Changes in extreme daily precipitation over Africa: Insights from a non-asymptotic statistical approach

IF 3.1 Q2 GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Journal of Hydrology X Pub Date : 2022-08-01 DOI:10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100130
Francesco Marra, Vincenzo Levizzani, Elsa Cattani
{"title":"Changes in extreme daily precipitation over Africa: Insights from a non-asymptotic statistical approach","authors":"Francesco Marra,&nbsp;Vincenzo Levizzani,&nbsp;Elsa Cattani","doi":"10.1016/j.hydroa.2022.100130","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"<div><p>Extreme precipitation heavily affects society and economy in Africa because it triggers natural hazards and contributes large amounts of freshwater. Understanding past changes in extreme precipitation could help us improve our projections of extremes, thus reducing the vulnerability of the region to climate change. Here, we combine high-resolution satellite data (1981–2019) with a novel non-asymptotic statistical approach, which explicitly separates intensity and occurrence of the process. We investigate past changes in extreme daily precipitation amounts relevant to engineering and risk management. Significant (<span><math><mrow><mi>α</mi><mo>=</mo><mn>0.05</mn></mrow></math></span>) positive and negative trends in annual maximum daily precipitation are reported in ∼20 % of Africa both at the local scales (0.05°) and mesoscales (1°). Our statistical model is able to explain ∼90% of their variance, and performs well (72% explained variance) even when annual maxima are explicitly censored from the parameter estimation. This suggests possible applications in situations in which the observed extremes are not quantitatively trusted. We present results at the continental scale, as well as for six areas characterized by different climatic characteristics and forcing mechanisms underlying the ongoing changes. In general, we can attribute most of the observed trends to changes in the tail heaviness of the intensity distribution (25% of explained variance, 38% at the mesoscale), while changes in the average number of wet days only explain 4% (12%) of the variance. Low-probability extremes always exhibit faster trend rates than annual maxima (∼44% faster, in median, for the case of 100-year events), implying that changes in infrastructure design values are likely underestimated by approaches based on trend analyses of annual maxima: flexible change-permitting models are needed. No systematic difference between local and mesoscales is reported, with locally-varying impacts on the areal reduction factors used to transform return levels across scales.</p></div>","PeriodicalId":36948,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Hydrology X","volume":"16 ","pages":"Article 100130"},"PeriodicalIF":3.1000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000128/pdfft?md5=caefd15fa09576882d34159975a4ef7a&pid=1-s2.0-S2589915522000128-main.pdf","citationCount":"11","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Hydrology X","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2589915522000128","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"GEOSCIENCES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 11

Abstract

Extreme precipitation heavily affects society and economy in Africa because it triggers natural hazards and contributes large amounts of freshwater. Understanding past changes in extreme precipitation could help us improve our projections of extremes, thus reducing the vulnerability of the region to climate change. Here, we combine high-resolution satellite data (1981–2019) with a novel non-asymptotic statistical approach, which explicitly separates intensity and occurrence of the process. We investigate past changes in extreme daily precipitation amounts relevant to engineering and risk management. Significant (α=0.05) positive and negative trends in annual maximum daily precipitation are reported in ∼20 % of Africa both at the local scales (0.05°) and mesoscales (1°). Our statistical model is able to explain ∼90% of their variance, and performs well (72% explained variance) even when annual maxima are explicitly censored from the parameter estimation. This suggests possible applications in situations in which the observed extremes are not quantitatively trusted. We present results at the continental scale, as well as for six areas characterized by different climatic characteristics and forcing mechanisms underlying the ongoing changes. In general, we can attribute most of the observed trends to changes in the tail heaviness of the intensity distribution (25% of explained variance, 38% at the mesoscale), while changes in the average number of wet days only explain 4% (12%) of the variance. Low-probability extremes always exhibit faster trend rates than annual maxima (∼44% faster, in median, for the case of 100-year events), implying that changes in infrastructure design values are likely underestimated by approaches based on trend analyses of annual maxima: flexible change-permitting models are needed. No systematic difference between local and mesoscales is reported, with locally-varying impacts on the areal reduction factors used to transform return levels across scales.

查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
非洲极端日降水的变化:来自非渐近统计方法的见解
极端降水严重影响非洲的社会和经济,因为它引发自然灾害并提供大量淡水。了解过去极端降水的变化可以帮助我们改进对极端事件的预测,从而减少该地区对气候变化的脆弱性。在这里,我们将高分辨率卫星数据(1981-2019)与一种新的非渐近统计方法相结合,该方法明确分离了该过程的强度和发生。我们研究了与工程和风险管理相关的极端日降水量的过去变化。在非洲约20%的地区,在局地尺度(0.05°)和中尺度(1°)上,年最大日降水量都有显著的(α=0.05)正趋势和负趋势。我们的统计模型能够解释~ 90%的方差,并且即使从参数估计中明确删除了年最大值,也表现良好(72%的解释方差)。这表明在观测到的极值在数量上不可信的情况下可能的应用。我们提出了大陆尺度的结果,以及六个以不同气候特征和持续变化的强迫机制为特征的地区的结果。总的来说,我们可以将观测到的大部分趋势归因于强度分布尾部重的变化(占解释方差的25%,在中尺度上占38%),而平均湿日数的变化只能解释4%(12%)的方差。低概率极端事件的趋势率总是比年最大值快(在100年事件的情况下,中位数快约44%),这意味着基于年最大值趋势分析的方法可能低估了基础设施设计值的变化:需要灵活的允许变化的模型。据报道,局尺度和中尺度之间没有系统差异,对用于转换不同尺度的回归水平的面积减少因子的影响存在局地差异。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Hydrology X
Journal of Hydrology X Environmental Science-Water Science and Technology
CiteScore
7.00
自引率
2.50%
发文量
20
审稿时长
25 weeks
期刊最新文献
Revisiting model complexity: Space-time correction of high dimensional variable sets in climate model simulations Quantifying the economic value of a national hydrometric network for households Private sensors and crowdsourced rainfall data: Accuracy and potential for modelling pluvial flooding in urban areas of Oslo, Norway A combined data assimilation and deep learning approach for continuous spatio-temporal SWE reconstruction from sparse ground tracks A nonstationary stochastic simulator for clustered regional hydroclimatic extremes to Characterize compound flood risk
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1