Private Equity Blues: Warner Music Group, Nonesuch Records, and Jazz in the Era of Financialization

IF 0.2 1区 艺术学 N/A MUSIC Journal of the Society for American Music Pub Date : 2023-07-03 DOI:10.1017/S1752196323000160
D. Chapman
{"title":"Private Equity Blues: Warner Music Group, Nonesuch Records, and Jazz in the Era of Financialization","authors":"D. Chapman","doi":"10.1017/S1752196323000160","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract Since the 1980s, the Nonesuch label, a longstanding subsidiary of the Warner Music Group (WMG), has become noteworthy for its steady market performance during a period of volatility for media multinationals. Nonesuch Records, having once been an adventurous boutique classical label under Teresa Sterne, has developed over the last three decades as a creatively idiosyncratic and commercially successful “adult” imprint under Robert Hurwitz, the erstwhile director of the Munich-based Edition of Contemporary Music jazz label. Nonesuch has not historically been understood as a jazz label, though it has served as a home for a few jazz acts, including Bill Frisell, Fred Hersch, and the World Saxophone Quartet. By the early years of the new millennium, though, Nonesuch had become one of the few major label subsidiaries willing to maintain an active roster of jazz instrumentalists, harnessing its diversified roster as a source of strength. This paper examines the Nonesuch label's cultivation of a distinctive jazz niche and situates this development against the backdrop of a period of structural turbulence for the WMG. The leveraged buyout of WMG in 2004, which precipitated the dissolution of the Warner Jazz subsidiary and the transfer of much of its jazz roster to Nonesuch, reflects a contemporary logic of financialization, where value extraction has become the overriding goal of corporate restructuring. Mergers and acquisitions enacted at the uppermost reaches of major label corporate hierarchies pass along significant costs to the label subsidiaries and their artist rosters, installing precarity at the core of the music industry's creative ecologies.","PeriodicalId":42557,"journal":{"name":"Journal of the Society for American Music","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2023-07-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of the Society for American Music","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1017/S1752196323000160","RegionNum":1,"RegionCategory":"艺术学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"N/A","JCRName":"MUSIC","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract Since the 1980s, the Nonesuch label, a longstanding subsidiary of the Warner Music Group (WMG), has become noteworthy for its steady market performance during a period of volatility for media multinationals. Nonesuch Records, having once been an adventurous boutique classical label under Teresa Sterne, has developed over the last three decades as a creatively idiosyncratic and commercially successful “adult” imprint under Robert Hurwitz, the erstwhile director of the Munich-based Edition of Contemporary Music jazz label. Nonesuch has not historically been understood as a jazz label, though it has served as a home for a few jazz acts, including Bill Frisell, Fred Hersch, and the World Saxophone Quartet. By the early years of the new millennium, though, Nonesuch had become one of the few major label subsidiaries willing to maintain an active roster of jazz instrumentalists, harnessing its diversified roster as a source of strength. This paper examines the Nonesuch label's cultivation of a distinctive jazz niche and situates this development against the backdrop of a period of structural turbulence for the WMG. The leveraged buyout of WMG in 2004, which precipitated the dissolution of the Warner Jazz subsidiary and the transfer of much of its jazz roster to Nonesuch, reflects a contemporary logic of financialization, where value extraction has become the overriding goal of corporate restructuring. Mergers and acquisitions enacted at the uppermost reaches of major label corporate hierarchies pass along significant costs to the label subsidiaries and their artist rosters, installing precarity at the core of the music industry's creative ecologies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
私募蓝调:金融化时代的华纳音乐集团、诺伊苏唱片和爵士乐
摘要自20世纪80年代以来,作为华纳音乐集团(WMG)的长期子公司,Nonesuch唱片公司因其在媒体跨国公司动荡时期的稳定市场表现而引人注目。Nonesuch Records曾是Teresa Sterne旗下的一家富有冒险精神的精品古典唱片公司,在过去三十年中,在慕尼黑当代音乐爵士唱片公司前总监Robert Hurwitz的领导下,它已发展成为一家具有创造性、独特且商业上成功的“成人”唱片公司。Nonesuch在历史上并没有被理解为一个爵士乐品牌,尽管它曾是一些爵士乐表演的发源地,包括Bill Frisell、Fred Hersch和世界萨克斯四重奏。然而,到了新千年的最初几年,Nonesuch已经成为少数几个愿意保持活跃的爵士乐器演奏家名册的主要厂牌子公司之一,利用其多元化的名册作为力量来源。本文考察了Nonesuch唱片公司对独特爵士乐小众的培养,并将这一发展置于WMG结构动荡时期的背景下。2004年对WMG的杠杆收购促成了华纳爵士子公司的解散,并将其大部分爵士乐名册转移给了Nonesuch,这反映了当代金融化的逻辑,在这种逻辑中,价值提取已成为公司重组的首要目标。在主要唱片公司层级的最高层进行的合并和收购将给唱片公司的子公司及其艺人名册带来了巨大的成本,这在音乐行业的创意生态的核心地带带来了不确定性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.90
自引率
0.00%
发文量
49
期刊最新文献
Binational Indianism in James DeMars’s Guadalupe, Our Lady of the Roses Joshua McCarter Simpson's Songs and Mid-Nineteenth Century Antislavery Activism Opera and Land: Settler Colonialism and the Geopolitics of Music at the Carlisle Indian Industrial School Heitor Villa-Lobos and the Traces of Coloniality in Andrés Segovia's Guitar Repertoire Ry Cooder and Taj Mahal. Get on Board. Nonesuch/Warner Records, 2022, CD.
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1