POLITICAL POLARIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON MENTAL HEALTH: WHERE DO WE STAND?

IF 0.2 Q4 MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ Pub Date : 2022-03-31 DOI:10.35845/kmuj.2022.22777
A. Yousafzai
{"title":"POLITICAL POLARIZATION AND ITS IMPACT ON MENTAL HEALTH: WHERE DO WE STAND?","authors":"A. Yousafzai","doi":"10.35845/kmuj.2022.22777","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Political and social polarization is the division of people in to distinct groups with contrasting viewpoints and minimum likelihood to converge on a uniform agenda. It has varied connotations in the field of social science. However, the given political climate of polarization and its impact on mental health, it is imperative to focus the issue in a scientific way. Furthermore, in recent years the situation has been made more volatile and complicated by social media amplifications with greater effects on psychosocial well-being of people. There is plenty of literature, suggesting that polarization is widely perceived as a loss or gain of social status, which has a direct link with psychological disorders.1 \nThere is scarcity of research in developing world about the psychosocial effects of polarization. Most of the research looking at the psychological adverse implications of this phenomenon has been carried out in the west. For example, a study conducted by Smith KB, reported that adverse effects of recent American polarization in politics and contrasting political views on psychosocial well-being were not less than a public health concern, leading to damaged friendships, persistent fatigue and even suicidal behavior in significant number of population.2   \nSimilarly, the stress associated with political disagreements has the add-on effect on psychosocial well-being of people holding diverse political views leading to deleterious effect on mental and physical health. The harming effects of political polarization is a known perpetuating stressor, cluttering society and traversing daily life through media, various internet platforms and persisting news feed.3 Additionally, the American Psychological Association identified politics as a major source of stress for American adults.4 \nThe findings of a recently conducted survey showed that nearly 40% Americans reported that they were stressed out because of politics and nearly 20% had lost sleep due to the effects of social upheaval and almost same number were tired of political news.5 In addition to psychological consequences political stress, French JA et al, reported increased blood cortisol, increased skin conductance and decreased testosterone levels in people engaging in emotionally draining political debates.6 \nIt’s equally, important to understand the mechanism through which the polarized politics harm the psychological health, and how it should be managed in order to ward off its deleterious consequences? The mechanism is well understood that people can’t isolate themselves from politics bearing in mind the vast array of information feed on daily basis. Secondly, as part of human society one can’t get away with social network and individual identity. As far the negative effects are concerned, they, permeate through various means, irrespective of people being either actively involved in politics or passive only observer. For, instance, the harassment, bullying, grandstanding attitude on social media is not uncommon while personal political debates, demeaning comments and its association with psychosocial sickness is well documented.7 \nThe cult indoctrination is another distressing phenomenon, where the leaders coerce the followers through persuasions, thoughts reformation and brainwashing leading to immense suffering of exposed population to such condition, at times along with their family, friends and community at large.8   There is large body of research pointing towards the abusive effects of cultic politics and its adverse emotional consequences. The psychological damages perpetrated by cultic indoctrination, fake and occult information have been extensively reported in scientific publications over the last many years.9   \nPakistan is a South Asian Muslim country of more than 220 million population with relatively unstable political history and abysmal socio-economic and health