Mind the Gap: Towards Determining Which Collocations to Teach

IF 0.4 Q4 LINGUISTICS Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus-SPiL Plus Pub Date : 2019-04-05 DOI:10.5842/56-0-775
Déogratias Nizonkiza, K. V. D. Poel
{"title":"Mind the Gap: Towards Determining Which Collocations to Teach","authors":"Déogratias Nizonkiza, K. V. D. Poel","doi":"10.5842/56-0-775","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Collocations form part of formulaic language use that is considered by many scholars as central to communication (Henriksen 2013; Wray 2002). Today, most scholars agree that teaching collocations to second and/or foreign language users (henceforth “L2 students”) is a must. This study offers a reflection on the directions L2 researchers and teachers may explore, and that could contribute to modelling the teaching of collocations or at least spark the debate on this issue. The fundamental point raised here is the extent to which pedagogy may be informed by knowing the most common lexical collocations (combinations of content words) and using frequency of collocates as a key factor in selecting which collocations to bring to learners’ attention. The results from this study indicate that out of the eight different lexical collocations, adjective+noun and verb+noun collocations are the most common, and should therefore be introduced first. Furthermore, most collocates (“co-occurring words” in Sinclair’s (1991) terms) come from the 1,000 and 2,000 most frequent words. Therefore, this study suggests that the same way that “[u]sing the computational approach as a starting point makes it possible to distinguish between collocations of varying frequency of use” (Henriksen 2013: 32), frequency may be used to select the target words and their collocates once collocations have been identified. This could potentially contribute to addressing the issue of selection criteria of which collocations to teach.","PeriodicalId":42187,"journal":{"name":"Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus-SPiL Plus","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2019-04-05","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Stellenbosch Papers in Linguistics Plus-SPiL Plus","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.5842/56-0-775","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Collocations form part of formulaic language use that is considered by many scholars as central to communication (Henriksen 2013; Wray 2002). Today, most scholars agree that teaching collocations to second and/or foreign language users (henceforth “L2 students”) is a must. This study offers a reflection on the directions L2 researchers and teachers may explore, and that could contribute to modelling the teaching of collocations or at least spark the debate on this issue. The fundamental point raised here is the extent to which pedagogy may be informed by knowing the most common lexical collocations (combinations of content words) and using frequency of collocates as a key factor in selecting which collocations to bring to learners’ attention. The results from this study indicate that out of the eight different lexical collocations, adjective+noun and verb+noun collocations are the most common, and should therefore be introduced first. Furthermore, most collocates (“co-occurring words” in Sinclair’s (1991) terms) come from the 1,000 and 2,000 most frequent words. Therefore, this study suggests that the same way that “[u]sing the computational approach as a starting point makes it possible to distinguish between collocations of varying frequency of use” (Henriksen 2013: 32), frequency may be used to select the target words and their collocates once collocations have been identified. This could potentially contribute to addressing the issue of selection criteria of which collocations to teach.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
注意差距:决定教哪种搭配
搭配是公式化语言使用的一部分,许多学者认为这是沟通的核心(Henriksen 2013;Wray 2002)。如今,大多数学者都认为,必须向第二语言和/或外语使用者(以下简称“二语学生”)教授搭配。这项研究对二语研究人员和教师可能探索的方向进行了反思,这可能有助于为搭配教学建模,或者至少引发关于这个问题的辩论。这里提出的基本观点是,通过了解最常见的词汇搭配(内容词的组合),并将搭配频率作为选择引起学习者注意的搭配的关键因素,可以在多大程度上影响教育学。研究结果表明,在八种不同的词汇搭配中,形容词+名词和动词+名词的搭配最为常见,因此应首先介绍。此外,大多数并置词(Sinclair(1991)术语中的“共现词”)来自1000和2000个最频繁的单词。因此,这项研究表明,“以计算方法为起点,可以区分不同使用频率的搭配”(Henriksen 2013:32),一旦确定了搭配,频率就可以用来选择目标词及其搭配。这可能有助于解决教学搭配的选择标准问题。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
0
审稿时长
24 weeks
期刊最新文献
The role of vowel length and pitch in Xhosa sentence type intonation The rise and fall of Serial Verb Constructions: Finale Serial Verb Constructions in North-West Semitic languages: From a synchronic radiation back to the ‘Big Bang’ Juncture-Verb Constructions in Northeastern Kalahari Khoe: A comparative perspective The earliest Serial Verb Constructions in Aramaic? Verb-verb constructions with hlk ‘go’ and ʔth ‘come’ in Old Aramaic
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1