Recoupled: A simulation tool for renewable energy communities coupling electric and thermal energies

Q4 Economics, Econometrics and Finance Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment Pub Date : 2023-05-01 DOI:10.3280/efe2022-002003
Francesco Gullí, P. Lazzeroni, Gianmarco Lorenti, I. Mariuzzo, Francesco Moraglio, M. Repetto
{"title":"Recoupled: A simulation tool for renewable energy communities coupling electric and thermal energies","authors":"Francesco Gullí, P. Lazzeroni, Gianmarco Lorenti, I. Mariuzzo, Francesco Moraglio, M. Repetto","doi":"10.3280/efe2022-002003","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Renewable energy communities (RECs) are legal entities where citizens, small-to-medium en- terprises (SMEs) and local authorities join to manage cooperatively energy from renewable sources. Since the regulation requires to evaluate energy fluxes on the hour base, the operative control and performance assessment of these new energy hubs become complex and require the handling of data such as production from renewable energy sources (RES) and end user con- sumption, that are intrinsically affected by uncertainties. In this contribution, an optimization tool for the operational management of a REC is proposed. RECs can contain renewable energy technologies (photovoltaic or solar thermal panels, biofuel burners), electric, heating and cooling end users and coupling components (e.g., heat pumps). The tool can be used at the planning level to compare different REC configurations based on their performances, assuming optimal man- agement of the available technologies. In this paper, the tool is tested in the simulation of three case studies of collective self-consumption (that in Italy is a REC where all end users are in the same building), located at different latitudes of the Italian country.","PeriodicalId":38445,"journal":{"name":"Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment","volume":"1 1","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3280/efe2022-002003","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Renewable energy communities (RECs) are legal entities where citizens, small-to-medium en- terprises (SMEs) and local authorities join to manage cooperatively energy from renewable sources. Since the regulation requires to evaluate energy fluxes on the hour base, the operative control and performance assessment of these new energy hubs become complex and require the handling of data such as production from renewable energy sources (RES) and end user con- sumption, that are intrinsically affected by uncertainties. In this contribution, an optimization tool for the operational management of a REC is proposed. RECs can contain renewable energy technologies (photovoltaic or solar thermal panels, biofuel burners), electric, heating and cooling end users and coupling components (e.g., heat pumps). The tool can be used at the planning level to compare different REC configurations based on their performances, assuming optimal man- agement of the available technologies. In this paper, the tool is tested in the simulation of three case studies of collective self-consumption (that in Italy is a REC where all end users are in the same building), located at different latitudes of the Italian country.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
耦合:可再生能源社区耦合电力和热能的模拟工具
可再生能源社区是公民、中小企业和地方当局共同管理可再生能源的法律实体。由于该法规要求以小时为基础评估能源通量,这些新能源中心的运行控制和性能评估变得复杂,需要处理可再生能源生产和最终用户消费等数据,这些数据本质上受到不确定性的影响。在这篇文章中,提出了一种用于REC运营管理的优化工具。REC可以包含可再生能源技术(光伏或太阳能热电池板、生物燃料燃烧器)、电力、供暖和制冷终端用户以及耦合组件(如热泵)。该工具可用于规划级别,根据不同REC配置的性能对其进行比较,前提是对可用技术进行最佳管理。在本文中,该工具在三个集体自我消费案例研究的模拟中进行了测试(在意大利,这是一个REC,所有最终用户都在同一栋楼里),位于意大利不同的纬度。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment
Economics and Policy of Energy and the Environment Economics, Econometrics and Finance-Economics and Econometrics
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
8
期刊最新文献
An assessment of the Iberian Exception to control electricity prices Mapping the empirical relationship between environmental performance and social preferences: Evidence from macro data Public perception of residential solar energy in Minnesota's urban areas Strategy for the implementation of sustainable green fuels in Indonesia Is reuse always better than recycling? A critical analysis of the proposed European Regulation on Packaging and Packaging Waste and a debunking of its Impact Assessment study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1