indicators. Mental health statistics are staggering with a wide treatment gap and no dedicated budgetary allocation of annual gross domestic product (GDP).10 \nIn addition to the existing heavy burden of mental health issues and traditional entrenched religious   intolerance in Pakistan, the recent wave of political intolerance has polarized the society to an unprecedented level. This wave of political polarization has permeated into all stratums of society, with sporadic reports of violence, which is likely to deteriorate further in the presence of unregulated and excessive use of social media. The widespread consumption of social media reports without verification of its authenticity could be one of the sources of social and political polarization which may cause further deterioration in near future.11 \nRegrettably, the young population constitute about 60% of the Pakistani population has been found to be affected more easily by the polarized environment in the country, which otherwise should be the most productive segment of society. As a matter of fact, depriving them of critical thinking and ability to formulate and ask appropriate questions tantamount to a huge social capital loss. Scientific literature shows that younger population is more impressionable and highly vulnerable to become radicalized easily in a polarized a society, unfortunately, Pakistan is not an exception, currently a fertile ground to support the growth of such tendencies.12 The recent published reports in lay press pointing to a shocking situation of violence in various part of the country due to political rivalry and contrasting posts on social media. \nThe vulnerability of people being affected psychologically by political polarization has been reported extensively by previously published research. Various reports indicate that perpetuating exposure to political stress is associated with increased rates of psychiatric disorders like anxiety, depression and even suicidal behavior.1 \nSimilarly, mental health professionals are also facing the dilemma of unfriendly environment generated around politics, which highlights the need for further training to deal with such issues without being judgmental or biased in clinical setting.13 \nIt is the right time that scientific community, social scientists, political and religious opinion makers open a dialogue to raise awareness about the possible causes and devastating effects of polarization on the society. Country like ours with entrenched religious intolerance, economical inequalities, social disparity and alarming mental health statistics can’t afford to get plunged into yet another social and psychological chaos in the background heated polarized political discourse. We need to encourage our younger generation to be more tolerant and equipped with critical thinking to meet the social challenges with grace and scientific reasoning in order to ward off the impending onslaught of polarization, radicalization and psychosocial sickness. There is dire need to bring back the lost political sanity and put a full stop to the rising psychosocial turmoil in Pakistan.","PeriodicalId":42581,"journal":{"name":"Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-03-31","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.35845/kmuj.2022.22777","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Political and social polarization is the division of people in to distinct groups with contrasting viewpoints and minimum likelihood to converge on a uniform agenda. It has varied connotations in the field of social science. However, the given political climate of polarization and its impact on mental health, it is imperative to focus the issue in a scientific way. Furthermore, in recent years the situation has been made more volatile and complicated by social media amplifications with greater effects on psychosocial well-being of people. There is plenty of literature, suggesting that polarization is widely perceived as a loss or gain of social status, which has a direct link with psychological disorders.1 There is scarcity of research in developing world about the psychosocial effects of polarization. Most of the research looking at the psychological adverse implications of this phenomenon has been carried out in the west. For example, a study conducted by