Understanding online conversations about COVID-19 vaccine on Twitter: vaccine hesitancy amid the public health crisis

IF 1.9 Q2 COMMUNICATION Communication Research Reports Pub Date : 2021-10-20 DOI:10.1080/08824096.2021.1983424
E. Malova
{"title":"Understanding online conversations about COVID-19 vaccine on Twitter: vaccine hesitancy amid the public health crisis","authors":"E. Malova","doi":"10.1080/08824096.2021.1983424","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Timely vaccination against COVID-19 can prevent many people from getting infected. However, given the disease novelty and fast vaccine development, some people are hesitant to vaccinate. Online social networks like Twitter produce huge amounts of public health information and may impact peoples’ vaccination decisions. Hence, it is important to understand the conversation around the COVID-19 vaccination through the lens of social media. The present study aimed to define the nature of a larger Twitter conversation around the COVID-19 vaccine and explored interaction patterns between Twitter users engaged in such a conversation. Results of this study show that mixed-emotions reactions and discussions about potential side effects and vaccine safety dominated the online conversation. Four main network clusters highlighted different groups of conversation stakeholders. This study findings emphasize the importance of Twitter surveillance and highlight conversational patterns and prevailing sentiments that dominate online social networks during a major health crisis.","PeriodicalId":47084,"journal":{"name":"Communication Research Reports","volume":"38 1","pages":"346 - 356"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communication Research Reports","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/08824096.2021.1983424","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

ABSTRACT Timely vaccination against COVID-19 can prevent many people from getting infected. However, given the disease novelty and fast vaccine development, some people are hesitant to vaccinate. Online social networks like Twitter produce huge amounts of public health information and may impact peoples’ vaccination decisions. Hence, it is important to understand the conversation around the COVID-19 vaccination through the lens of social media. The present study aimed to define the nature of a larger Twitter conversation around the COVID-19 vaccine and explored interaction patterns between Twitter users engaged in such a conversation. Results of this study show that mixed-emotions reactions and discussions about potential side effects and vaccine safety dominated the online conversation. Four main network clusters highlighted different groups of conversation stakeholders. This study findings emphasize the importance of Twitter surveillance and highlight conversational patterns and prevailing sentiments that dominate online social networks during a major health crisis.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
了解推特上关于COVID-19疫苗的在线对话:公共卫生危机中的疫苗犹豫
及时接种COVID-19疫苗可以防止许多人感染。然而,鉴于疾病的新颖性和疫苗的快速发展,一些人对接种疫苗犹豫不决。像推特这样的在线社交网络产生了大量的公共卫生信息,并可能影响人们的疫苗接种决定。因此,通过社交媒体了解围绕COVID-19疫苗接种的对话非常重要。本研究旨在定义围绕COVID-19疫苗的更大Twitter对话的性质,并探索参与此类对话的Twitter用户之间的互动模式。这项研究的结果表明,混合情绪的反应以及关于潜在副作用和疫苗安全性的讨论主导了在线对话。四个主要的网络集群突出了不同的会话利益相关者群体。这项研究结果强调了Twitter监控的重要性,并强调了在重大健康危机期间主导在线社交网络的对话模式和流行情绪。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
20
期刊最新文献
Extending the communication during sexual activity model: what role does sexual communication self-efficacy play? Conflict styles within individualistic, low power distance, and low context nations: a four nation comparison Science terms elicit ideological differences in message processing Development and validation of the commitment to social activism scale using the Thurstone scaling procedure Patient perceptions of healthcare provider (un)helpful approaches to explaining health information
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1