparative Strategy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Comparative Strategy","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/01495933.2021.2017740","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract This article explores deterrence as an element in cybersecurity strategy from a small state perspective. The cyber domain presents novel challenges for strategy makers, and applying deterrence in the cyber domain requires an organized and multinational approach – since few states can leverage deterrence in this all-encompassing domain on their own. Deterrence has been an important factor in shaping global security for half a century, but when applied to the cyber domain there are certain inherent mechanisms that must be understood in order to generate the desired effects. Key issues discussed are the volume of agents capable of operating and creating effects in the domain, and the availability of tools and techniques. These issues concerning actors and vectors makes it difficult to survey threats and create targeted deterrence. Furthermore, the cyber milieu makes it difficult to connect action to motives, thereby further complicating any attempt to analyze the actual importance of observable effects. From a strategist’s point of view, these general characteristics are exacerbated by the fact that the international community does not have a common language or shared platform to uniformly approach these issues. Absent clarity on some fundamentals the core issues of attribution and proportionality becomes a hindrance to effective deterrence.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
无限领域中的小玩家:作为小国战略的网络威慑
摘要本文从小国视角探讨威慑作为网络安全战略要素的作用。网络领域给战略制定者带来了新的挑战,在网络领域应用威慑需要有组织和多国的方法,因为很少有国家能够独自在这个无所不包的领域利用威慑。半个世纪以来,威慑一直是塑造全球安全的重要因素,但当应用于网络领域时,必须理解某些内在机制,才能产生预期的效果。讨论的关键问题是能够在领域中操作和创建效果的代理的数量,以及工具和技术的可用性。这些涉及行动者和媒介的问题使调查威胁和建立有针对性的威慑变得困难。此外,网络环境使得很难将行动与动机联系起来,从而进一步使分析可观察到的影响的实际重要性的任何尝试复杂化。从战略家的角度来看,国际社会没有统一处理这些问题的共同语言或共同平台,这一事实加剧了这些普遍特征。如果对某些基本原则不明确,归因和比例的核心问题就会成为有效威慑的障碍。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Comparative Strategy
Comparative Strategy Social Sciences-Political Science and International Relations
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
41
期刊最新文献
How many nuclear weapons does Russia have? The size and characteristics of the Russian nuclear stockpile Controlling the capital: Political dominance in the urbanizing worldControlling the capital: Political dominance in the urbanizing world, by Tom Goodfellow and David Jackman, Oxford University Press, (2023), 288 pp, 110$, ISBN: 9780192868329 Morality, strategy, and emotions: What can contemporary psychological research tell us about their relationship? Japan’s potential assistance in South Korea’s nuclear deterrence and defense Lawfare and International Humanitarian Law: A shift in the war experience for Western democracies
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1