Smith KB, reported that adverse effects of recent American polarization in politics and contrasting political views on psychosocial well-being were not less than a public health concern, leading to damaged friendships, persistent fatigue and even suicidal behavior in significant number of population.2   Similarly, the stress associated with political disagreements has the add-on effect on psychosocial well-being of people holding diverse political views leading to deleterious effect on mental and physical health. The harming effects of political polarization is a known perpetuating stressor, cluttering society and traversing daily life through media, various internet platforms and persisting news feed.3 Additionally, the American Psychological Association identified politics as a major source of stress for American adults.4 The findings of a recently conducted survey showed that nearly 40% Americans reported that they were stressed out because of politics and nearly 20% had lost sleep due to the effects of social upheaval and almost same number were tired of political news.5 In addition to psychological consequences political stress, French JA et al, reported increased blood cortisol, increased skin conductance and decreased testosterone levels in people engaging in emotionally draining political debates.6 It’s equally, important to understand the mechanism through which the polarized politics harm the psychological health, and how it should be managed in order to ward off its deleterious consequences? The mechanism is well understood that people can’t isolate themselves from politics bearing in mind the vast array of information feed on daily basis. Secondly, as part of human society one can’t get away with social network and individual identity. As far the negative effects are concerned, they, permeate through various means, irrespective of people being either actively involved in politics or passive only observer. For, instance, the harassment, bullying, grandstanding attitude on social media is not uncommon while personal political debates, demeaning comments and its association with psychosocial sickness is well documented.7 The cult indoctrination is another distressing phenomenon, where the leaders coerce the followers through persuasions, thoughts reformation and brainwashing leading to immense suffering of exposed population to such condition, at times along with their family, friends and community at large.8   There is large body of research pointing towards the abusive effects of cultic politics and its adverse emotional consequences. The psychological damages perpetrated by cultic indoctrination, fake and occult information have been extensively reported in scientific publications over the last many years.9   Pakistan is a South Asian Muslim country of more than 220 million population with relatively unstable political history and abysmal socio-economic and health indicators. Mental health statistics are staggering with a wide treatment gap and no dedicated budgetary allocation of annual gross domestic product (GDP).10 In addition to the existing heavy burden of mental health issues and traditional entrenched religious   intolerance in Pakistan, the recent wave of political intolerance has polarized the society to an unprecedented level. This wave of political polarization has permeated into all stratums of society, with sporadic reports of violence, which is likely to deteriorate further in the presence of unregulated and excessive use of social media. The widespread consumption of social media reports without verification of its authenticity could be one of the sources of social and political polarization which may cause further deterioration in near future.11 Regrettably, the young population constitute about 60% of the Pakistani population has been found to be affected more easily by the polarized environment in the country, which otherwise should be the most productive segment of society. As a matter of fact, depriving them of critical thinking and ability to formulate and ask appropriate questions tantamount to a huge social capital loss. Scientific literature shows that younger population is more impressionable and highly vulnerable to become radicalized easily in a polarized a society, unfortunately, Pakistan is not an exception, currently a fertile