Automatic vs Manual Control Strategy for Window Blinds and Ceiling Lights: Consequences to Perceived Visual and Thermal Discomfort

Q2 Energy Journal of Daylighting Pub Date : 2019-11-19 DOI:10.15627/jd.2019.11
N. Lolli, A. Nocente, J. Brozovsky, R. Woods, S. Grynning
{"title":"Automatic vs Manual Control Strategy for Window Blinds and Ceiling Lights: Consequences to Perceived Visual and Thermal Discomfort","authors":"N. Lolli, A. Nocente, J. Brozovsky, R. Woods, S. Grynning","doi":"10.15627/jd.2019.11","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"A case study to evaluate the occupants' satisfaction in relation to two different control strategies (fully automatic and manual) for blind and ceiling lights use in cell offices was carried on in Trondheim, Norway. A group of 11 participants with varying age, gender, and ethnicity, used two test cells of a laboratory as a workspace primarily carrying out office tasks at a personal computer for a total of 19 calendar days. The participants were asked to answer a computer-based questionnaire for reporting their perceived thermal and visual comfort. Concurrently, measurements of the indoor operative temperature, illuminance level, and operation of windows, blinds, and ceiling lights were registered. Results shows that the use of the automatic control strategy led to a higher visual discomfort, which in addition led to a higher thermal discomfort, despite this last not caused by a higher average operative temperature. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by solarlits.com. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).","PeriodicalId":37388,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Daylighting","volume":"6 1","pages":"112-123"},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-11-19","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"7","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Daylighting","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15627/jd.2019.11","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Energy","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 7

Abstract

A case study to evaluate the occupants' satisfaction in relation to two different control strategies (fully automatic and manual) for blind and ceiling lights use in cell offices was carried on in Trondheim, Norway. A group of 11 participants with varying age, gender, and ethnicity, used two test cells of a laboratory as a workspace primarily carrying out office tasks at a personal computer for a total of 19 calendar days. The participants were asked to answer a computer-based questionnaire for reporting their perceived thermal and visual comfort. Concurrently, measurements of the indoor operative temperature, illuminance level, and operation of windows, blinds, and ceiling lights were registered. Results shows that the use of the automatic control strategy led to a higher visual discomfort, which in addition led to a higher thermal discomfort, despite this last not caused by a higher average operative temperature. © 2019 The Author(s). Published by solarlits.com. This is an open access article under the CC BY license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/).
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
百叶窗和吸顶灯的自动与手动控制策略:视觉和热不适的后果
在挪威特隆赫姆进行了一项案例研究,以评估居住者对两种不同控制策略(全自动和手动)的满意度,这两种控制策略用于牢房办公室的百叶窗和顶灯。一个由11名不同年龄、性别和种族的参与者组成的小组,使用实验室的两个测试单元作为工作空间,主要在个人电脑上执行办公室任务,总共19个日历日。参与者被要求回答一份基于计算机的问卷,以报告他们感知到的热舒适度和视觉舒适度。同时,对室内操作温度、照度水平以及窗户、百叶窗和顶灯的操作进行了测量。结果表明,自动控制策略的使用导致了更高的视觉不适,这也导致了更大的热不适,尽管这最后不是由更高的平均手术温度引起的。©2019作者。由solarlists.com发布。这是一篇基于CC by许可证的开放访问文章(http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/)。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Journal of Daylighting
Journal of Daylighting Energy-Renewable Energy, Sustainability and the Environment
CiteScore
4.00
自引率
0.00%
发文量
18
审稿时长
10 weeks
期刊介绍: Journal of Daylighting is an international journal devoted to investigations of daylighting in buildings. It is the leading journal that publishes original research on all aspects of solar energy and lighting. Areas of special interest for this journal include, but are not limited to, the following: -Daylighting systems -Lighting simulation -Lighting designs -Luminaires -Lighting metrology and light quality -Lighting control -Building physics - lighting -Building energy modeling -Energy efficient buildings -Zero-energy buildings -Indoor environment quality -Sustainable solar energy systems -Application of solar energy sources in buildings -Photovoltaics systems -Building-integrated photovoltaics -Concentrator technology -Concentrator photovoltaic -Solar thermal
期刊最新文献
Synergistic Strategies: Comparing Energy Performance in Climate-Adaptive Building Envelopes for Iran's Cold Semi-Arid Climate Exploring Methodological Considerations: A Literature Review on How Lighting Affects the Sleep and Cognition in Healthy Older Adults Enhancing Visual Comfort and Energy Efficiency in Office Lighting Using Parametric-Generative Design Approach for Interactive Kinetic Louvers Electrochromic Glazing and Evaluation of Visual and Non-Visual Effects of Daylight: Simulation Studies for Brasilia – Brazil Analysing the Daylighting Performance of the Main Prayer-hall in the Great Mosque of Hama, Syria
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1