Assessing the State of Sociological Theory in Music Education: Uncovering the Epistemic Unconscious

S. Karlsen
{"title":"Assessing the State of Sociological Theory in Music Education: Uncovering the Epistemic Unconscious","authors":"S. Karlsen","doi":"10.2979/philmusieducrevi.29.2.02","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The aim of this article is to analyze and discuss the role that sociological theory plays in music education scholarship. Using books published internationally and explicitly on the topic of the sociology of music education during the recent decade as well as abstracts published in the programs from the 2017 and 2019 International Symposium on the Sociology of Music Education biennial conferences as entryways into this discussion, the questions asked are: What kinds of sociological theory are put to use in this material? Which sociologists or sociological theoreticians seem to be the main contributors in this regard? Which questions are asked by utilizing the approaches in play? In other words, what is sociological theory used for? In order to create a backdrop for the analysis, the article provides brief overviews of some of the similarities and differences between the field of philosophy and that of sociology in general as well as the state of sociological theory within music sociology and cultural sociology. Compared with the latter two scholarly fields, that of music education sociology comes through as one in considerable lack of theory creation, and as more invested in the logic of practice than subscribing to the rules of the scholastic game. It is also predominantly Western-centric. Following Bourdieu, these features are interpreted as conveying some of music education’s “epistemic unconscious.”","PeriodicalId":43479,"journal":{"name":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","volume":"29 1","pages":"136 - 154"},"PeriodicalIF":0.7000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Philosophy of Music Education Review","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.2979/philmusieducrevi.29.2.02","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Abstract:The aim of this article is to analyze and discuss the role that sociological theory plays in music education scholarship. Using books published internationally and explicitly on the topic of the sociology of music education during the recent decade as well as abstracts published in the programs from the 2017 and 2019 International Symposium on the Sociology of Music Education biennial conferences as entryways into this discussion, the questions asked are: What kinds of sociological theory are put to use in this material? Which sociologists or sociological theoreticians seem to be the main contributors in this regard? Which questions are asked by utilizing the approaches in play? In other words, what is sociological theory used for? In order to create a backdrop for the analysis, the article provides brief overviews of some of the similarities and differences between the field of philosophy and that of sociology in general as well as the state of sociological theory within music sociology and cultural sociology. Compared with the latter two scholarly fields, that of music education sociology comes through as one in considerable lack of theory creation, and as more invested in the logic of practice than subscribing to the rules of the scholastic game. It is also predominantly Western-centric. Following Bourdieu, these features are interpreted as conveying some of music education’s “epistemic unconscious.”
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
评价音乐教育中的社会学理论现状:揭示认知无意识
摘要:本文旨在分析和探讨社会学理论在音乐教育学术研究中的作用。使用近十年来国际上出版的明确关于音乐教育社会学主题的书籍,以及2017年和2019年音乐教育社会学国际研讨会两年一次的会议中发表的摘要作为讨论的入口,所提出的问题是:在这些材料中使用了什么样的社会学理论?哪些社会学家或社会学理论家似乎是这方面的主要贡献者?在游戏中使用这些方法会提出哪些问题?换句话说,社会学理论的用途是什么?为了给分析创造一个背景,本文简要概述了哲学领域与一般社会学领域的一些异同,以及音乐社会学和文化社会学中社会学理论的现状。与后两个学术领域相比,音乐教育社会学的理论创造相当缺乏,并且更多地投入于实践逻辑而不是服从学术游戏规则。它也是以西方为中心的。按照布迪厄的观点,这些特征被解释为传达了一些音乐教育的“认知无意识”。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
0
期刊最新文献
Opening Up to the Unexpected: Reclaiming Emotion and Power in the Public Space of Music Education 中国音乐教育与国际音乐教育 [Chinese Music Education and International Music Education] by Jianhua Guan (review) Music for All or Partisan Advocacy? Exploring Socialized Epistemologies Musik–Vielfalt–Integration–Inklusion: Musikdidaktik für die eine Schule [Music–Diversity–Inclusion–Integration: A New Philosophy of Music Education for an Inclusive School] by Irmgard Merkt (review) Editorial Reflections on Philosophizing in Music Education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1