Search for Optimal MRI Protocol for the Diagnosis of Vaginal Tumor

S. P. Aksenova, N. Nudnov, V. Solodkiy
{"title":"Search for Optimal MRI Protocol for the Diagnosis of Vaginal Tumor","authors":"S. P. Aksenova, N. Nudnov, V. Solodkiy","doi":"10.20862/0042-4676-2022-103-4-6-58-70","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background. A wide variety of pulse sequences, the possibility of multiplanar imaging significantly increase the capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing diseases of the female reproductive system. At the same time, the lack of a regulated scanning protocol, especially in patients who have undergone anticancer treatment, requires standardization of the technique and the search for an optimal set of pulse sequences that allows to visualize the vagina throughout its entire length and to perform differential diagnosis between continued tumor growth and post-radiation changes while maintaining an adequate examination time.Objective: to determine the optimal set of MRI pulse sequences for pelvic organs examination in patients with vaginal tumors and to form an original research protocol based on diagnostic information content.Material and methods. The study included 141 patients with vaginal tumors. A comparative analysis of four MRI protocols was carried out, built according to the principle “from simple to complex” (from native to multiparametric MRI).Results. A significant difference was obtained between all information content indicators of Protocol 4 compared to Protocol 1 (sensitivity p = 0.00006, specificity p = 0.00443, AUC p = 0.00000). Data analysis also showed a significant difference between sensitivity and AUC for Protocols 2 and 4 (p = 0.00150 and p = 0.00087, respectively), and Protocols 3 and 4 (p = 0.01333 and p = 0.01333, respectively).Conclusion. Significant increase in the information content of Protocol 4 compared to other protocols (sensitivity up to 93%, specificity up to 94%, accuracy up to 93%) indicates the expediency of the priority use of multiparametric MRI in the primary diagnosis of vaginal tumor lesions.","PeriodicalId":34090,"journal":{"name":"Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-10-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Vestnik rentgenologii i radiologii","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.20862/0042-4676-2022-103-4-6-58-70","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Background. A wide variety of pulse sequences, the possibility of multiplanar imaging significantly increase the capabilities of magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) in diagnosing diseases of the female reproductive system. At the same time, the lack of a regulated scanning protocol, especially in patients who have undergone anticancer treatment, requires standardization of the technique and the search for an optimal set of pulse sequences that allows to visualize the vagina throughout its entire length and to perform differential diagnosis between continued tumor growth and post-radiation changes while maintaining an adequate examination time.Objective: to determine the optimal set of MRI pulse sequences for pelvic organs examination in patients with vaginal tumors and to form an original research protocol based on diagnostic information content.Material and methods. The study included 141 patients with vaginal tumors. A comparative analysis of four MRI protocols was carried out, built according to the principle “from simple to complex” (from native to multiparametric MRI).Results. A significant difference was obtained between all information content indicators of Protocol 4 compared to Protocol 1 (sensitivity p = 0.00006, specificity p = 0.00443, AUC p = 0.00000). Data analysis also showed a significant difference between sensitivity and AUC for Protocols 2 and 4 (p = 0.00150 and p = 0.00087, respectively), and Protocols 3 and 4 (p = 0.01333 and p = 0.01333, respectively).Conclusion. Significant increase in the information content of Protocol 4 compared to other protocols (sensitivity up to 93%, specificity up to 94%, accuracy up to 93%) indicates the expediency of the priority use of multiparametric MRI in the primary diagnosis of vaginal tumor lesions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
寻找诊断阴道肿瘤的最佳MRI方案
背景多种脉冲序列,多平面成像的可能性大大提高了磁共振成像(MRI)诊断女性生殖系统疾病的能力。同时,缺乏规范的扫描方案,尤其是在接受过抗癌治疗的患者中,需要技术的标准化和寻找一组最佳的脉冲序列,该脉冲序列允许在阴道的整个长度上可视化阴道。目的:确定阴道肿瘤患者盆腔器官检查的最佳MRI脉冲序列集,并根据诊断信息内容形成原始的研究方案。材料和方法。这项研究包括141名阴道肿瘤患者。根据“从简单到复杂”(从原生到多参数MRI)的原则,对四种MRI方案进行了比较分析。后果与方案1相比,方案4的所有信息内容指标之间存在显著差异(敏感性p=0.000006,特异性p=0.000443,AUC p=0.000000)。数据分析还显示,方案2和方案4(分别为p=0.00150和p=0.000087)以及方案3和方案4的敏感性和AUC之间存在显着差异(分别为0.01333和0.01333)。结论与其他方案相比,方案4的信息内容显著增加(敏感性高达93%,特异性高达94%,准确性高达93%),表明在阴道肿瘤病变的初步诊断中优先使用多参数MRI是方便的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
36 weeks
期刊最新文献
Comparative Reproducibility Analysis of Thoracic Aorta Morphometric Parameters According to Computed Tomography and Magnetic Resonance Angiography Radiological Features of Changes in the Lungs Caused by Fast- or Slow-Growing Nontuberculous Mycobacteria To Help the Practitioner: Imaging of Ovarian Masses According to the O-RADS MRI Ovarian Malignancy Categorical Risk Scale Experience in Using Breast Single-Photon Emission Computed Tomography with <sup>99m</sup>Tc-MIBI Differential Diagnosis of Fibrotic Hypersensitivity Pneumonitis with Its Non-Fibrotic Phenotype and Usual Interstitial Pneumonia During High-Resolution Computed Tomography
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1