Working with reverberations: new ways for small towns

IF 1.2 Q2 Social Sciences Australian Planner Pub Date : 2020-03-14 DOI:10.1080/07293682.2020.1739098
Matt Novacevski, S. Meadows
{"title":"Working with reverberations: new ways for small towns","authors":"Matt Novacevski, S. Meadows","doi":"10.1080/07293682.2020.1739098","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT Typically, metropolitan governance literature and practice has lacked focus on the ways that processes of urbanisation affect rural areas or small towns. As urbanisation is increasingly recognised as a process that reverberates across peri-urban and rural regions, the entwined and interdependent nature of governance across scales becomes evident. This interaction is recognised in the 2017 iteration of Plan Melbourne’s directions relating to peri-urban and regional areas. This illustrates the need for planning to respond to opportunities and challenges arising from interactions between small towns and metropolitan governance. This article investigates these gaps in two ways: Firstly, by introducing the idea of reverberations to describe the effects of external factors like metropolitan governance exert on lived experience in small towns. Secondly, we use reflective practice to explore how working with those reverberations has shaped the development of a place-based ecological model for small-town planning. Informed by the work of practitioners and scholars such as Randolph Hester, David Seamon and Patsy Healey, the place-based ecological model innovates by bringing a phenomenological and relational sensibility to planning, fostering place-based assets to allow for responses to reverberations, and address existing gaps in planning practice. The article then suggests future directions for the evolution of small-town planning and governance frameworks.","PeriodicalId":45599,"journal":{"name":"Australian Planner","volume":"56 1","pages":"134 - 143"},"PeriodicalIF":1.2000,"publicationDate":"2020-03-14","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/07293682.2020.1739098","citationCount":"3","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Australian Planner","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/07293682.2020.1739098","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"Social Sciences","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 3

Abstract

ABSTRACT Typically, metropolitan governance literature and practice has lacked focus on the ways that processes of urbanisation affect rural areas or small towns. As urbanisation is increasingly recognised as a process that reverberates across peri-urban and rural regions, the entwined and interdependent nature of governance across scales becomes evident. This interaction is recognised in the 2017 iteration of Plan Melbourne’s directions relating to peri-urban and regional areas. This illustrates the need for planning to respond to opportunities and challenges arising from interactions between small towns and metropolitan governance. This article investigates these gaps in two ways: Firstly, by introducing the idea of reverberations to describe the effects of external factors like metropolitan governance exert on lived experience in small towns. Secondly, we use reflective practice to explore how working with those reverberations has shaped the development of a place-based ecological model for small-town planning. Informed by the work of practitioners and scholars such as Randolph Hester, David Seamon and Patsy Healey, the place-based ecological model innovates by bringing a phenomenological and relational sensibility to planning, fostering place-based assets to allow for responses to reverberations, and address existing gaps in planning practice. The article then suggests future directions for the evolution of small-town planning and governance frameworks.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
利用混响:小城镇的新方法
通常,城市治理文献和实践缺乏对城市化进程影响农村地区或小城镇的方式的关注。随着人们越来越认识到城市化是一个在城市周边和农村地区产生影响的过程,跨尺度治理的相互交织和相互依存的性质变得明显。这种相互作用在2017年墨尔本规划与城郊和区域有关的方向中得到了认可。这说明需要进行规划,以应对小城镇与都市治理之间相互作用所产生的机遇和挑战。本文从两个方面探讨了这些差异:首先,通过引入回响的概念来描述城市治理等外部因素对小城镇生活体验的影响。其次,我们使用反思性实践来探索如何利用这些回响来塑造基于地点的小城镇规划生态模型的发展。根据Randolph Hester, David Seamon和Patsy Healey等实践者和学者的工作,基于地的生态模型通过将现象学和关系敏感性引入规划,培育基于地的资产以允许对反响做出反应,并解决规划实践中的现有差距来进行创新。然后,文章提出了小城镇规划和治理框架演变的未来方向。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Australian Planner
Australian Planner REGIONAL & URBAN PLANNING-
CiteScore
2.40
自引率
0.00%
发文量
12
期刊最新文献
The impact of the COVID-19 pandemic on the music industries of Brisbane and an evaluation of the policy response Planning for open space and recreation in new high density areas: a reply to Marriott Practice reflections on the pandemic from South East Queensland Planning with foresight and resilience: the Planning Institute of Australia National Congress in Adelaide 2023 How have South Australian urban planning policies affected Blakeview’s surface temperatures?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1