UNIVERSAL RISK BUDGETING

IF 2 0 ECONOMICS Annals of Financial Economics Pub Date : 2021-06-18 DOI:10.1142/s2010495221500147
Alex Garivaltis
{"title":"UNIVERSAL RISK BUDGETING","authors":"Alex Garivaltis","doi":"10.1142/s2010495221500147","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"I juxtapose Cover’s vaunted universal portfolio selection algorithm ([Cover, TM (1991). Universal portfolios. Mathematical Finance, 1, 1–29]) with the modern representation of a portfolio as a certain allocation of risk among the available assets, rather than a mere allocation of capital. Thus, I define a Universal Risk Budgeting scheme that weights each risk budget, instead of each capital budget, by its historical performance record, á la Cover. I prove that my scheme is mathematically equivalent to a novel type of [Cover, TM and E Ordentlich (1996). Universal portfolios with side information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 42, 348–363] universal portfolio that uses a new family of prior densities that have hitherto not appeared in the literature on universal portfolio theory. I argue that my universal risk budget, so-defined, is a potentially more perspicuous and flexible type of universal portfolio; it allows the algorithmic trader to incorporate, with advantage, his prior knowledge or beliefs about the particular covariance structure of instantaneous asset returns. Say, if there is some dispersion in the volatilities of the available assets, then the uniform or Dirichlet priors that are standard in the literature will generate a dangerously lopsided prior distribution over the possible risk budgets. In the author’s opinion, the proposed “Garivaltis prior” makes for a nice improvement on Cover’s timeless expert system, that is properly agnostic and open to different risk budgets from the very get-go. Inspired by [Jamshidian, F (1992). Asymptotically optimal portfolios. Mathematical Finance, 2, 131–150], the universal risk budget is formulated as a new kind of exotic option in the continuous time Black–Scholes market, with all the pleasure, elegance, and convenience that entails.","PeriodicalId":43570,"journal":{"name":"Annals of Financial Economics","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-06-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Annals of Financial Economics","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1142/s2010495221500147","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

I juxtapose Cover’s vaunted universal portfolio selection algorithm ([Cover, TM (1991). Universal portfolios. Mathematical Finance, 1, 1–29]) with the modern representation of a portfolio as a certain allocation of risk among the available assets, rather than a mere allocation of capital. Thus, I define a Universal Risk Budgeting scheme that weights each risk budget, instead of each capital budget, by its historical performance record, á la Cover. I prove that my scheme is mathematically equivalent to a novel type of [Cover, TM and E Ordentlich (1996). Universal portfolios with side information. IEEE Transactions on Information Theory, 42, 348–363] universal portfolio that uses a new family of prior densities that have hitherto not appeared in the literature on universal portfolio theory. I argue that my universal risk budget, so-defined, is a potentially more perspicuous and flexible type of universal portfolio; it allows the algorithmic trader to incorporate, with advantage, his prior knowledge or beliefs about the particular covariance structure of instantaneous asset returns. Say, if there is some dispersion in the volatilities of the available assets, then the uniform or Dirichlet priors that are standard in the literature will generate a dangerously lopsided prior distribution over the possible risk budgets. In the author’s opinion, the proposed “Garivaltis prior” makes for a nice improvement on Cover’s timeless expert system, that is properly agnostic and open to different risk budgets from the very get-go. Inspired by [Jamshidian, F (1992). Asymptotically optimal portfolios. Mathematical Finance, 2, 131–150], the universal risk budget is formulated as a new kind of exotic option in the continuous time Black–Scholes market, with all the pleasure, elegance, and convenience that entails.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
普遍风险预算
我将Cover引以为豪的通用投资组合选择算法([Cover,TM(1991)。通用投资组合。数学金融,1,1–29])与投资组合的现代表示并列为可用资产中的特定风险分配,而不仅仅是资本分配。因此,我定义了一个通用风险预算方案,该方案根据其历史业绩记录ála Cover来加权每个风险预算,而不是每个资本预算。我证明了我的方案在数学上等同于一种新型的[Coverr,TM和E Ordentlich(1996)。带辅助信息的通用投资组合。IEEE信息论汇刊,42348-363]通用投资组合,该投资组合使用了一个新的先验密度族,该密度族迄今为止尚未出现在通用投资组合理论的文献中。我认为,我的通用风险预算,如此定义,是一种潜在的更清晰和灵活的通用投资组合类型;它允许算法交易者有利地结合他之前对瞬时资产回报的特定协方差结构的知识或信念。例如,如果可用资产的波动性存在一定的分散性,那么文献中标准的统一先验或狄利克雷先验将在可能的风险预算上产生危险的不平衡先验分布。在作者看来,拟议的“Garivaltis先验”对Cover永恒的专家系统进行了很好的改进,该系统从一开始就具有适当的不可知性,并对不同的风险预算开放。受[Jamshidian,F(1992)。渐进最优投资组合。数学金融,2131-150]的启发,通用风险预算被制定为连续时间Black-Scholes市场中的一种新的奇异选项,具有所需的所有乐趣、优雅和便利。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
6.60
自引率
55.00%
发文量
30
期刊最新文献
How Do Remittance Inflows Cause the Dutch Disease in the Financial Sector? The Role of Financial Risk and Human Capital Factors Affecting the Crude Oil Prices Volatility: A Case Study of the USA, China, Japan, Germany and India The Emerging Stock Markets and Their Asymmetric Response to Infectious Disease Equity Market Volatility (ID-EMV) Index Greenhouse Gas Emissions and the Rising Effects of Renewable Energy Consumption and Climate Risk Development Finance: Evidence from BRICS Countries Potential Welfare Gains from Optimal Macro Hedging for Oil Exporters
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1