Protection againts Creditors Rights Holders Fiduciary Guarantee Post Constitutional Court's No.18/PUU/XVII/2019

Wardani Rizkianti, Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi, M. Sakti
{"title":"Protection againts Creditors Rights Holders Fiduciary Guarantee Post Constitutional Court's No.18/PUU/XVII/2019","authors":"Wardani Rizkianti, Muhammad Helmi Fahrozi, M. Sakti","doi":"10.32801/LAMLAJ.V5I2.182","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU/XVII/2019 was issued, creditors can no longer forcibly withdraw the fiduciary guarantee without the result of the district court’s decision agreed by the creditors and debtors that a breach of promise occurred. The facts in the field are that debtors often make defaults. As a result, creditors must be more careful in executing fiduciary security. This study aims to determine what steps creditors must take to remain by legal corridors. Judges’ decisions must create justice, not only for the debtor but also for creditors’ interests. Creditor services are one of the factors. A large increase in the country’s economy, if creditors’ interests do not accommodate it, the judge’s decision is far from a sense of justice). This study also illustrates the creditor’s executorial power to the fiduciary guarantee deed. Based on normative legal studies, the researcher concludes that regulations to determine precise steps and simple mechanisms need to be established by creditors and the government as a guideline for the execution of guarantees. The executive power has the nature of justice for all parties.","PeriodicalId":31238,"journal":{"name":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","volume":"5 1","pages":"180-189"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2020-09-30","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Lambung Mangkurat Law Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.32801/LAMLAJ.V5I2.182","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

After the Constitutional Court Decision No. 18/PUU/XVII/2019 was issued, creditors can no longer forcibly withdraw the fiduciary guarantee without the result of the district court’s decision agreed by the creditors and debtors that a breach of promise occurred. The facts in the field are that debtors often make defaults. As a result, creditors must be more careful in executing fiduciary security. This study aims to determine what steps creditors must take to remain by legal corridors. Judges’ decisions must create justice, not only for the debtor but also for creditors’ interests. Creditor services are one of the factors. A large increase in the country’s economy, if creditors’ interests do not accommodate it, the judge’s decision is far from a sense of justice). This study also illustrates the creditor’s executorial power to the fiduciary guarantee deed. Based on normative legal studies, the researcher concludes that regulations to determine precise steps and simple mechanisms need to be established by creditors and the government as a guideline for the execution of guarantees. The executive power has the nature of justice for all parties.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
宪法法院第18/PUU/XVII/2019号决议后对债权人、权利持有人的保护
在宪法法院第18/PUU/XVII/2019号裁决发布后,如果没有债权人和债务人同意的地区法院关于发生违约的裁决结果,债权人就不能再强制撤回信托担保。该领域的事实是,债务人经常违约。因此,债权人在执行信托担保时必须更加谨慎。本研究旨在确定债权人必须采取哪些步骤才能遵守法律走廊。法官的裁决必须创造正义,不仅是为了债务人,也是为了债权人的利益。债权人服务是其中一个因素。该国经济的大幅增长,如果债权人的利益不能适应,法官的决定就远非正义感)。本研究还阐释了债权人对信托担保契约的执行权。基于规范性法律研究,研究人员得出结论,债权人和政府需要制定确定确切步骤和简单机制的法规,作为执行担保的指导方针。行政权力具有为各方伸张正义的性质。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
17
审稿时长
3 weeks
期刊最新文献
Law Enforcement Against Perpetrators of the Crime of Burning Peatlands in Banjar Regency Company Loans in Procurement of Goods Services Government Corruption Perspectives Forced Marriage as an Unlawful Act in Indonesia: A Comparative Analysis Legal Protection of Peer to Peer Lending Loans in Standard Agreements Based on Legal Assurance Theory Implementation of Sustainable Plantation Principles Through Indonesian Sustainable Palm Oil in North Aceh Regency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1