Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and exercise tolerance in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review

IF 0.8 Q4 REHABILITATION Physical Therapy Reviews Pub Date : 2022-01-22 DOI:10.1080/10833196.2022.2027658
Nicholas DePietro, Jennifer Rinaldi, Courtney Nieschwitz, H. Robinson, Alysha A. Walter
{"title":"Effect of pulmonary rehabilitation on dyspnea and exercise tolerance in patients with interstitial lung disease: a systematic review","authors":"Nicholas DePietro, Jennifer Rinaldi, Courtney Nieschwitz, H. Robinson, Alysha A. Walter","doi":"10.1080/10833196.2022.2027658","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Purpose Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and exercise training have proven effective for dyspnea and exercise tolerance for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but little is known of its effect on interstitial lung disease (ILD). There is a need in the literature to systematically review the effect of these interventions on individuals with ILD concerning exercise tolerance and/or dyspnea. Methods This systematic review utilized PRISMA guidelines to conduct the reporting of the findings and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020186513). Databases searched included: PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science. Independent screening was performed by two authors with a third acting as a tiebreaker when consensus was not reached. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were included with subjects over 18 years old with a diagnosis of ILD who complete either pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) or exercise training interventions and included the six minutes walk test (6MWT) to measure exercise tolerance and/or outcomes to measure dyspnea. Studies were also included if they were published between 2008 through the date of study collection. A quality assessment was then performed on each RCT using the PEDro score with those with a rating of six or greater being included. Results Eight studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in this review with statistical significance reported in seven of the studies for short-term improvements and in two of the studies for long-term improvements in exercise tolerance. Six reported statistical significance for short-term improvements in dyspnea and two studies reported statistical significance for long-term improvements of dyspnea. Conclusion Individuals with ILD demonstrate improvements in exercise tolerance and symptoms of dyspnea after participating in PR or exercise training interventions.","PeriodicalId":46541,"journal":{"name":"Physical Therapy Reviews","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Physical Therapy Reviews","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/10833196.2022.2027658","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"REHABILITATION","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract Purpose Pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) and exercise training have proven effective for dyspnea and exercise tolerance for individuals with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) but little is known of its effect on interstitial lung disease (ILD). There is a need in the literature to systematically review the effect of these interventions on individuals with ILD concerning exercise tolerance and/or dyspnea. Methods This systematic review utilized PRISMA guidelines to conduct the reporting of the findings and was registered with PROSPERO (CRD42020186513). Databases searched included: PubMed, CINAHL, ProQuest, Scopus, and Web of Science. Independent screening was performed by two authors with a third acting as a tiebreaker when consensus was not reached. Randomized control trials (RCTs) were included with subjects over 18 years old with a diagnosis of ILD who complete either pulmonary rehabilitation (PR) or exercise training interventions and included the six minutes walk test (6MWT) to measure exercise tolerance and/or outcomes to measure dyspnea. Studies were also included if they were published between 2008 through the date of study collection. A quality assessment was then performed on each RCT using the PEDro score with those with a rating of six or greater being included. Results Eight studies meeting inclusion criteria were included in this review with statistical significance reported in seven of the studies for short-term improvements and in two of the studies for long-term improvements in exercise tolerance. Six reported statistical significance for short-term improvements in dyspnea and two studies reported statistical significance for long-term improvements of dyspnea. Conclusion Individuals with ILD demonstrate improvements in exercise tolerance and symptoms of dyspnea after participating in PR or exercise training interventions.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
肺康复对间质性肺病患者呼吸困难和运动耐受性的影响:一项系统综述
摘要目的肺康复(PR)和运动训练已被证明对慢性阻塞性肺病(COPD)患者的呼吸困难和运动耐受性有效,但对其对间质性肺病(ILD)的影响知之甚少。文献中有必要系统地回顾这些干预措施对ILD患者运动耐受性和/或呼吸困难的影响。方法本系统综述利用PRISMA指南对研究结果进行报告,并在PROSPERO注册(CRD42020186513)。搜索的数据库包括:PubMed、CINAHL、ProQuest、Scopus和Web of Science。两位作者进行了独立筛选,当没有达成共识时,第三位作者充当了决胜局。随机对照试验(RCT)包括18岁以上的受试者 岁,诊断为ILD,完成肺部康复(PR)或运动训练干预,并包括6分钟步行测试(6MWT)以测量运动耐受性和/或结果以测量呼吸困难。如果研究在2008年至研究收集日期之间发表,也包括在内。然后使用PEDro评分对每个随机对照试验进行质量评估,其中包括评分为6分或更高的评分。结果符合纳入标准的8项研究被纳入本综述,其中7项短期改善研究和2项长期改善运动耐受性研究具有统计学意义。6项研究报告了呼吸困难短期改善的统计学意义,2项研究报告呼吸困难长期改善的统计学重要性。结论ILD患者在参与PR或运动训练干预后,运动耐受性和呼吸困难症状均有改善。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Physical Therapy Reviews
Physical Therapy Reviews REHABILITATION-
CiteScore
1.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
26
期刊介绍: Physical Therapy Reviews is an international journal which aims to publish contemporary reviews, discussion papers and editorials within physical therapy, and in those basic and clinical sciences which are the basis of physical therapy. The journal is aimed at all those involved in research, teaching and practice within the area of physical therapy. Reviews (both descriptive and systematic) are invited in the following areas, which reflect the breadth and diversity of practice within physical therapy: •neurological rehabilitation •movement and exercise •orthopaedics and rheumatology •manual therapy and massage •sports medicine •measurement •chest physiotherapy •electrotherapeutics •obstetrics and gynaecology •complementary therapies •professional issues •musculoskeletal rehabilitation
期刊最新文献
The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of tests used to assess the effects of power training in older adults: a systematic review Physical therapy treatment interventions and the effects thereof on clinical outcomes when addressing intra-pleural abnormalities in patients with trauma: protocol for a systematic review Motivational modulation enhances movement performance in Parkinson’s disease: a systematic review What influences patient decision making after anterior cruciate ligament injury in Australia; an internet survey What is the contribution of latissimus dorsi to trunk movement and control? A systematic review and meta-analysis
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1