Mortality prediction of mitral valve replacement surgery by machine learning

IF 0.2 Q4 CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS Research in Cardiovascular Medicine Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4103/rcm.rcm_50_21
Marziyeh HosseiniNezhad, M. Langarizadeh, S. Hosseini
{"title":"Mortality prediction of mitral valve replacement surgery by machine learning","authors":"Marziyeh HosseiniNezhad, M. Langarizadeh, S. Hosseini","doi":"10.4103/rcm.rcm_50_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Background: Mitral valve replacement procedure has increased in the Iran over the last years. For optimization of the results, as the other procedure, it needs statistical evaluation of the results, and then a system for the prediction of outcome. Hence, in this study, we generate a machine learning (ML)-based model to predict in-hospital mortality after isolated mitral valve replacement (IMVR). Materials and Methods: The patients who underwent IMVR from February 2005 to August 2016 were identified in a single tertiary heart hospital. Data were retrospectively gathered including baseline characteristics, echocardiographic and surgical features, and patient's outcome. Prediction models for in-hospital mortality were obtained using five supervised ML classifiers including: logistic regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support-vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Results: A total of 1200 IMVRs were analyzed in our study. The study population was randomly divided into a training set (n = 840) and a testing set (n = 360). The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.2%. LR model had the best discrimination for 22 variables in predicting mortality after IMVR, with area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity of 0.68, 0.73, and 0.58, respectively. A LDA model had an (AUC) of 0.73, compared to 0.56 for SVM, 0.51 for KNN, and 0.5 for MLP. Conclusions: We developed a robust ML-derived model to predict in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing IMVR. This model is promising for decision-making and deserves further clinical validation.","PeriodicalId":21031,"journal":{"name":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Research in Cardiovascular Medicine","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/rcm.rcm_50_21","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

Background: Mitral valve replacement procedure has increased in the Iran over the last years. For optimization of the results, as the other procedure, it needs statistical evaluation of the results, and then a system for the prediction of outcome. Hence, in this study, we generate a machine learning (ML)-based model to predict in-hospital mortality after isolated mitral valve replacement (IMVR). Materials and Methods: The patients who underwent IMVR from February 2005 to August 2016 were identified in a single tertiary heart hospital. Data were retrospectively gathered including baseline characteristics, echocardiographic and surgical features, and patient's outcome. Prediction models for in-hospital mortality were obtained using five supervised ML classifiers including: logistic regression (LR), linear discriminant analysis (LDA), support-vector machine (SVM), K-nearest neighbors (KNN), and multilayer perceptron (MLP). Results: A total of 1200 IMVRs were analyzed in our study. The study population was randomly divided into a training set (n = 840) and a testing set (n = 360). The overall in-hospital mortality was 4.2%. LR model had the best discrimination for 22 variables in predicting mortality after IMVR, with area under the receiver-operating curve (AUC), specificity, and sensitivity of 0.68, 0.73, and 0.58, respectively. A LDA model had an (AUC) of 0.73, compared to 0.56 for SVM, 0.51 for KNN, and 0.5 for MLP. Conclusions: We developed a robust ML-derived model to predict in-hospital mortality in patients undergoing IMVR. This model is promising for decision-making and deserves further clinical validation.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
二尖瓣置换术的机器学习死亡率预测
背景:在过去的几年中,伊朗的二尖瓣置换术有所增加。对于结果的优化,与另一个过程一样,需要对结果进行统计评价,然后是结果预测系统。因此,在本研究中,我们生成了一个基于机器学习(ML)的模型来预测孤立二尖瓣置换术(IMVR)后的住院死亡率。材料与方法:选取2005年2月至2016年8月在某三级心脏医院行IMVR的患者。回顾性收集资料,包括基线特征、超声心动图和手术特征以及患者预后。采用logistic回归(LR)、线性判别分析(LDA)、支持向量机(SVM)、k近邻(KNN)和多层感知器(MLP)等5种监督式机器学习分类器建立住院死亡率预测模型。结果:本研究共分析了1200例IMVRs。研究人群被随机分为训练集(n = 840)和测试集(n = 360)。住院总死亡率为4.2%。LR模型在预测IMVR术后死亡率的22个变量中具有最好的判别性,其受体-工作曲线下面积(AUC)、特异性和敏感性分别为0.68、0.73和0.58。LDA模型的AUC为0.73,而SVM模型为0.56,KNN模型为0.51,MLP模型为0.5。结论:我们开发了一个强大的ml衍生模型来预测IMVR患者的住院死亡率。该模型有希望用于决策,值得进一步的临床验证。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine
Research in Cardiovascular Medicine CARDIAC & CARDIOVASCULAR SYSTEMS-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
13
审稿时长
17 weeks
期刊最新文献
An unusual presentation of a rare case of rhabdomyosarcoma of the left atrium as severe rheumatic mitral stenosis with atrial fibrillation, fast ventricular rate, and left atrial failure Prognostic value of cardiac and noncardiac biomarkers in infective endocarditis: A prospective cross-sectional study Transcatheter closure of the aortopulmonary window with a multifunctional occluder device Predictions of adherence to treatment in patients referred to the heart failure clinic of Shahid Rajaee Hospital in Tehran The association between statin dosage and malignant ventricular arrhythmias in patients with primary prevention implantable cardioverter-defibrillators for ischemic cardiomyopathy
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1