Investigation of the Frequency of Adverse Effects in Patients Treated with Favipiravir as SARS-CoV-2 Treatment

IF 0.3 Q3 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Klimik Journal Pub Date : 2021-07-08 DOI:10.36519/KD.2021.3563
Ebru Dogan, Sevil Alkan-Çeviker, Servan Vurucu, A. Şener, Buse Yüksel, Uğur Gönlügür, T. Şimşek, Mehmet Hakan Ulusoy
{"title":"Investigation of the Frequency of Adverse Effects in Patients Treated with Favipiravir as SARS-CoV-2 Treatment","authors":"Ebru Dogan, Sevil Alkan-Çeviker, Servan Vurucu, A. Şener, Buse Yüksel, Uğur Gönlügür, T. Şimşek, Mehmet Hakan Ulusoy","doi":"10.36519/KD.2021.3563","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: For 2019 and 2020, SARS-CoV-2 has been a sensational virus. Unfortunately, a treatment agent specific for SARS-CoV-2 has not been developed yet. Favipiravir is one of the antiviral agents used experimentally in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to determine the frequency of side effects seen in patients hospitalized in our hospital and received favipiravir at any stage of their treatment.\n\nMethods: Our study is a retrospective observational study. Definite and probable COVID-19 cases hospitalized in our hospital between March 23, 2020, May 31, 2020, were determined, and those receiving favipiravir as initial or secondary therapy were included in the study. The demographic data, laboratory tests, observed side effects of the patients were recorded and analyzed statistically.\n\nResults: A total of 134 patients, 37.3% using favipiravir at the beginning and 62.7% as secondary, were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 66.8±15.7 years. 38.1% (n=51) of the group were female. Side effects were detected in 17 (13%) patients in the whole group. Hepatotoxicity (4.5%), increased serum uric acid (4.5%), nephrotoxicity (1.5%), gastrointestinal side effects (1.5%), cardiac side effects (0.7%) were detected. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of adverse events between the patients who received favipiravir initially or later on disease course.\n\nConclusions: Although some results support the short-term safety of favipiravir, more studies are needed for its long-term effects. Studies on hyperuricemia, QTc prolongation, use in pregnancy, use during lactation and use in children are insufficient. Therefore, although Favipiravir appears to be a good alternative in the treatment of COVID-19, it should be used carefully because the data on its safety is still insufficient.\n\nKey Words: Favipiravir, adverse effects, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2","PeriodicalId":44309,"journal":{"name":"Klimik Journal","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.3000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Klimik Journal","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.36519/KD.2021.3563","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

Objective: For 2019 and 2020, SARS-CoV-2 has been a sensational virus. Unfortunately, a treatment agent specific for SARS-CoV-2 has not been developed yet. Favipiravir is one of the antiviral agents used experimentally in the treatment of SARS-CoV-2. This study aimed to determine the frequency of side effects seen in patients hospitalized in our hospital and received favipiravir at any stage of their treatment. Methods: Our study is a retrospective observational study. Definite and probable COVID-19 cases hospitalized in our hospital between March 23, 2020, May 31, 2020, were determined, and those receiving favipiravir as initial or secondary therapy were included in the study. The demographic data, laboratory tests, observed side effects of the patients were recorded and analyzed statistically. Results: A total of 134 patients, 37.3% using favipiravir at the beginning and 62.7% as secondary, were included in the study. The mean age of the patients was 66.8±15.7 years. 38.1% (n=51) of the group were female. Side effects were detected in 17 (13%) patients in the whole group. Hepatotoxicity (4.5%), increased serum uric acid (4.5%), nephrotoxicity (1.5%), gastrointestinal side effects (1.5%), cardiac side effects (0.7%) were detected. There was no statistically significant difference in terms of adverse events between the patients who received favipiravir initially or later on disease course. Conclusions: Although some results support the short-term safety of favipiravir, more studies are needed for its long-term effects. Studies on hyperuricemia, QTc prolongation, use in pregnancy, use during lactation and use in children are insufficient. Therefore, although Favipiravir appears to be a good alternative in the treatment of COVID-19, it should be used carefully because the data on its safety is still insufficient. Key Words: Favipiravir, adverse effects, COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
Favipiravir治疗SARS-CoV-2患者不良反应频次的调查
目的:2019年和2020年,SARS-CoV-2是一种引起轰动的病毒。不幸的是,目前还没有开发出针对SARS-CoV-2的治疗剂。法匹拉韦是实验性用于治疗SARS-CoV-2的抗病毒药物之一。本研究旨在确定在我院住院并在治疗的任何阶段接受法匹拉韦治疗的患者出现副作用的频率。方法:本研究为回顾性观察研究。确定2020年3月23日至2020年5月31日期间在我院住院的确诊和疑似COVID-19病例,并将接受法匹拉韦初始或二次治疗的患者纳入研究。对患者的人口学资料、实验室检查、观察到的副作用进行记录和统计分析。结果:共有134例患者纳入研究,其中37.3%的患者开始使用favipiravir, 62.7%的患者继发使用favipiravir。患者平均年龄66.8±15.7岁。女性占38.1% (n=51)。全组17例(13%)患者出现不良反应。肝毒性(4.5%)、血清尿酸升高(4.5%)、肾毒性(1.5%)、胃肠道副作用(1.5%)、心脏副作用(0.7%)。在不良事件方面,在最初接受法匹拉韦治疗或在病程后期接受法匹拉韦治疗的患者之间没有统计学上的显著差异。结论:虽然一些结果支持favipiravir的短期安全性,但其长期效果还需要更多的研究。关于高尿酸血症、QTc延长、孕期使用、哺乳期使用和儿童使用的研究不足。因此,尽管Favipiravir似乎是治疗COVID-19的良好选择,但应谨慎使用,因为关于其安全性的数据仍然不足。关键词:法匹拉韦,不良反应,COVID-19, SARS-CoV-2
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Klimik Journal
Klimik Journal MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.60
自引率
33.30%
发文量
39
期刊最新文献
Fourth-year Results of HBeAg Negative Chronic Hepatitis B Patients Discontinuing Nucleos(t)ide Analogue Therapy Trimethoprim-Sulfamethoxazole and Ciprofloxacin Resistance Rates in Escherichia coli and Klebsiella spp. in Urinary Tract Infections: A 10-Year Evaluation The Incidence and Factors Affecting the 28-day Hospital Admission Among Adult Ambulatory COVID-19 Patients Correlation of Real-Time PCR Cycle Threshold Values and Clinical Progress, Mortality, and Laboratory Parameters of COVID-19 Patients Evaluation of Risk Factors Causing Nosocomial Acinetobacter Bacteremia and Mortality in the Intensive Care Unit
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1