Reasoning The Sharīʿa and Constructing a Proper Muslim Woman: Reflections on the Issue of Chinese Muslim Women's Haircut in Republican China

IF 0.5 0 ASIAN STUDIES Journal of Chinese Religions Pub Date : 2022-11-01 DOI:10.1353/jcr.2022.0010
Gang Li
{"title":"Reasoning The Sharīʿa and Constructing a Proper Muslim Woman: Reflections on the Issue of Chinese Muslim Women's Haircut in Republican China","authors":"Gang Li","doi":"10.1353/jcr.2022.0010","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:The major Muslim group in China, the Hui, discussed the issue of haircut for Muslim women in their own newspapers and magazines in the 1930s. Authors of those publications include ordinary male and female Hui Muslims, Islamic clerics, and Muslim students from the new Islamic educational institutions. Based on various sources of Islamic jurisprudence (Sharīʿa), the participants put forward varying opinions on the issue. In this article, I have investigated the debate on the Hui women's haircut by assessing how the debate started and developed, and what it meant for a Hui Muslim woman to cut or not to cut her hair in relation to the Sharīʿa in the sociopolitical context of Republican China. I argue that different narratives tried to construct a proper Muslim woman, and furthermore, I also assess how Muslims in China during the Republican period defined their own identities of being Chinese and Muslim via debating on the \"authentic\" interpretation of the Sharīʿa. Finally, I point out that liberation of Chinese Muslim women is impossible unless there is comprehensive participation of them in the debate.摘要:在一九叁〇年代,作爲中國穆斯林主體的囘族在其創辦的各類報紙及雜志上討論了關於穆斯林女性剪髮的議題。參與這一討論的作者包括普通男女穆斯林,伊斯蘭神職人員,以及來自新式伊斯蘭教育機構的穆斯林學生們。基於多種伊斯蘭教法(沙里亞)法源,這些參與者們對該議題提出了不同的看法。本文就圍繞囘族婦女剪髮而產生的討論進行了研究,對其發生和發展進行了評價,并由此説明在民國時期特定的社會政治語境中,剪或者不剪髮對囘族穆斯林女性而言在教法上到底意味著什麽。我主張,首先,在這場辯論中各方不同的敘事都旨在建構一個合格的穆斯林女性。此外,我進一步研究了,民國時期的中國穆斯林是如何通過對所謂沙里亞\"真正\"含義的論辯來定義其作爲「中國人」與作爲「穆斯林」的身份認同的。最後,本文指出,如果沒有穆斯林女性自身在該討論中的全面參與,就不可能有穆斯林女性的解放。","PeriodicalId":53120,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Chinese Religions","volume":null,"pages":null},"PeriodicalIF":0.5000,"publicationDate":"2022-11-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Chinese Religions","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/jcr.2022.0010","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ASIAN STUDIES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:The major Muslim group in China, the Hui, discussed the issue of haircut for Muslim women in their own newspapers and magazines in the 1930s. Authors of those publications include ordinary male and female Hui Muslims, Islamic clerics, and Muslim students from the new Islamic educational institutions. Based on various sources of Islamic jurisprudence (Sharīʿa), the participants put forward varying opinions on the issue. In this article, I have investigated the debate on the Hui women's haircut by assessing how the debate started and developed, and what