Analyzing the Evolution of China-Africa Economic Integration: A Wavelet Approach

IF 1.2 Q3 ECONOMICS Journal of Economic Integration Pub Date : 2023-06-15 DOI:10.11130/jei.2023.38.2.302
Marvellous Ngundu, H. Ngalawa
{"title":"Analyzing the Evolution of China-Africa Economic Integration: A Wavelet Approach","authors":"Marvellous Ngundu, H. Ngalawa","doi":"10.11130/jei.2023.38.2.302","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This study analyzes the evolution of Africa's degree of economic integration with China from 1993 to 2019. The study period encompasses a number of China-Africa bilateral economic treaties, which the literature claims are prolific and have significantly strengthened Africa's degree of economic integration with China. We develop a theoretical argument that, if this assertion holds, the integration indicator must reflect a long-run upward trend that is less obstructed by noise. To validate this argument, we use a wavelet approach and find no evidence necessitating failure to reject the null hypothesis of no periodicity, suggesting that the integration indicator was statistically noisy over the study period. This finding suggests that interpreting the evolution of China-Africa economic integration primarily through bilateral economic pacts can be deceptive. The interpretation should instead be exploratory in nature to unpack some hidden motivations associated with this integration. Our preliminary investigation revealed that the Angola Model is primarily driving China-Africa economic integration. Therefore, it is plausible to argue that China-Africa economic integration is perpetuated to exploit natural resources rather than to enhance hard infrastructure development in Africa, as purported in the literature.","PeriodicalId":45678,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Economic Integration","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-06-15","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Economic Integration","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.11130/jei.2023.38.2.302","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ECONOMICS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

This study analyzes the evolution of Africa's degree of economic integration with China from 1993 to 2019. The study period encompasses a number of China-Africa bilateral economic treaties, which the literature claims are prolific and have significantly strengthened Africa's degree of economic integration with China. We develop a theoretical argument that, if this assertion holds, the integration indicator must reflect a long-run upward trend that is less obstructed by noise. To validate this argument, we use a wavelet approach and find no evidence necessitating failure to reject the null hypothesis of no periodicity, suggesting that the integration indicator was statistically noisy over the study period. This finding suggests that interpreting the evolution of China-Africa economic integration primarily through bilateral economic pacts can be deceptive. The interpretation should instead be exploratory in nature to unpack some hidden motivations associated with this integration. Our preliminary investigation revealed that the Angola Model is primarily driving China-Africa economic integration. Therefore, it is plausible to argue that China-Africa economic integration is perpetuated to exploit natural resources rather than to enhance hard infrastructure development in Africa, as purported in the literature.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
中非经济一体化演进的小波分析
本研究分析了1993年至2019年非洲与中国经济一体化程度的演变。本研究涵盖了许多中非双边经济条约,文献称这些条约内容丰富,显著加强了非洲与中国的经济一体化程度。我们提出了一个理论论点,即如果这一断言成立,那么综合指标必须反映出一个不那么受噪音阻碍的长期上升趋势。为了验证这一论点,我们使用了小波方法,没有发现任何证据表明不能拒绝无周期性的零假设,这表明积分指标在研究期间在统计上是有噪声的。这一发现表明,主要通过双边经济协定来解释中非经济一体化的演变可能具有欺骗性。相反,这种解释应该是探索性的,以解开与这种整合相关的一些隐藏的动机。我们的初步调查显示,安哥拉模式主要推动中非经济一体化。因此,有理由认为,中非经济一体化是为了开发自然资源,而不是像文献中所说的那样,加强非洲的硬基础设施发展。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
期刊最新文献
The Empirical Study on Producer Service Industry and Economic Growth in China: Implication on Economic Integration External Debt and Economic Vulnerability: An International Evidence Examining the Impact of Environmental Pollution and Life Expectancy on Economic Growth in the European Union Trade Liberalization, International Relocation of Firms, and Economic Growth Assessing the Association Between Trade and Regional Trade Agreements: A Network Approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1