Building Solidarity in the Field of Asylum: From an Abstract Principle to an Effective Policy?

IF 0.2 Q4 INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto Pub Date : 2022-12-13 DOI:10.18543/ced.2587
Alfredo Dos Santos Soares
{"title":"Building Solidarity in the Field of Asylum: From an Abstract Principle to an Effective Policy?","authors":"Alfredo Dos Santos Soares","doi":"10.18543/ced.2587","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Solidarity is widely present in European Union legislation. Several primary law provisions reflect its articulation, simultaneously assuming it as a value, an objective and a principle. Article 80 TFEU provides that the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility between Member States is the “guiding principle” of all common Union policies on border management, asylum, and immigration. Despite all this, solidarity has so far lacked a clear definition and meaning, appearing rather as an “amorphous concept”. Indeed, political narrative recognises solidarity as “the glue that holds our Union together”. However, in practice and as far as asylum is concerned, the conception according to which “solidarity must be given voluntarily, it must come from the heart, it cannot be forced” seems to prevail. By critically reviewing the relevant literature and the CJEU’s jurisprudence, this paper pursues a twofold purpose: examining the doctrinal debates on the nature, scope and (abstract or binding) character of the solidarity principle; and gauging the role that the CJEU may be playing towards an effective solidarity, uncovering the constitutional bases that prevent from continuing to treat solidarity, in its multiple manifestations and policy areas, in particular that of asylum, as little less than the stone guest. \nReceived: 31 July 2022Accepted: 10 October 2022","PeriodicalId":40611,"journal":{"name":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-13","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Cuadernos Europeos de Deusto","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.18543/ced.2587","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"INTERNATIONAL RELATIONS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Solidarity is widely present in European Union legislation. Several primary law provisions reflect its articulation, simultaneously assuming it as a value, an objective and a principle. Article 80 TFEU provides that the principle of solidarity and fair sharing of responsibility between Member States is the “guiding principle” of all common Union policies on border management, asylum, and immigration. Despite all this, solidarity has so far lacked a clear definition and meaning, appearing rather as an “amorphous concept”. Indeed, political narrative recognises solidarity as “the glue that holds our Union together”. However, in practice and as far as asylum is concerned, the conception according to which “solidarity must be given voluntarily, it must come from the heart, it cannot be forced” seems to prevail. By critically reviewing the relevant literature and the CJEU’s jurisprudence, this paper pursues a twofold purpose: examining the doctrinal debates on the nature, scope and (abstract or binding) character of the solidarity principle; and gauging the role that the CJEU may be playing towards an effective solidarity, uncovering the constitutional bases that prevent from continuing to treat solidarity, in its multiple manifestations and policy areas, in particular that of asylum, as little less than the stone guest. Received: 31 July 2022Accepted: 10 October 2022
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在庇护领域建立团结:从抽象原则到有效政策?
团结在欧洲联盟立法中广泛存在。一些主要法律条款反映了它的表述,同时将其视为一种价值、一种目标和一项原则。TFEU第80条规定,成员国之间团结一致和公平分担责任的原则是欧盟关于边境管理、庇护和移民的所有共同政策的“指导原则”。尽管如此,团结迄今为止缺乏明确的定义和意义,表现为一个“无定形的概念”。事实上,政治叙事承认团结是“维系我们联盟的粘合剂”。然而,在实践中,就庇护而言,“团结必须是自愿的,必须发自内心,不能强迫”的概念似乎占了上风。通过批判性地回顾相关文献和欧盟法院的判例,本文追求双重目的:审查关于团结原则的性质、范围和(抽象或有约束力的)性质的理论辩论;衡量欧盟法院在实现有效团结方面可能发挥的作用,揭示阻止在多种表现形式和政策领域,特别是庇护领域,继续将团结视为石客的宪法基础。接收日期:2022年7月31日接受日期:2022月10日
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
20.00%
发文量
41
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊介绍: Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is a university journal specialised in the study of the European Union from an interdisciplinary perspective. It primarily aims at disseminating knowledge on the different aspects of the European construction process (historical, political, legal, economic, social, cultural issues, etc.). It also aims at encouraging reflection on and critical assessment of the different factors that determine European Union''s evolution and transformation. First published in 1987, Deusto Journal of European Studies (DJES) is issued twice a year. Its contents include a section on doctrinal articles, a section commenting the jurisprudence of the EU Court of Justice and a section on current European issues.
期刊最新文献
A vueltas con la regulación de las aguas de baño en la Unión Europea: ¿hacer de la necesidad, virtud? Actualidad institucional y económica de España en el marco de la Unión Europea (julio de 2024) Crónica de la Jurisprudencia del Tribunal de Justicia de la Unión Europea Primer semestre de 2024 La protección del medio ambiente en situaciones de conflicto armado: implicaciones para la Unión Europea a raíz de la guerra de Ucrania El sesgado desarrollo del convenio de Aarhus en la Unión Europea. ¿Justicia para el medioambiente?
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1