In favor or against: The influence of skeptical stakeholders in urban innovation projects for green transformation

IF 7.4 1区 管理学 Q1 MANAGEMENT International Journal of Project Management Pub Date : 2023-10-01 DOI:10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102515
Julia Kroh , Carsten Schultz
{"title":"In favor or against: The influence of skeptical stakeholders in urban innovation projects for green transformation","authors":"Julia Kroh ,&nbsp;Carsten Schultz","doi":"10.1016/j.ijproman.2023.102515","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Skeptical stakeholder involvement – collaborating with stakeholders who may harbor negative attitudes - is a complex, uncertain process that poses substantial challenges for innovation project management. Developing complex innovations like those in urban spaces requires engagement with knowledge, behavioral shifts, and resources from both public and private stakeholders. As a result, these stakeholders might oppose the project's objectives, thereby exerting a significant influence on the project. However, scant attention has been directed toward investigating the role of skeptical stakeholder involvement. The goal of this research is to address this research gap by examining the underexplored impact of skeptical stakeholder involvement on the project front end, thereby underscoring the importance of innovativeness and implementation intention as outcomes during these initial project stages. The study draws on a unique combination of text mining, text analysis, and survey data derived from 107 publicly funded urban innovation projects in Germany. These projects encompass diverse innovation types and technologies that may affect nearly all stakeholders within a given city district, thus making the context an ideal empirical terrain for investigation. The study's findings reveal that (<em>i</em>) skeptical stakeholder involvement positively influences innovativeness and implementation intention, and (<em>ii</em>) a robust reservoir of project management resources, coupled with moderate levels of formal management, facilitates the integration of skeptical stakeholders. The study advances current literature on project stakeholder management and project front-end dynamics by highlighting the positive influences of skeptical stakeholder involvement. Consequently, these outcomes contribute to the broader literature on sustainable urban transformation and enhance our understanding of stakeholder management mechanisms in the realm of urban innovation projects.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":48429,"journal":{"name":"International Journal of Project Management","volume":"41 7","pages":"Article 102515"},"PeriodicalIF":7.4000,"publicationDate":"2023-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"International Journal of Project Management","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0263786323000790","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"MANAGEMENT","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Skeptical stakeholder involvement – collaborating with stakeholders who may harbor negative attitudes - is a complex, uncertain process that poses substantial challenges for innovation project management. Developing complex innovations like those in urban spaces requires engagement with knowledge, behavioral shifts, and resources from both public and private stakeholders. As a result, these stakeholders might oppose the project's objectives, thereby exerting a significant influence on the project. However, scant attention has been directed toward investigating the role of skeptical stakeholder involvement. The goal of this research is to address this research gap by examining the underexplored impact of skeptical stakeholder involvement on the project front end, thereby underscoring the importance of innovativeness and implementation intention as outcomes during these initial project stages. The study draws on a unique combination of text mining, text analysis, and survey data derived from 107 publicly funded urban innovation projects in Germany. These projects encompass diverse innovation types and technologies that may affect nearly all stakeholders within a given city district, thus making the context an ideal empirical terrain for investigation. The study's findings reveal that (i) skeptical stakeholder involvement positively influences innovativeness and implementation intention, and (ii) a robust reservoir of project management resources, coupled with moderate levels of formal management, facilitates the integration of skeptical stakeholders. The study advances current literature on project stakeholder management and project front-end dynamics by highlighting the positive influences of skeptical stakeholder involvement. Consequently, these outcomes contribute to the broader literature on sustainable urban transformation and enhance our understanding of stakeholder management mechanisms in the realm of urban innovation projects.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
支持或反对:持怀疑态度的利益相关者对城市创新项目绿色转型的影响
持怀疑态度的利益相关者参与——与可能怀有消极态度的利益相关者合作——是一个复杂的、不确定的过程,对创新项目管理构成了重大挑战。开发像城市空间这样的复杂创新需要知识的参与、行为的转变以及公共和私人利益相关者的资源。因此,这些干系人可能会反对项目的目标,从而对项目产生重大影响。然而,很少有人关注调查持怀疑态度的利益相关者参与的作用。本研究的目的是通过研究持怀疑态度的利益相关者参与对项目前端的未充分探索的影响来解决这一研究差距,从而强调创新性和实施意图在这些初始项目阶段作为结果的重要性。该研究采用了文本挖掘、文本分析和调查数据的独特组合,这些数据来自德国107个公共资助的城市创新项目。这些项目涵盖了不同的创新类型和技术,可能会影响到给定城市区域内几乎所有的利益相关者,从而使环境成为理想的实证研究领域。研究结果表明:(1)持怀疑态度的干系人参与对创新和实施意愿产生积极影响;(2)强大的项目管理资源库,加上适度的正式管理水平,有利于持怀疑态度的干系人的整合。本研究通过强调持怀疑态度的干系人参与的积极影响,进一步推进了目前有关项目干系人管理和项目前端动态的文献。因此,这些结果有助于更广泛地研究可持续城市转型,并增强我们对城市创新项目领域中利益相关者管理机制的理解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
12.30
自引率
26.20%
发文量
83
审稿时长
59 days
期刊介绍: The International Journal of Project Management is recognized as a premier publication in the field of project management and organization studies. Our main objective is to contribute to the advancement of project management and project organizing through the publication of groundbreaking research. We are dedicated to presenting fresh insights and new knowledge in various domains, including project management, program management, portfolio management, project-oriented organizations, project networks, and project-oriented societies. We actively encourage submissions that explore project management and organizing from the perspectives of organizational behavior, strategy, supply chain management, technology, change management, innovation, and sustainability. By publishing high-quality research articles and reviews, we strive to revolutionize the academic landscape and propel the field of project management forward. We invite researchers, scholars, and practitioners to contribute to our journal and be a part of the progressive development in this exciting field.
期刊最新文献
Empowering project team to perform: Directive and facilitative antecedents When project outcomes matter: Organizational integration in managing long-term target benefits Struggling with strategizing in public client organisations: Managing strategic projects in inter-organisational contexts Projects as drivers of sustainability: How the adoption of the reuse principle affects the front-end of a construction project Dynamics of multi-level programme integration in a strategic programme: The case of the COVID-19 vaccination campaign in France
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1