Firm Investment Behavior under Hyperinflation and Dollarization: A Case of Zimbabwe Listed Firms

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Iranian Economic Review Pub Date : 2021-05-28 DOI:10.22059/IER.2021.81554
Mbulawa Strike, F. N. Okurut, M. NtsosaMogale., N. Sinha
{"title":"Firm Investment Behavior under Hyperinflation and Dollarization: A Case of Zimbabwe Listed Firms","authors":"Mbulawa Strike, F. N. Okurut, M. NtsosaMogale., N. Sinha","doi":"10.22059/IER.2021.81554","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Zimbabwe’s experiences hyperinflation (2000-2008) and dollarization (2009-2019) has implications on the making of investment decisions. The uniqueness of these periods justifies the need for a critical analysis as decisions on whether or not to invest are sensitive to such structural changes. In view of this, the study uses the modified Tobin’s Q model to examine the main determinants of investment behavior. A dynamic and non-linear model is applied using data from a panel of 30 listed and non-financial firms for the period 2000 to 2016. The main determinants of investment decisions are managerial discretion or power, financial constraints, uncertainty and access to external sources of finance. Findings are sensitive to the period of analysis and consistent with the pecking order hypothesis. Interactions between investment expenditure and other corporate financial decisions are confirmed. Policy makers need to take a differentiated approach in making investment decisions. It is desirable to develop policies that are sensitive to prevailing market conditions; reduce financial constraints and remove informational inefficiencies to improve uptake of debt finance and other external funding sources. Monitoring of managerial decision making power will reduce levels of entrenchment and hence the agency problem. Firms should improve on future financial flexibility by taking less debt and a dynamic investment strategy that is sensitive to firm size is more plausible.","PeriodicalId":38289,"journal":{"name":"Iranian Economic Review","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-28","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Iranian Economic Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.22059/IER.2021.81554","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Zimbabwe’s experiences hyperinflation (2000-2008) and dollarization (2009-2019) has implications on the making of investment decisions. The uniqueness of these periods justifies the need for a critical analysis as decisions on whether or not to invest are sensitive to such structural changes. In view of this, the study uses the modified Tobin’s Q model to examine the main determinants of investment behavior. A dynamic and non-linear model is applied using data from a panel of 30 listed and non-financial firms for the period 2000 to 2016. The main determinants of investment decisions are managerial discretion or power, financial constraints, uncertainty and access to external sources of finance. Findings are sensitive to the period of analysis and consistent with the pecking order hypothesis. Interactions between investment expenditure and other corporate financial decisions are confirmed. Policy makers need to take a differentiated approach in making investment decisions. It is desirable to develop policies that are sensitive to prevailing market conditions; reduce financial constraints and remove informational inefficiencies to improve uptake of debt finance and other external funding sources. Monitoring of managerial decision making power will reduce levels of entrenchment and hence the agency problem. Firms should improve on future financial flexibility by taking less debt and a dynamic investment strategy that is sensitive to firm size is more plausible.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
恶性通货膨胀和美元化下的企业投资行为:以津巴布韦上市公司为例
津巴布韦经历的恶性通货膨胀(2000-2008年)和美元化(2009-2019年)对投资决策产生了影响。这些时期的独特性证明了进行批判性分析的必要性,因为是否投资的决策对这种结构变化很敏感。有鉴于此,本研究采用修正的托宾Q模型来检验投资行为的主要决定因素。利用2000年至2016年期间30家上市和非金融公司的数据,应用了一个动态和非线性模型。投资决策的主要决定因素是管理自由裁量权或权力、财务约束、不确定性和获得外部资金来源。研究结果对分析周期很敏感,并且与等级假设一致。投资支出和其他公司财务决策之间的相互作用得到了证实。决策者在做出投资决策时需要采取差异化的方法。制定对当前市场条件敏感的政策是可取的;减少财务约束,消除信息低效,以提高债务融资和其他外部资金来源的利用率。对管理决策权的监督将降低根深蒂固的程度,从而减少代理问题。企业应该通过减少债务来提高未来的财务灵活性,而对企业规模敏感的动态投资策略更为合理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Iranian Economic Review
Iranian Economic Review Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics, Econometrics and Finance (all)
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
The Role of Institutional Quality in the Impact of Oil Rents on Financial Development in Brazil and Norway Interaction between Financial Cycles and Business Cycles in Iran: A Bayesian Approach The Threshold and Asymmetric Effects of Financial Development on Economic Growth in BRICS Countries: Evidence from Panel Threshold-ARDL Forecasting Gasoline Consumption in Iran using Deep Learning Approaches Identifying the Moderating Role of Income Smoothing and Credit Quality towards Corporate Governance and Determinants
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1