Democracy, free association and boundary delimitation: The cases of Catalonia and Tabarnia

IF 1.1 Q3 POLITICAL SCIENCE Journal of International Political Theory Pub Date : 2020-10-01 DOI:10.1177/1755088219848460
Guillermo Graíño Ferrer, Adriaan Ph V Kühn
{"title":"Democracy, free association and boundary delimitation: The cases of Catalonia and Tabarnia","authors":"Guillermo Graíño Ferrer, Adriaan Ph V Kühn","doi":"10.1177/1755088219848460","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This article aims to illustrate the confusion within today’s secessionist movements regarding the liberal and the nationalist arguments for legitimising secession. To do so, the liberal theory of secession – understood as an approach primarily based on consent – is examined, its limitations highlighted and its contradictions with nationalism stated. We then use the case of the fictional Tabarnia region to show how problematic the use of liberal arguments by secessionist nationalism is. Although until now only a virtual region, Tabarnia exemplifies how nationalist arguments reappear in the defence of Catalan independence when its supporters claim to only propose arguments of free association.","PeriodicalId":44237,"journal":{"name":"Journal of International Political Theory","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":1.1000,"publicationDate":"2020-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1177/1755088219848460","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of International Political Theory","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1177/1755088219848460","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"POLITICAL SCIENCE","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

This article aims to illustrate the confusion within today’s secessionist movements regarding the liberal and the nationalist arguments for legitimising secession. To do so, the liberal theory of secession – understood as an approach primarily based on consent – is examined, its limitations highlighted and its contradictions with nationalism stated. We then use the case of the fictional Tabarnia region to show how problematic the use of liberal arguments by secessionist nationalism is. Although until now only a virtual region, Tabarnia exemplifies how nationalist arguments reappear in the defence of Catalan independence when its supporters claim to only propose arguments of free association.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
民主、自由联合和边界划定:加泰罗尼亚和塔巴尔尼亚的案例
本文旨在说明当今分离主义运动中关于将分离合法化的自由主义和民族主义论点的混乱。为了做到这一点,我们对自由主义的分离理论——被理解为一种主要基于同意的方法——进行了研究,强调了它的局限性,并说明了它与民族主义的矛盾。然后,我们用虚构的塔巴尼亚地区的例子来说明,分离主义民族主义使用自由主义论点是多么有问题。尽管到目前为止只是一个虚拟的地区,但当塔巴尼的支持者声称只提出自由联合的论点时,民族主义的论点如何再次出现在捍卫加泰罗尼亚独立的过程中。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
10.00%
发文量
11
期刊最新文献
The global dimension of domestic regulatory agencies: Why do we need a networked perspective of political legitimacy? Arguing and bargaining in international forums: The need for a novel approach The peace/violence nexus: Fundamental, multiple, contingent Dialectical Insights for Global IR: Forum on Snapshots from Home Buddhism, quantum theory and international relations: On the strength of the subject, the discontinuous relationality, and the world of contingency
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1