it meant for a Hui Muslim woman to cut or not to cut her hair in relation to the Sharīʿa in the sociopolitical context of Republican China. I argue that different narratives tried to construct a proper Muslim woman, and furthermore, I also assess how Muslims in China during the Republican period defined their own identities of being Chinese and Muslim via debating on the "authentic" interpretation of the Sharīʿa. Finally, I point out that liberation of Chinese Muslim women is impossible unless there is comprehensive participation of them in the debate.摘要:在一九叁〇年代,作爲中國穆斯林主體的囘族在其創辦的各類報紙及雜志上討論了關於穆斯林女性剪髮的議題。參與這一討論的作者包括普通男女穆斯林,伊斯蘭神職人員,以及來自新式伊斯蘭教育機構的穆斯林學生們。基於多種伊斯蘭教法(沙里亞)法源,這些參與者們對該議題提出了不同的看法。本文就圍繞囘族婦女剪髮而產生的討論進行了研究,對其發生和發展進行了評價,并由此説明在民國時期特定的社會政治語境中,剪或者不剪髮對囘族穆斯林女性而言在教法上到底意味著什麽。我主張,首先,在這場辯論中各方不同的敘事都旨在建構一個合格的穆斯林女性。此外,我進一步研究了,民國時期的中國穆斯林是如何通過對所謂沙里亞"真正"含義的論辯來定義其作爲「中國人」與作爲「穆斯林」的身份認同的。最後,本文指出,如果沒有穆斯林女性自身在該討論中的全面參與,就不可能有穆斯林女性的解放。
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
《沙尔卡》的推理与正统穆斯林女性的建构:民国时期中国穆斯林女性发型问题的思考
摘要:20世纪30年代,中国主要的穆斯林群体回族在自己的报纸和杂志上讨论了穆斯林妇女的理发问题。这些出版物的作者包括普通男女回族穆斯林、伊斯兰教神职人员和来自新的伊斯兰教育机构的穆斯林学生。与会者根据伊斯兰法学的不同来源,对这一问题提出了不同的意见。在这篇文章中,我通过评估辩论是如何开始和发展的,以及在民国的社会政治背景下,回族穆斯林妇女剪头发或不剪头发意味着什么,来调查关于回族妇女理发的辩论。我认为,不同的叙事试图构建一个合适的穆斯林妇女,此外,我也评估了中国的穆斯林如何在民国时期定义自己的身份,作为中国人和穆斯林,通过辩论“真实”的解释沙尔尼亚。最后,我指出,中国穆斯林妇女的解放,除非她们全面参与辩论,否则是不可能的。參與這一討論的作者包括普通男女穆斯林,伊斯蘭神職人員,以及來自新式伊斯蘭教育機構的穆斯林學生們。基於多種伊斯蘭教法(沙里亞)法源,這些參與者們對該議題提出了不同的看法。本文就圍繞囘族婦女剪髮而產生的討論進行了研究,對其發生和發展進行了評價,并由此説明在民國時期特定的社會政治語境中,剪或者不剪髮對囘族穆斯林女性而言在教法上到底意味著什麽。我主張,首先,在這場辯論中各方不同的敘事都旨在建構一個合格的穆斯林女性。此外,我進一步研究了,民國時期的中國穆斯林是如何通過對所謂沙里亞"真正"含義的論辯來定義其作爲「中國人」與作爲「穆斯林」的身份認同的。最後,本文指出,如果沒有穆斯林女性自身在該討論中的全面參與,就不可能有穆斯林女性的解放。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.10
自引率
11.10%
发文量
0
期刊介绍: The Journal of Chinese Religions is an international, peer-reviewed journal, published under the auspices of the Society for the Study of Chinese Religions (SSCR). Since its founding, the Journal has provided a forum for studies in Chinese religions from a great variety of disciplinary perspectives, including religious studies, philology, history, art history, anthropology, sociology, political science, archaeology, and literary studies. The Journal welcomes original research articles, shorter research notes, essays, and field reports on all aspects of Chinese religions in all historical periods. All submissions need to undergo double-blind peer review before they can be accepted for publication.
期刊最新文献
Au tribunal du repentir: La proscription du catholicisme en Chine (1724–1860) by Pierre-Emmanuel Roux (review) The Sound of Salvation: Voice, Gender, and the Sufi Mediascape in China by Guangtian Ha (review) More Than Curing the Sick: A Re-Examination of Medicine Buddha Worship in Medieval China Lineages Embedded in Temple Networks: Daoism and Local Society in Ming China by Richard G. Wang (review) Lotus Blossoms and Purple Clouds: Monastic Buddhism in Post-Mao China by Brian J. Nichols (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1