Diagnosing Chinese EFL learners’ writing ability using polytomous cognitive diagnostic models

IF 2.2 1区 文学 0 LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS Language Testing Pub Date : 2023-05-26 DOI:10.1177/02655322231162840
Xiaoting Shi, Xiaomei Ma, Wenbo Du, Xuliang Gao
{"title":"Diagnosing Chinese EFL learners’ writing ability using polytomous cognitive diagnostic models","authors":"Xiaoting Shi, Xiaomei Ma, Wenbo Du, Xuliang Gao","doi":"10.1177/02655322231162840","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) intends to identify learners’ strengths and weaknesses in latent cognitive attributes to provide personalized remedial instructions. Previous CDA studies on English as a Foreign Language (EFL)/English as a Second Language (ESL) writing have adopted dichotomous cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) to analyze data from checklists using simple yes/no judgments. Compared to descriptors with multiple levels, descriptors with only yes/no judgments were considered too absolute, potentially resulting in misjudgment of learners’ writing ability. However, few studies have used polytomous CDMs to analyze graded response data from rating scales to diagnose writing ability. This study applied polytomous CDMs to diagnose 1166 EFL learners’ writing performance scored with a three-level rating scale. The sG-DINA model was selected after comparing model-data fit statistics of multiple polytomous CDMs. The results of classification accuracy indices and item discrimination indices further demonstrated that sG-DINA had good performance on identifying learners’ strengths and weaknesses. The generated diagnostic information at group and individual levels was further synthesized into a personalized diagnostic report, although its usefulness still requires further investigation. The findings provided evidence for the feasibility of applying polytomous CDM in EFL writing assessment.","PeriodicalId":17928,"journal":{"name":"Language Testing","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":2.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-05-26","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Language Testing","FirstCategoryId":"98","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/02655322231162840","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"文学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"LANGUAGE & LINGUISTICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Cognitive diagnostic assessment (CDA) intends to identify learners’ strengths and weaknesses in latent cognitive attributes to provide personalized remedial instructions. Previous CDA studies on English as a Foreign Language (EFL)/English as a Second Language (ESL) writing have adopted dichotomous cognitive diagnostic models (CDMs) to analyze data from checklists using simple yes/no judgments. Compared to descriptors with multiple levels, descriptors with only yes/no judgments were considered too absolute, potentially resulting in misjudgment of learners’ writing ability. However, few studies have used polytomous CDMs to analyze graded response data from rating scales to diagnose writing ability. This study applied polytomous CDMs to diagnose 1166 EFL learners’ writing performance scored with a three-level rating scale. The sG-DINA model was selected after comparing model-data fit statistics of multiple polytomous CDMs. The results of classification accuracy indices and item discrimination indices further demonstrated that sG-DINA had good performance on identifying learners’ strengths and weaknesses. The generated diagnostic information at group and individual levels was further synthesized into a personalized diagnostic report, although its usefulness still requires further investigation. The findings provided evidence for the feasibility of applying polytomous CDM in EFL writing assessment.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
运用多元认知诊断模型诊断中国英语学习者的写作能力
认知诊断评估(CDA)旨在识别学习者在潜在认知属性方面的优势和劣势,以提供个性化的补救指导。先前关于英语作为外语(EFL)/英语作为第二语言(ESL)写作的CDA研究采用了二分法认知诊断模型(CDM),使用简单的是/否判断来分析检查表中的数据。与具有多个级别的描述符相比,只有是/否判断的描述符被认为过于绝对,可能导致对学习者写作能力的误判。然而,很少有研究使用多模CDM来分析评分量表中的分级反应数据,以诊断写作能力。本研究应用多模CDMs对1166名英语学习者的写作成绩进行了三级评定。在比较了多个多面体CDM的模型数据拟合统计量后,选择了sG DINA模型。分类准确度指数和项目辨别指数的结果进一步表明,sGDINA在识别学习者的长处和短处方面表现良好。生成的组和个人层面的诊断信息被进一步合成为个性化诊断报告,尽管其有用性仍需进一步研究。研究结果为多元CDM应用于英语写作评估的可行性提供了依据。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Language Testing
Language Testing Multiple-
CiteScore
6.70
自引率
9.80%
发文量
35
期刊介绍: Language Testing is a fully peer reviewed international journal that publishes original research and review articles on language testing and assessment. It provides a forum for the exchange of ideas and information between people working in the fields of first and second language testing and assessment. This includes researchers and practitioners in EFL and ESL testing, and assessment in child language acquisition and language pathology. In addition, special attention is focused on issues of testing theory, experimental investigations, and the following up of practical implications.
期刊最新文献
Can language test providers do more to support open science? A response to Winke Considerations to promote and accelerate Open Science: A response to Winke Evaluating the impact of nonverbal behavior on language ability ratings Sharing, collaborating, and building trust: How Open Science advances language testing Open Science in language assessment research contexts: A reply to Winke
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1