Patentability of mathematical modelling and simulation methods

Q4 Engineering Rakenteiden Mekaniikka Pub Date : 2019-07-12 DOI:10.23998/RM.76251
S. Holopainen, Olli-Pekka Piirilä, Antti Salmela
{"title":"Patentability of mathematical modelling and simulation methods","authors":"S. Holopainen, Olli-Pekka Piirilä, Antti Salmela","doi":"10.23998/RM.76251","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"\"Patentability\" refers to conditions laid down by law to what can be patented and what cannot. In this study, changes in the patentability of simulation methods are compared with the rapid development of computational science since 1970s. Although technological progress has caused computational simulation and modelling methods to grow to an everyday tool of technology, these methods have traditionally been excluded from patentability as \"non-technical subject matter\" or \"abstract ideas\". We describe the changes in patentability criteria in Europe and in the USA, and illustrate the development of patenting activity in this field during the last decade. Practisers should be aware of these changes, and investigate the possibilities they might offer.","PeriodicalId":52331,"journal":{"name":"Rakenteiden Mekaniikka","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2019-07-12","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Rakenteiden Mekaniikka","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.23998/RM.76251","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"Engineering","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

"Patentability" refers to conditions laid down by law to what can be patented and what cannot. In this study, changes in the patentability of simulation methods are compared with the rapid development of computational science since 1970s. Although technological progress has caused computational simulation and modelling methods to grow to an everyday tool of technology, these methods have traditionally been excluded from patentability as "non-technical subject matter" or "abstract ideas". We describe the changes in patentability criteria in Europe and in the USA, and illustrate the development of patenting activity in this field during the last decade. Practisers should be aware of these changes, and investigate the possibilities they might offer.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
数学建模和模拟方法的可专利性
“可专利性”是指法律规定的哪些可以获得专利,哪些不能获得专利的条件。在这项研究中,将模拟方法专利性的变化与20世纪70年代以来计算科学的快速发展进行了比较。尽管技术进步使计算模拟和建模方法发展成为一种日常技术工具,但这些方法传统上被排除在“非技术主题”或“抽象思想”的专利范围之外。我们描述了欧洲和美国专利标准的变化,并说明了过去十年该领域专利活动的发展。练习者应该意识到这些变化,并调查它们可能提供的可能性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Rakenteiden Mekaniikka
Rakenteiden Mekaniikka Engineering-Mechanical Engineering
CiteScore
0.50
自引率
0.00%
发文量
2
审稿时长
16 weeks
期刊最新文献
Numerical investigation of box shape effects on soil direct shear test Evaluation of machine learning techniques for capacity prediction of cold-formed steel beams subjected to bending Djebar Baroudin muistoa kunnioittaen Jari Laukkasen muistoa kunnioittaen Tekninen selvitys: Tarkkoja elementtejä helposti
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1