Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients over 80 years old age with acute coronary syndrome

A. Alexandrov, H. Mateev, G. Vladimirov, I. Bayraktarova, I. Petrova, E. Kostova-Dimitrova
{"title":"Percutaneous coronary interventions in patients over 80 years old age with acute coronary syndrome","authors":"A. Alexandrov, H. Mateev, G. Vladimirov, I. Bayraktarova, I. Petrova, E. Kostova-Dimitrova","doi":"10.3897/bgcardio.29.e102027","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Age is an important non-modifi able risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Both European and American guidelines recommend offering an invasive reperfusion strategy in elderly patients with ACS, taking into account the patients‘ comorbidities and baseline level of functioning. Materials and methods: All patients over 80 years of age with acute coronary syndrome, treated in the Department of Invasive Cardiology of the National Heart Hospital for the period between January 1, 2016. and December 31, 2018, are retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was defi ned as all-cause mortality during the hospital stay and at follow-up. Predictors of mortality were assessed and independent predictors were identifi ed. Results: During the study period, 179 patients aged 80 years or older were identifi ed as being treated for ACS with PCI. In the study population, in hospital mortality for the index event was 11.8%. At a mean follow-up time of 20.19 ± 11.9 months, mortality rose signifi cantly to 64.6%. When evaluating in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis, the two independent predictors were Cardiogenic shock (HR 0.005, 95% CI 0.01–0.44; p < 0.001) and acute/exacerbated renal failure (0.986 95% CI 0.984-0.997; p = 0.015). Conclusion: The present study provides important information regarding characteristics and outcomes in very elderly patients undergoing PCI for ACS. In the future, this subset of patients is predicted to grow, meaning that their approach must be evidence-based to ensure safe and effective treatment options.","PeriodicalId":33976,"journal":{"name":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"B''lgarska kardiologiia","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3897/bgcardio.29.e102027","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Age is an important non-modifi able risk factor for cardiovascular disease. Both European and American guidelines recommend offering an invasive reperfusion strategy in elderly patients with ACS, taking into account the patients‘ comorbidities and baseline level of functioning. Materials and methods: All patients over 80 years of age with acute coronary syndrome, treated in the Department of Invasive Cardiology of the National Heart Hospital for the period between January 1, 2016. and December 31, 2018, are retrospectively analyzed. The primary endpoint was defi ned as all-cause mortality during the hospital stay and at follow-up. Predictors of mortality were assessed and independent predictors were identifi ed. Results: During the study period, 179 patients aged 80 years or older were identifi ed as being treated for ACS with PCI. In the study population, in hospital mortality for the index event was 11.8%. At a mean follow-up time of 20.19 ± 11.9 months, mortality rose signifi cantly to 64.6%. When evaluating in-hospital mortality on multivariate analysis, the two independent predictors were Cardiogenic shock (HR 0.005, 95% CI 0.01–0.44; p < 0.001) and acute/exacerbated renal failure (0.986 95% CI 0.984-0.997; p = 0.015). Conclusion: The present study provides important information regarding characteristics and outcomes in very elderly patients undergoing PCI for ACS. In the future, this subset of patients is predicted to grow, meaning that their approach must be evidence-based to ensure safe and effective treatment options.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
80岁以上急性冠状动脉综合征患者的经皮冠状动脉介入治疗
年龄是心血管疾病的一个重要的不可改变的危险因素。欧洲和美国的指南都建议为老年ACS患者提供有创再灌注策略,同时考虑患者的合并症和基线功能水平。材料和方法:所有80岁以上的急性冠状动脉综合征患者,于2016年1月1日在国家心脏医院有创心内科接受治疗。和2018年12月31日。主要终点定义为住院期间和随访期间的全因死亡率。评估了死亡率的预测因素,并确定了独立的预测因素。结果:在研究期间,179名80岁或以上的患者被确定为正在接受PCI治疗的ACS患者。在研究人群中,该指标事件的住院死亡率为11.8%。在平均随访20.19±11.9个月时,死亡率显著上升至64.6%。在多变量分析中评估住院死亡率时,两个独立的预测因素是心源性休克(HR 0.005,95%CI 0.01-0.44;p<0.001)和急性/加重肾功能衰竭(0.986,95%CI 0.984-0.997;p=0.015)。未来,预计这部分患者会增加,这意味着他们的方法必须基于证据,以确保安全有效的治疗选择。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.10
自引率
0.00%
发文量
40
审稿时长
12 weeks
期刊最新文献
Contemporary approach to st elevation myocardial infarction in very young Long term effect of renal denervation on 24 hour abpm blood pressure variability and blood pressure load parameters Blood pressure and hypertension in type 1 diabetes mellitus patients with long duration Cardiac myxoma – two clinical cases with a different presentation Opportunistic screening for hypertension in the general population in Bulgaria: international society of hypertension may measurement month campaign
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1