Clinical importance of antinuclear antibody testing in a tertiary neuro-care center, India

IF 1 Q4 BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Pub Date : 2023-04-01 DOI:10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_48_23
P. Kruthika, M. Netravathi, A. Mahadevan, Veenakumari Haradarabahubali, N. Chandrashekar
{"title":"Clinical importance of antinuclear antibody testing in a tertiary neuro-care center, India","authors":"P. Kruthika, M. Netravathi, A. Mahadevan, Veenakumari Haradarabahubali, N. Chandrashekar","doi":"10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_48_23","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing is the first test ordered in any patient suspected of autoimmune diseases. Often ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) screening tests have high sensitivity because of high background, which can lead to erroneous clinical diagnosis and management when ordered unnecessarily. The following study was undertaken to envisage the clinical importance of ANA-positive test results among cases presenting to a tertiary neuro-care center. Methods: Present study is a secondary data analysis of 166 ANA IIF positive samples. Serum samples were further subjected to specific antigen detection by ANA immunoblot assay. The final diagnosis was reviewed in the context of descriptive data as to why testing was ordered. Results: The overall positivity rate of ANA for 3 years was 2.12%. The peripheral nervous system was most commonly involved accounting for 56 (33.73%) cases followed by the central nervous system in 40 (24.09%) cases and others. The predominant ANA pattern observed was speckled in 73 (43.9%) cases. On ANA profiling, reactivity to Ro52 (35 [40.22%]) was most common. Females were predominantly (70.5%) affected than males (29.5%). There was no association found in ANA pattern with age, sex, duration of illness, and the clinical disorder. Conclusions: ANA positivity is sporadically associated with nervous system autoimmune disorders. Screening tests like ANA can be judiciously employed for meaningful clinical interpretation of neurological diseases.","PeriodicalId":36500,"journal":{"name":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","volume":"7 1","pages":"201 - 208"},"PeriodicalIF":1.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/bbrj.bbrj_48_23","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"BIOTECHNOLOGY & APPLIED MICROBIOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: Antinuclear antibody (ANA) testing is the first test ordered in any patient suspected of autoimmune diseases. Often ANA indirect immunofluorescence (IIF) screening tests have high sensitivity because of high background, which can lead to erroneous clinical diagnosis and management when ordered unnecessarily. The following study was undertaken to envisage the clinical importance of ANA-positive test results among cases presenting to a tertiary neuro-care center. Methods: Present study is a secondary data analysis of 166 ANA IIF positive samples. Serum samples were further subjected to specific antigen detection by ANA immunoblot assay. The final diagnosis was reviewed in the context of descriptive data as to why testing was ordered. Results: The overall positivity rate of ANA for 3 years was 2.12%. The peripheral nervous system was most commonly involved accounting for 56 (33.73%) cases followed by the central nervous system in 40 (24.09%) cases and others. The predominant ANA pattern observed was speckled in 73 (43.9%) cases. On ANA profiling, reactivity to Ro52 (35 [40.22%]) was most common. Females were predominantly (70.5%) affected than males (29.5%). There was no association found in ANA pattern with age, sex, duration of illness, and the clinical disorder. Conclusions: ANA positivity is sporadically associated with nervous system autoimmune disorders. Screening tests like ANA can be judiciously employed for meaningful clinical interpretation of neurological diseases.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
抗核抗体检测在印度三级神经保健中心的临床重要性
背景:抗核抗体(ANA)检测是任何怀疑自身免疫性疾病患者的第一项检测。通常,ANA间接免疫荧光(IIF)筛查试验具有高灵敏度,因为高背景,在不必要的情况下可能导致错误的临床诊断和管理。以下研究是为了设想在三级神经保健中心就诊的病例中,ana阳性检测结果的临床重要性。方法:对166例ANA IIF阳性样本进行二次资料分析。血清样品进一步进行ANA免疫印迹法特异性抗原检测。最后的诊断是在描述性数据的背景下审查,为什么测试是有序的。结果:ANA 3年总阳性率为2.12%。以周围神经系统受累最多,56例(33.73%),其次为中枢神经系统40例(24.09%)。73例(43.9%)ANA以斑点型为主。在ANA分析中,Ro52的反应性(35[40.22%])最为常见。女性(70.5%)高于男性(29.5%)。没有发现ANA模式与年龄、性别、病程和临床障碍相关。结论:ANA阳性与神经系统自身免疫性疾病偶有关联。像ANA这样的筛选试验可以明智地用于神经系统疾病的有意义的临床解释。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal
Biomedical and Biotechnology Research Journal Biochemistry, Genetics and Molecular Biology-Biotechnology
CiteScore
2.20
自引率
42.90%
发文量
24
审稿时长
11 weeks
期刊最新文献
Association of sex hormone-binding globulin gene polymorphism and sex hormone-binding globulin levels in postmenopausal women in relation to type 2 diabetes mellitus – A case–Control study Prevalence and Risk Factors for Hypogonadism in Male Patients with Type 2 Diabetes Mellitus Cycle threshold value and coronavirus disease 2019 clinical type among smokers and nonsmokers reveal no significant association despite clinical type shows smokers are at high risk: A retrospective study Cytochrome P450 gene and pediatric epilepsy: An observational study Identification of hub genes in the fructose-1, 6 bisphosphate 1-protein interaction network based on differential expression, and survival impact on hepatocellular carcinoma patients
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1