The effect of board characteristics on tax aggressiveness: the case of listed entities in Sri Lanka

IF 3.2 Q1 BUSINESS, FINANCE Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies Pub Date : 2023-08-18 DOI:10.1108/jaee-08-2022-0224
M. Shamil, D. Gooneratne, Dasitha Gunathilaka, Junaid M. Shaikh
{"title":"The effect of board characteristics on tax aggressiveness: the case of listed entities in Sri Lanka","authors":"M. Shamil, D. Gooneratne, Dasitha Gunathilaka, Junaid M. Shaikh","doi":"10.1108/jaee-08-2022-0224","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeThis study examines the effect of board characteristics on the tax aggressiveness of listed companies on the Colombo Stock Exchange in Sri Lanka.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consists of 264 firm-year observations of non-financial listed companies in Sri Lanka from 2014 to 2019. The dynamic panel system GMM technique was used to test the hypotheses, and further analyses were performed using the propensity score matching technique.FindingsAll four effective tax rate measures' mean values were lower than the statutory tax rate, indicating the likelihood of tax planning. Whether board attributes are likely to mitigate tax aggressiveness is uncertain because the results are inconsistent and depend on the ETR measure. Similarly, the logistic regression results derived using the PSM approach are inconsistent, suggesting that board characteristics may have a limited effect on tax aggressiveness. Hence, the corporate governance-tax aggressiveness nexus is limited in the case of Sri Lanka.Research limitations/implicationsThis investigation is limited to non-financial listed companies in Sri Lanka and incorporates only four tax aggressiveness measures. Findings are imperative for policymakers, regulators, and professional bodies to improve corporate governance codes and rules to enhance organisational transparency toward corporate tax payments.Social implicationsAggressive tax planning by companies will reduce government tax revenue, hinder social progress, and cause public mistrust of large corporations and institutions.Originality/valueThis study provides insight into the nexus between corporate governance and tax aggressiveness in a middle-income economy in South Asia hit by an economic crisis where tax revenue has fallen and tax enforcement is weak.","PeriodicalId":45702,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":3.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-08-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jaee-08-2022-0224","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q1","JCRName":"BUSINESS, FINANCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

PurposeThis study examines the effect of board characteristics on the tax aggressiveness of listed companies on the Colombo Stock Exchange in Sri Lanka.Design/methodology/approachThe sample consists of 264 firm-year observations of non-financial listed companies in Sri Lanka from 2014 to 2019. The dynamic panel system GMM technique was used to test the hypotheses, and further analyses were performed using the propensity score matching technique.FindingsAll four effective tax rate measures' mean values were lower than the statutory tax rate, indicating the likelihood of tax planning. Whether board attributes are likely to mitigate tax aggressiveness is uncertain because the results are inconsistent and depend on the ETR measure. Similarly, the logistic regression results derived using the PSM approach are inconsistent, suggesting that board characteristics may have a limited effect on tax aggressiveness. Hence, the corporate governance-tax aggressiveness nexus is limited in the case of Sri Lanka.Research limitations/implicationsThis investigation is limited to non-financial listed companies in Sri Lanka and incorporates only four tax aggressiveness measures. Findings are imperative for policymakers, regulators, and professional bodies to improve corporate governance codes and rules to enhance organisational transparency toward corporate tax payments.Social implicationsAggressive tax planning by companies will reduce government tax revenue, hinder social progress, and cause public mistrust of large corporations and institutions.Originality/valueThis study provides insight into the nexus between corporate governance and tax aggressiveness in a middle-income economy in South Asia hit by an economic crisis where tax revenue has fallen and tax enforcement is weak.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
董事会特征对税收侵略性的影响:以斯里兰卡上市公司为例
目的本研究考察了董事会特征对斯里兰卡科伦坡证券交易所上市公司税收积极性的影响。设计/方法/方法样本包括2014年至2019年斯里兰卡非金融上市公司264个公司年度的观察结果。使用动态面板系统GMM技术来检验假设,并使用倾向得分匹配技术进行进一步分析。发现所有四项有效税率指标的平均值都低于法定税率,这表明制定税收计划的可能性。董事会属性是否有可能减轻税收侵略性尚不确定,因为结果不一致,取决于ETR衡量标准。同样,使用PSM方法得出的逻辑回归结果也不一致,这表明董事会特征对税收积极性的影响可能有限。因此,在斯里兰卡的案例中,公司治理与税收攻击性的关系是有限的。研究局限性/含义本调查仅限于斯里兰卡的非金融上市公司,仅包含四项税收攻击性措施。政策制定者、监管机构和专业机构必须改进公司治理准则和规则,以提高公司纳税的组织透明度。社会影响公司激进的税收计划将减少政府税收,阻碍社会进步,并导致公众对大公司和机构的不信任。独创性/价值这项研究深入了解了南亚中等收入经济体的公司治理与税收积极性之间的关系,该经济体受到经济危机的打击,税收下降,税收执法不力。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
5.80
自引率
13.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Board monitoring and corporate disclosure: the role of the institutional environment and firm-level governance Governance disclosure quality and firm performance: empirical evidence from an emerging economy School ties between external auditors and audit committee: evidence from the audit fee in Indonesia The role of corporate governance on corporate tax avoidance: a developing country perspective Enterprise risk management, corporate governance and insurers risk-taking behaviour in South Africa: evidence from a linear and threshold analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1