Analysis of Factors Affecting Safety Outcomes in Construction Projects: A Field Study in One of the Large Construction Projects in Iran

S. Ghiyasi, Milad Koushki Rad, A. Soltanzadeh, Mona Ghafourian, Hadi Najafiyan
{"title":"Analysis of Factors Affecting Safety Outcomes in Construction Projects: A Field Study in One of the Large Construction Projects in Iran","authors":"S. Ghiyasi, Milad Koushki Rad, A. Soltanzadeh, Mona Ghafourian, Hadi Najafiyan","doi":"10.18502/aoh.v6i3.10706","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: In addition to detrimental effects on economy and people, safety consequences could negatively affect the efficiency and productivity of construction projects. This study aims to analyze the factors affecting safety consequences in construction projects. \nMethod: This was a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2020 in a large construction project (a sewage treatment plant) in Tehran. The 250 people working in this construction project participated in this study. Data for this study were collected based on a safety parameter assessment checklist. Independent variables in this study were age and work experience, education, daily working hours, harmful physical and ergonomic factors, and unsafe practices. Analytical variables included Accident Frequency Rate (AFR) and Safe-T score. A multiple linear regression model and SPSS version 22.0 were used for data analysis. \nResults: Age and working experience of the participants were 35.8± 9.8 and 3.4± 1.7, respectively, and nearly half of them had high school diploma (47.6%). AFR for two consecutive years of 2019 and 2020, were 5.16 and 4.43 accidents, respectively. Safe-T-Score was calculated as – 0.011. The results of regression analysis revealed a significant relation (p<0.05) between Safe-T-score and working experience, daily working hours, unsafe practices, noise and thermal stress exposure, carrying and moving loads, and safety risk factors variables. \nConclusion: Results of this study indicated that although safety performance at the studied construction site was relatively favorable, several variables had an impact on the safety consequences of the project. Hence, the safety consequences of construction projects might benefit from the results of this study.     \n ","PeriodicalId":32672,"journal":{"name":"Archives of Occupational Health","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2022-09-20","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Archives of Occupational Health","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18502/aoh.v6i3.10706","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Background: In addition to detrimental effects on economy and people, safety consequences could negatively affect the efficiency and productivity of construction projects. This study aims to analyze the factors affecting safety consequences in construction projects. Method: This was a descriptive-analytical and cross-sectional study conducted in 2020 in a large construction project (a sewage treatment plant) in Tehran. The 250 people working in this construction project participated in this study. Data for this study were collected based on a safety parameter assessment checklist. Independent variables in this study were age and work experience, education, daily working hours, harmful physical and ergonomic factors, and unsafe practices. Analytical variables included Accident Frequency Rate (AFR) and Safe-T score. A multiple linear regression model and SPSS version 22.0 were used for data analysis. Results: Age and working experience of the participants were 35.8± 9.8 and 3.4± 1.7, respectively, and nearly half of them had high school diploma (47.6%). AFR for two consecutive years of 2019 and 2020, were 5.16 and 4.43 accidents, respectively. Safe-T-Score was calculated as – 0.011. The results of regression analysis revealed a significant relation (p<0.05) between Safe-T-score and working experience, daily working hours, unsafe practices, noise and thermal stress exposure, carrying and moving loads, and safety risk factors variables. Conclusion: Results of this study indicated that although safety performance at the studied construction site was relatively favorable, several variables had an impact on the safety consequences of the project. Hence, the safety consequences of construction projects might benefit from the results of this study.      
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
建设项目安全成果影响因素分析——以伊朗某大型建设项目为例
背景:除了对经济和人民产生不利影响外,安全后果还可能对建设项目的效率和生产力产生负面影响。本研究旨在分析影响建设项目安全后果的因素。方法:这是一项描述性分析和横断面研究,于2020年在德黑兰的一个大型建设项目(污水处理厂)中进行。参与该建设项目的250人参与了这项研究。本研究的数据是根据安全参数评估清单收集的。本研究的自变量为年龄和工作经验、教育程度、每日工作时间、有害的身体和人体工程学因素以及不安全的操作方法。分析变量包括事故率(AFR)和safety - t评分。采用多元线性回归模型和SPSS 22.0版本进行数据分析。结果:调查对象年龄为35.8±9.8岁,工作经历为3.4±1.7岁,高中学历占比近一半(47.6%)。AFR连续两年2019年和2020年,分别为5.16和4.43起事故。Safe-T-Score计算为- 0.011。回归分析结果显示,安全t得分与工作经验、日常工作时间、不安全操作、噪声和热应力暴露、搬运和移动负荷、安全危险因素变量之间存在显著相关(p<0.05)。结论:本研究结果表明,虽然所研究的施工现场的安全性能相对较好,但几个变量对项目的安全后果有影响。因此,建设项目的安全后果可能会受益于本研究的结果。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
24
审稿时长
6 weeks
期刊最新文献
Risk of Manual Handling and Prevalence of Musculoskeletal Disorders among Rice Mill Workers in Northern Iran Hand dermatitis, Prevalence and Risk Factors among Healthcare Workers during the COVID-19 Indoor Environmental Quality, Climate Change, and Life Quality The Relationship between the Environmental Noise Intensity, Feeling and Annoyance with the Shiftwork in the Emergency Department Domino Effects in Process Industries
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1