ground to support the growth of such tendencies.12 The recent published reports in lay press pointing to a shocking situation of violence in various part of the country due to political rivalry and contrasting posts on social media. The vulnerability of people being affected psychologically by political polarization has been reported extensively by previously published research. Various reports indicate that perpetuating exposure to political stress is associated with increased rates of psychiatric disorders like anxiety, depression and even suicidal behavior.1 Similarly, mental health professionals are also facing the dilemma of unfriendly environment generated around politics, which highlights the need for further training to deal with such issues without being judgmental or biased in clinical setting.13 It is the right time that scientific community, social scientists, political and religious opinion makers open a dialogue to raise awareness about the possible causes and devastating effects of polarization on the society. Country like ours with entrenched religious intolerance, economical inequalities, social disparity and alarming mental health statistics can’t afford to get plunged into yet another social and psychological chaos in the background heated polarized political discourse. We need to encourage our younger generation to be more tolerant and equipped with critical thinking to meet the social challenges with grace and scientific reasoning in order to ward off the impending onslaught of polarization, radicalization and psychosocial sickness. There is dire need to bring back the lost political sanity and put a full stop to the rising psychosocial turmoil in Pakistan.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
政治两极分化及其对心理健康的影响:我们在哪里?
政治和社会两极分化是指人们被划分为不同的群体,他们的观点截然不同,在统一议程上趋同的可能性极小。它在社会科学领域具有多种内涵。然而,鉴于两极分化的政治气候及其对心理健康的影响,必须以科学的方式关注这一问题。此外,近年来,由于社交媒体的放大,情况变得更加不稳定和复杂,对人们的社会心理健康产生了更大的影响。有大量的文献表明,两极分化被广泛认为是社会地位的损失或获得,这与心理障碍有直接的联系在发展中国家,关于两极分化的社会心理影响的研究很少。大多数关于这一现象对心理不利影响的研究都是在西方进行的。例如,Smith KB进行的一项研究报告说,最近美国政治两极分化和截然不同的政治观点对社会心理健康的不利影响不亚于一个公共健康问题,导致大量人口出现友谊受损、持续疲劳甚至自杀行为同样,与政治分歧有关的压力对持有不同政治观点的人的心理社会健康产生附加影响,从而对身心健康产生有害影响。众所周知,政治两极分化的有害影响是一种持续存在的压力源,它扰乱了社会,并通过媒体、各种互联网平台和持续的新闻动态贯穿于日常生活中此外,美国心理协会认为政治是美国成年人压力的主要来源最近进行的一项调查结果显示,近40%的美国人报告说他们因政治而感到压力,近20%的人因社会动荡的影响而失眠,几乎同样数量的人厌倦了政治新闻除了政治压力的心理后果,French JA等人报告说,参与政治辩论的人血液皮质醇增加,皮肤电导增加,睾丸激素水平下降同样重要的是,理解政治两极分化损害心理健康的机制,以及如何管理它以避免其有害后果?这个机制很好理解,人们不能把自己从政治中孤立出来,因为每天都有大量的信息。其次,作为人类社会的一部分,一个人无法摆脱社会网络和个人身份。就负面影响而言,它们通过各种方式渗透,无论人们是积极参与政治还是被动的旁观者。例如,社交媒体上的骚扰、欺凌、哗众取宠的态度并不罕见,而个人政治辩论、贬低性评论及其与心理社会疾病的关联也有充分的记录邪教的灌输是另一个令人痛苦的现象,领导人通过劝说、思想改革和洗脑来强迫追随者,导致暴露在这种情况下的人口遭受巨大的痛苦,有时还包括他们的家人、朋友和整个社区有大量的研究指出了邪教政治的滥用效应及其不利的情感后果。在过去的许多年里,科学出版物广泛报道了邪教教化、虚假和神秘信息所造成的心理伤害巴基斯坦是一个南亚穆斯林国家,人口超过2.2亿,政治历史相对不稳定,社会经济和卫生指标非常糟糕。心理健康统计数据令人震惊,因为治疗差距很大,而且每年的国内生产总值(GDP)没有专门的预算拨款除了巴基斯坦现有的精神健康问题的沉重负担和传统上根深蒂固的宗教不容忍之外,最近的政治不容忍浪潮使社会两极分化达到前所未有的程度。这种政治两极分化的浪潮已经渗透到社会的各个阶层,零星的暴力报道,在不受监管和过度使用社交媒体的情况下,这种情况可能会进一步恶化。对社交媒体报道的广泛消费而不核实其真实性可能是社会和政治两极分化的根源之一,这可能在不久的将来导致进一步恶化令人遗憾的是,约占巴基斯坦人口60%的年轻人更容易受到该国两极分化环境的影响,否则他们应该是社会中最具生产力的部分。 事实上,剥夺他们的批判性思维和制定和提出适当问题的能力,无异于巨大的社会资本损失。科学文献表明,在一个两极分化的社会中,年轻人更容易受到影响,更容易变得激进,不幸的是,巴基斯坦也不例外,目前是支持这种趋势增长的肥沃土壤非专业媒体最近发表的报道指出,由于政治竞争和社交媒体上截然不同的帖子,该国各地的暴力局势令人震惊。先前发表的研究广泛报道了人们在心理上受到政治两极分化影响的脆弱性。各种各样的报告表明,长期暴露在政治压力下与焦虑、抑郁甚至自杀行为等精神疾病的发病率增加有关同样,心理健康专业人员也面临着政治环境不友好的困境,这突出表明需要进一步培训,以便在临床环境中不带评判或偏见地处理这些问题科学界、社会科学家、政界、宗教界舆论人士应该展开对话,提高人们对两极化的可能原因和破坏性影响的认识。像我们这样有着根深蒂固的宗教不容忍、经济不平等、社会不平等和令人担忧的心理健康统计数据的国家,不能在激烈的两极分化政治话语的背景下陷入另一场社会和心理混乱。我们需要鼓励我们的年轻一代更加宽容,具备批判性思维,以优雅和科学的推理来应对社会挑战,以抵御即将到来的两极分化、激进化和心理疾病的冲击。巴基斯坦迫切需要恢复失去的政治理智,并彻底制止日益严重的社会心理动荡。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ
Khyber Medical University Journal-KMUJ MEDICINE, GENERAL & INTERNAL-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
15
审稿时长
20 weeks
期刊最新文献
Reducing the risks of nuclear war—the role of health professionals Glasgow Blatchford scoring system enables accurate risk stratification of patients with upper gastrointestinal haemorrhage Prevalence of methicillin resistant staphylococcus aureus in Rashid hospital, Dubai, United Arab Emirates Munchausen syndrome - a case series at Camp Jail Lahore, Pakistan Mediating role of emotion disclosure between emotion regulation and apprehension in healthcare professionals during COVID-19
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1