The role of group identification, self- and collective efficacy on secondary traumatic stress and general health in a sample of emergency medical service volunteers

IF 2.2 3区 心理学 Q3 PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL Journal of Applied Social Psychology Pub Date : 2022-11-29 DOI:10.1111/jasp.12946
Luca Caricati, Martina De vito, Chiara Panari
{"title":"The role of group identification, self- and collective efficacy on secondary traumatic stress and general health in a sample of emergency medical service volunteers","authors":"Luca Caricati,&nbsp;Martina De vito,&nbsp;Chiara Panari","doi":"10.1111/jasp.12946","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<p>This paper reports the results of a web-based survey on the relationship between group identification, secondary traumatic stress, and psychological distress in a sample of Italian emergency medical service volunteers. The theoretical foundation of this research was based on the social cure approach that suggests that group identification can increase people's wellbeing by enhancing the sense of social support and mastery. Responses from 1214 volunteers (50% men) were collected and structural equation modeling was performed to assess direct and indirect effect of group identification on both secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress. Results supported expectations, and indicated that group identification was associated with decreased secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress: this relation was both direct and mediated by self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Self-efficacy and collective efficacy completely mediated the relationship between group identification and secondary traumatic stress, while mediation was partial for the relationship between group identification and psychological distress. Moreover, our findings revealed that collective efficacy had a higher impact on psychological distress than on secondary traumatic stress. Self-efficacy, instead, had a significant negative effect on both secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress. Finally, secondary traumatic stress had a strong relationship with psychological distress. The practical implications for volunteers' wellbeing and volunteer association are discussed in view of the need to improve collective positive resources.</p>","PeriodicalId":48404,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-29","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Applied Social Psychology","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/jasp.12946","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"PSYCHOLOGY, SOCIAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper reports the results of a web-based survey on the relationship between group identification, secondary traumatic stress, and psychological distress in a sample of Italian emergency medical service volunteers. The theoretical foundation of this research was based on the social cure approach that suggests that group identification can increase people's wellbeing by enhancing the sense of social support and mastery. Responses from 1214 volunteers (50% men) were collected and structural equation modeling was performed to assess direct and indirect effect of group identification on both secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress. Results supported expectations, and indicated that group identification was associated with decreased secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress: this relation was both direct and mediated by self-efficacy and collective efficacy. Self-efficacy and collective efficacy completely mediated the relationship between group identification and secondary traumatic stress, while mediation was partial for the relationship between group identification and psychological distress. Moreover, our findings revealed that collective efficacy had a higher impact on psychological distress than on secondary traumatic stress. Self-efficacy, instead, had a significant negative effect on both secondary traumatic stress and psychological distress. Finally, secondary traumatic stress had a strong relationship with psychological distress. The practical implications for volunteers' wellbeing and volunteer association are discussed in view of the need to improve collective positive resources.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
群体认同、自我效能和集体效能对紧急医疗服务志愿者继发性创伤应激和总体健康的影响
本文报告了意大利紧急医疗服务志愿者群体认同、继发性创伤应激和心理困扰之间关系的网络调查结果。本研究的理论基础是基于社会治愈方法,该方法认为群体认同可以通过增强社会支持感和掌控感来提高人们的幸福感。本研究收集了1214名志愿者(50%为男性)的反馈,并采用结构方程模型来评估群体认同对继发性创伤应激和心理困扰的直接和间接影响。结果支持预期,表明群体认同与减少继发性创伤应激和心理困扰相关,这种关系是由自我效能感和集体效能感直接介导的。自我效能感和集体效能感在群体认同与继发性创伤应激之间起完全中介作用,在群体认同与心理困扰之间起部分中介作用。此外,我们的研究结果显示,集体效能对心理困扰的影响大于对继发性创伤应激的影响。相反,自我效能感对继发性创伤应激和心理困扰都有显著的负面影响。最后,继发性创伤应激与心理困扰有密切关系。鉴于需要改善集体积极资源,讨论了对志愿者福利和志愿者协会的实际影响。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.30
自引率
4.00%
发文量
95
期刊介绍: Published since 1971, Journal of Applied Social Psychology is a monthly publication devoted to applications of experimental behavioral science research to problems of society (e.g., organizational and leadership psychology, safety, health, and gender issues; perceptions of war and natural hazards; jury deliberation; performance, AIDS, cancer, heart disease, exercise, and sports).
期刊最新文献
Using self‐determination theory to link empathy and voluntary health behaviors Issue Information Belief in conspiracy theories and satisfaction in interpersonal relationships Workplace loneliness: Relationships with abstract entities as substitutes for peer relationships Motivated perception of leaders when perceived political party continuity is low: The mediating role of self‐uncertainty
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1