Agreement between Azithromycin and Erythromycin to Determine Inducible Clindamycin-Resistant Phenotypes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates

IF 0.9 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Journal of Laboratory Physicians Pub Date : 2023-07-18 DOI:10.1055/s-0043-1771244
N. Goyal, N. Singh
{"title":"Agreement between Azithromycin and Erythromycin to Determine Inducible Clindamycin-Resistant Phenotypes in Staphylococcus aureus Isolates","authors":"N. Goyal, N. Singh","doi":"10.1055/s-0043-1771244","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Objectives  To evaluate agreement in the detection of inducible clindamycin resistance by test method using azithromycin disk with reference method using erythromycin disk and to determine prevalence of inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotypes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Materials and Methods  A total of 133 nonduplicate isolates of S. aureus from clinical samples were included in this prospective study. Agreement between erythromycin (reference method) and azithromycin (test method) disks for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus isolates was assessed. Statistical Analysis  Chi-square test was used for analyzing categorical variables ( p  < 0.05 was considered significant). Results  The prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSB) was 15.8%. A 100% agreement was recorded between reference and test methods for detecting inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotypes. For the determination of constitutive-resistant phenotypes (cMLSB) among S. aureus isolates, the test method demonstrated an agreement of 94.1%. Conclusion  The present study demonstrated an agreement in the identification of inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotypes among S. aureus isolates by both erythromycin and azithromycin disks.","PeriodicalId":16149,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-18","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Laboratory Physicians","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0043-1771244","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Objectives  To evaluate agreement in the detection of inducible clindamycin resistance by test method using azithromycin disk with reference method using erythromycin disk and to determine prevalence of inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotypes among Staphylococcus aureus isolates. Materials and Methods  A total of 133 nonduplicate isolates of S. aureus from clinical samples were included in this prospective study. Agreement between erythromycin (reference method) and azithromycin (test method) disks for detection of inducible clindamycin resistance in S. aureus isolates was assessed. Statistical Analysis  Chi-square test was used for analyzing categorical variables ( p  < 0.05 was considered significant). Results  The prevalence of inducible clindamycin resistance (iMLSB) was 15.8%. A 100% agreement was recorded between reference and test methods for detecting inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotypes. For the determination of constitutive-resistant phenotypes (cMLSB) among S. aureus isolates, the test method demonstrated an agreement of 94.1%. Conclusion  The present study demonstrated an agreement in the identification of inducible clindamycin-resistant phenotypes among S. aureus isolates by both erythromycin and azithromycin disks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
阿奇霉素和红霉素测定金黄色葡萄球菌诱导耐药表型的一致性
摘要目的评价阿奇霉素圆盘法与红霉素圆盘法检测克林霉素诱导型耐药的一致性,了解金黄色葡萄球菌中克林霉素诱导型耐药表型的流行情况。材料与方法对133株临床分离的非重复金黄色葡萄球菌进行前瞻性研究。比较红霉素(参比法)与阿奇霉素(试验法)检测金黄色葡萄球菌诱导型克林霉素耐药性的一致性。分类变量分析采用卡方检验(p < 0.05)。结果诱导型克林霉素耐药(iMLSB)阳性率为15.8%。在检测可诱导克林霉素耐药表型的参考方法和试验方法之间记录了100%的一致性。金黄色葡萄球菌组成耐药表型(cMLSB)的检测结果表明,该方法的一致性为94.1%。结论用红霉素和阿奇霉素圆盘鉴定金黄色葡萄球菌可诱导克林霉素耐药表型是一致的。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Laboratory Physicians
Journal of Laboratory Physicians MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
99
审稿时长
31 weeks
期刊最新文献
Experience of rigorous practice of antimicrobial stewardship program and its impact on antibiotic consumption A new era for Journal of Laboratory Physicians Sensitivity and specificity of newly generated monoclonal antibodies to detect novel antigens of Mycobacterium tuberculosis for the diagnosis of all forms of tuberculosis Martin’s formula is best to calculate low-density lipoprotein cholesterol Performance of modified colistin broth disc elution vis-a-vis broth microdilution method for susceptibility testing of Enterobacterales
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1