Improving interdisciplinary online course design through action learning: a chinese case study

IF 1.1 Q3 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Action Learning Pub Date : 2021-11-10 DOI:10.1080/14767333.2021.2002681
Na Li, Qian Wang, Jiajun Liu, V. Marsick
{"title":"Improving interdisciplinary online course design through action learning: a chinese case study","authors":"Na Li, Qian Wang, Jiajun Liu, V. Marsick","doi":"10.1080/14767333.2021.2002681","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This case study draws a specific link to the practice of action learning (AL) in China. We organized ourselves into an AL set and used Revans’ AL, as interpreted by Marquardt (2004), to create a post-teaching dialog to examine the experience gained from delivering an interdisciplinary course online—a novice situation—in a Chinese transnational university. AL’s questioning insight occurred after conducting an evidence-based evaluation of online teaching in an interdisciplinary higher education course that used Debattista’s (2018) online teaching effectiveness rubric. The rubric offered rich ‘programed knowledge’ that triggered our question-based inquiry. We conclude that our AL approach is valuable for teacher professional development and offers our rationale for why this particular AL practice would be suitable for the Confucian culture, teaching of interdisciplinary courses, and in novice situations. By conducting AL, we identified a list of key findings, such as proactive communication among teachers in an interdisciplinary course, was vital when teaching to a large group of students. We offer recommendations to improve interdisciplinary online course design and delivery in the future based on reflections from the AL. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are presented at the end of this paper.","PeriodicalId":44898,"journal":{"name":"Action Learning","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2021-11-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"9","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Action Learning","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14767333.2021.2002681","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 9

Abstract

ABSTRACT This case study draws a specific link to the practice of action learning (AL) in China. We organized ourselves into an AL set and used Revans’ AL, as interpreted by Marquardt (2004), to create a post-teaching dialog to examine the experience gained from delivering an interdisciplinary course online—a novice situation—in a Chinese transnational university. AL’s questioning insight occurred after conducting an evidence-based evaluation of online teaching in an interdisciplinary higher education course that used Debattista’s (2018) online teaching effectiveness rubric. The rubric offered rich ‘programed knowledge’ that triggered our question-based inquiry. We conclude that our AL approach is valuable for teacher professional development and offers our rationale for why this particular AL practice would be suitable for the Confucian culture, teaching of interdisciplinary courses, and in novice situations. By conducting AL, we identified a list of key findings, such as proactive communication among teachers in an interdisciplinary course, was vital when teaching to a large group of students. We offer recommendations to improve interdisciplinary online course design and delivery in the future based on reflections from the AL. Implications, limitations, and suggestions for future research are presented at the end of this paper.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过行动学习改进跨学科网络课程设计:一个中国案例研究
摘要本案例研究将行动学习与中国的实践联系起来。我们将自己组织成一个AL集合,并使用Revans的AL,正如Marquardt(2004)所解释的那样,创建了一个教学后对话,以检查在中国跨国大学在线提供跨学科课程(新手情况)所获得的经验。AL的质疑见解发生在对一门跨学科高等教育课程的在线教学进行循证评估后,该课程使用了Debattista(2018)的在线教学有效性准则。该准则提供了丰富的“程序化知识”,引发了我们基于问题的调查。我们得出的结论是,我们的AL方法对教师专业发展很有价值,并为为什么这种特殊的AL实践适合儒家文化、跨学科课程的教学以及新手情况提供了理由。通过进行AL,我们确定了一系列关键发现,例如跨学科课程中教师之间的积极沟通,在向一大群学生授课时至关重要。基于AL的反思,我们提出了改进跨学科在线课程设计和交付的建议。本文最后提出了对未来研究的启示、局限性和建议。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Action Learning
Action Learning EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
40.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Critical incident technique and action learning to enable organizational learning How to facilitate critical action learning How to promote inclusion, collective intelligence and democracy Action learning aiding innovation In memoriam – Professor John Burgoyne
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1