Chinese auditor inspection access challenges: The market’s response to integrated US regulatory and legislative action

IF 3.3 3区 管理学 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting and Public Policy Pub Date : 2023-11-01 DOI:10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107110
Lacey Donley , Joseph Legoria , Kenneth J. Reichelt , Stephanie Walton
{"title":"Chinese auditor inspection access challenges: The market’s response to integrated US regulatory and legislative action","authors":"Lacey Donley ,&nbsp;Joseph Legoria ,&nbsp;Kenneth J. Reichelt ,&nbsp;Stephanie Walton","doi":"10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2023.107110","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>We examine the impact of mounting regulator interest in US-listed Chinese firms facing PCAOB inspection access challenges. Our study provides evidence of the market’s response to five events taking place from 2018 to 2020. Collectively, these events mark the first-ever integrated regulatory and legislative response from the PCAOB, SEC, and US legislature since initiation of the PCAOB’s international inspection program. First, we consider whether the PCAOB’s eighth annual update of inaccessible jurisdictions is newsworthy to investors. Next, we consider investors’ perceptions of audit quality risks and delisting risks among Chinese firms. We find that the market does respond negatively towards cross-listed Chinese firms following PCAOB, SEC, and US legislative action. Results further suggest that market reactions are motivated by investors’ perception of a delisting risk among Chinese firms. This observation is most salient among small Chinese firms having fewer listing alternatives outside of the US.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48070,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.3000,"publicationDate":"2023-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting and Public Policy","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0278425423000595","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

We examine the impact of mounting regulator interest in US-listed Chinese firms facing PCAOB inspection access challenges. Our study provides evidence of the market’s response to five events taking place from 2018 to 2020. Collectively, these events mark the first-ever integrated regulatory and legislative response from the PCAOB, SEC, and US legislature since initiation of the PCAOB’s international inspection program. First, we consider whether the PCAOB’s eighth annual update of inaccessible jurisdictions is newsworthy to investors. Next, we consider investors’ perceptions of audit quality risks and delisting risks among Chinese firms. We find that the market does respond negatively towards cross-listed Chinese firms following PCAOB, SEC, and US legislative action. Results further suggest that market reactions are motivated by investors’ perception of a delisting risk among Chinese firms. This observation is most salient among small Chinese firms having fewer listing alternatives outside of the US.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中国审计师检查准入的挑战:市场对美国监管和立法行动的反应
我们研究了监管机构对面临PCAOB审查准入挑战的在美上市中国公司日益增长的兴趣所产生的影响。我们的研究提供了市场对2018年至2020年发生的五个事件的反应的证据。总的来说,这些事件标志着自PCAOB国际检查计划启动以来,PCAOB、SEC和美国立法机构首次对监管和立法作出综合回应。首先,我们考虑PCAOB第八次发布的难以进入司法管辖区的年度更新对投资者来说是否具有新闻价值。其次,我们考虑投资者对中国公司审计质量风险和退市风险的认知。我们发现,在PCAOB、SEC和美国的立法行动之后,市场确实对交叉上市的中国公司做出了负面反应。研究结果进一步表明,投资者对中国企业退市风险的认知推动了市场反应。这一现象在那些在美国以外上市选择较少的中国小企业中最为明显。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.80
自引率
2.80%
发文量
75
期刊介绍: The Journal of Accounting and Public Policy publishes research papers focusing on the intersection between accounting and public policy. Preference is given to papers illuminating through theoretical or empirical analysis, the effects of accounting on public policy and vice-versa. Subjects treated in this journal include the interface of accounting with economics, political science, sociology, or law. The Journal includes a section entitled Accounting Letters. This section publishes short research articles that should not exceed approximately 3,000 words. The objective of this section is to facilitate the rapid dissemination of important accounting research. Accordingly, articles submitted to this section will be reviewed within fours weeks of receipt, revisions will be limited to one, and publication will occur within four months of acceptance.
期刊最新文献
Clawback provisions and insider trading profits The impact of investment banks going public on underwriting behavior: Evidence from IPO clients’ earnings management Accounting comparability and customer concentration The impact of stock market liberalization on management forecast precision–Evidence from Mainland-Hong Kong Stock Connect Programs in China Editorial Board
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1