{"title":"FHM Humour: The “Heroic Couplet of Men and Stupidity”","authors":"S. Viljoen","doi":"10.1080/02500167.2023.2200960","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract FHM launched its first South African issue in 2000, thereby initiating a new readership into the culture of laddish humour. As an articulation of post-apartheid masculine interest, the magazine used humour in different ways to both push back against apartheid and reinforce its core ideologies. Laddishness, it is argued, provides a carnivalesque resistance to the dominant strains of white masculinity deemed to be aspirational by other men’s magazines at the time. Through a bawdy embrace of juvenile folly and foolishness, FHM South Africa seemed to use self-deprecation and effacement as a means of troubling the ambitious materialism and corporate mobility of the neoliberal masculinities promoted in, for instance, GQ. The question is whether laddish humour was a counterfoil to “serious”, neoconservative masculinities, especially in the early years of democracy, or whether it merely served to complicate and further entrench the project of masculine hegemony.","PeriodicalId":44378,"journal":{"name":"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research","volume":"49 1","pages":"1 - 19"},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2023-01-02","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Communicatio-South African Journal for Communication Theory and Research","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/02500167.2023.2200960","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"COMMUNICATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0
Abstract
Abstract FHM launched its first South African issue in 2000, thereby initiating a new readership into the culture of laddish humour. As an articulation of post-apartheid masculine interest, the magazine used humour in different ways to both push back against apartheid and reinforce its core ideologies. Laddishness, it is argued, provides a carnivalesque resistance to the dominant strains of white masculinity deemed to be aspirational by other men’s magazines at the time. Through a bawdy embrace of juvenile folly and foolishness, FHM South Africa seemed to use self-deprecation and effacement as a means of troubling the ambitious materialism and corporate mobility of the neoliberal masculinities promoted in, for instance, GQ. The question is whether laddish humour was a counterfoil to “serious”, neoconservative masculinities, especially in the early years of democracy, or whether it merely served to complicate and further entrench the project of masculine hegemony.