An Explicit Form With Continuous Attribute Profile of the Partial Mastery DINA Model

IF 1.9 3区 心理学 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics Pub Date : 2023-04-10 DOI:10.3102/10769986231159436
Tian Shu, Guanzhong Luo, Zhaosheng Luo, Xiaofeng Yu, Xiaojun Guo, Yujun Li
{"title":"An Explicit Form With Continuous Attribute Profile of the Partial Mastery DINA Model","authors":"Tian Shu, Guanzhong Luo, Zhaosheng Luo, Xiaofeng Yu, Xiaojun Guo, Yujun Li","doi":"10.3102/10769986231159436","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are the statistical framework for cognitive diagnostic assessment in education and psychology. They generally assume that subjects’ latent attributes are dichotomous—mastery or nonmastery, which seems quite deterministic. As an alternative to dichotomous attribute mastery, attention is drawn to the use of a continuous attribute mastery format in recent literature. To obtain subjects’ finer-grained attribute mastery for more precise diagnosis and guidance, an equivalent but more explicit form of the partial-mastery-deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA) model (termed continuous attribute profile [CAP]-DINA form) is proposed in this article. Its parameters estimation algorithm based on this form using Bayesian techniques with Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is also presented. Two simulation studies are conducted then to explore its parameter recovery and model misspecification, and the results demonstrate that the CAP-DINA form performs robustly with satisfactory efficiency in these two aspects. A real data study of the English test also indicates it has a better model fit than DINA.","PeriodicalId":48001,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","volume":"48 1","pages":"573 - 602"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics","FirstCategoryId":"102","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.3102/10769986231159436","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"心理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

Cognitive diagnosis models (CDMs) are the statistical framework for cognitive diagnostic assessment in education and psychology. They generally assume that subjects’ latent attributes are dichotomous—mastery or nonmastery, which seems quite deterministic. As an alternative to dichotomous attribute mastery, attention is drawn to the use of a continuous attribute mastery format in recent literature. To obtain subjects’ finer-grained attribute mastery for more precise diagnosis and guidance, an equivalent but more explicit form of the partial-mastery-deterministic inputs, noisy “and” gate (DINA) model (termed continuous attribute profile [CAP]-DINA form) is proposed in this article. Its parameters estimation algorithm based on this form using Bayesian techniques with Markov chain Monte Carlo algorithm is also presented. Two simulation studies are conducted then to explore its parameter recovery and model misspecification, and the results demonstrate that the CAP-DINA form performs robustly with satisfactory efficiency in these two aspects. A real data study of the English test also indicates it has a better model fit than DINA.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
部分Mastery DINA模型的一个具有连续属性轮廓的显式形式
认知诊断模型(CDMs)是教育和心理学认知诊断评估的统计框架。他们普遍假设被试的潜在属性是二分类的——精通或不精通,这似乎是相当确定的。作为二分类属性掌握的替代方法,在最近的文献中,人们注意到连续属性掌握格式的使用。为了获得受试者的细粒度属性掌握,以便更精确地进行诊断和指导,本文提出了一种等效但更明确的部分掌握确定性输入形式,即噪声“和”门(DINA)模型(称为连续属性轮廓[CAP]-DINA形式)。在此基础上,利用贝叶斯技术和马尔可夫链蒙特卡罗算法对其参数进行估计。在此基础上,对CAP-DINA形式的参数恢复和模型错配进行了两次仿真研究,结果表明CAP-DINA形式在参数恢复和模型错配两方面都具有较好的鲁棒性。对英语测试的真实数据研究也表明,它比DINA具有更好的模型拟合。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
4.40
自引率
4.20%
发文量
21
期刊介绍: Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics, sponsored jointly by the American Educational Research Association and the American Statistical Association, publishes articles that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also of interest. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority. The Journal of Educational and Behavioral Statistics provides an outlet for papers that are original and provide methods that are useful to those studying problems and issues in educational or behavioral research. Typical papers introduce new methods of analysis, provide properties of these methods, and an example of use in education or behavioral research. Critical reviews of current practice, tutorial presentations of less well known methods, and novel applications of already-known methods are also sometimes accepted. Papers discussing statistical techniques without specific educational or behavioral interest or focusing on substantive results without developing new statistical methods or models or making novel use of existing methods have lower priority. Simulation studies, either to demonstrate properties of an existing method or to compare several existing methods (without providing a new method), also have low priority.
期刊最新文献
Improving Balance in Educational Measurement: A Legacy of E. F. Lindquist A Simple Technique Assessing Ordinal and Disordinal Interaction Effects A Comparison of Latent Semantic Analysis and Latent Dirichlet Allocation in Educational Measurement Sample Size Calculation and Optimal Design for Multivariate Regression-Based Norming Corrigendum to Power Approximations for Overall Average Effects in Meta-Analysis With Dependent Effect Sizes
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1