Kept apart: Routine family separation in the UK family immigration system as times of crises

IF 2.2 2区 社会学 Q1 DEMOGRAPHY Migration Studies Pub Date : 2023-05-03 DOI:10.1093/migration/mnad008
Katharine A H Charsley, H. Wray
{"title":"Kept apart: Routine family separation in the UK family immigration system as times of crises","authors":"Katharine A H Charsley, H. Wray","doi":"10.1093/migration/mnad008","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\n The UK’s family immigration regime involves the routine separation of partners from their families. Most obviously, it keeps apart those who are unable to meet the income and other requirements for family (re)unification, and those refused visas. But separation for at least several months, and sometimes much longer, is the norm even for those whose applications are eventually successful. This article draws on creative, co-produced accounts of immigration-related separation to reveal multi-faceted temporalities of crisis in the ‘experiential migrantisation’ of British citizens seeking to reunite bi-national families in the UK. The bureaucratic temporalities of immigration control impede aspirations for life-course progression and shared futures, while increasing the tempo of working and caring lives. In exploring the accounts of British citizens kept apart from partners by the immigration regime through a temporal lens, we chart this experiential migrantisation through the varied and intersecting temporalities of bureaucracy and immigration control, and of biography and (transnational) family life. These can become intertwined with and compound other temporalities of crisis at different levels, from the global Covid-19 pandemic and other international geo-political events, to the more intimate and familial, leading to ‘times of crises’. Such crises are, moreover, often expressed through temporal tropes of key dates missed—birthdays, anniversaries, holidays—and phases of family life postponed.","PeriodicalId":46309,"journal":{"name":"Migration Studies","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Migration Studies","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1093/migration/mnad008","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"DEMOGRAPHY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

The UK’s family immigration regime involves the routine separation of partners from their families. Most obviously, it keeps apart those who are unable to meet the income and other requirements for family (re)unification, and those refused visas. But separation for at least several months, and sometimes much longer, is the norm even for those whose applications are eventually successful. This article draws on creative, co-produced accounts of immigration-related separation to reveal multi-faceted temporalities of crisis in the ‘experiential migrantisation’ of British citizens seeking to reunite bi-national families in the UK. The bureaucratic temporalities of immigration control impede aspirations for life-course progression and shared futures, while increasing the tempo of working and caring lives. In exploring the accounts of British citizens kept apart from partners by the immigration regime through a temporal lens, we chart this experiential migrantisation through the varied and intersecting temporalities of bureaucracy and immigration control, and of biography and (transnational) family life. These can become intertwined with and compound other temporalities of crisis at different levels, from the global Covid-19 pandemic and other international geo-political events, to the more intimate and familial, leading to ‘times of crises’. Such crises are, moreover, often expressed through temporal tropes of key dates missed—birthdays, anniversaries, holidays—and phases of family life postponed.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
分离:危机时期英国家庭移民制度中的常规家庭分离
英国的家庭移民制度涉及到伴侣与家人的常规分离。最明显的是,它将那些无法满足家庭(再)团聚的收入和其他要求的人,以及那些被拒绝签证的人分开。但是,即使是那些最终申请成功的人,至少要分开几个月,有时甚至更长。本文借鉴了与移民相关的分离的创造性,共同制作的帐户,揭示了英国公民寻求在英国团聚的双民族家庭的“体验移民”危机的多方面的临时性。移民管制的官僚主义临时性阻碍了人们对人生历程发展和共同未来的渴望,同时加快了工作和照顾他人生活的节奏。在通过时间镜头探索移民制度将英国公民与伴侣分开的叙述时,我们通过官僚主义和移民控制以及传记和(跨国)家庭生活的各种交叉的时间性来描绘这种经验移民。从2019冠状病毒病全球大流行和其他国际地缘政治事件,到更为亲密和家庭的事件,这些危机可能在不同层面与其他临时性危机交织在一起,并使之复杂化,从而导致“危机时期”。此外,这种危机通常通过错过关键日期(生日、周年纪念日、假期)和家庭生活推迟等时间隐喻来表达。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Migration Studies
Migration Studies DEMOGRAPHY-
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
5.30%
发文量
41
期刊介绍: Migration shapes human society and inspires ground-breaking research efforts across many different academic disciplines and policy areas. Migration Studies contributes to the consolidation of this field of scholarship, developing the core concepts that link different disciplinary perspectives on migration. To this end, the journal welcomes full-length articles, research notes, and reviews of books, films and other media from those working across the social sciences in all parts of the world. Priority is given to methodological, comparative and theoretical advances. The journal also publishes occasional special issues.
期刊最新文献
Immigrants’ subjective well-being in Europe: Variation by regional attitudes towards immigrants Reflexive reciprocity under an ethics of care: Reflections from the field for refugee studies Determinants of return migration of Estonian young adults in transnational mobility Exploring urban co-presence and migrant integration on Beirut’s seafront Winners and losers from occupational segregation across Europe: the role of gender and migration status
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1