Asymptomatic median neuropathy in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy

IF 0.4 4区 医学 Q4 NEUROSCIENCES Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology Pub Date : 2021-10-01 DOI:10.4103/nsn.nsn_54_21
M. Alemdar
{"title":"Asymptomatic median neuropathy in patients with diabetic polyneuropathy","authors":"M. Alemdar","doi":"10.4103/nsn.nsn_54_21","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Aim: This study aims to investigate whether asymptomatic median neuropathy (AMN) in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (DPNP) is a result of polyneuropathic involvement of median nerve (MN) or its true entrapment. Subjects and Methods: We determined the grades of the Michigan severity scale and the rates of peripheral nerve conduction abnormalities in study subgroups, including patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), AMN, and normal MN conductions to highlight if the severity of polyneuropathic involvement was different between them. In addition, the results of conventional and comparative nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were compared between these study subgroups. Results: Distributions of Michigan grades and rates of abnormalities in peroneal and sural NCSs were similar between the subgroups (P > 0.05 for all analyses). Abnormality rates of ulnar NCSs were higher in the AMN group than in the other groups, whereas those of comparative transcarpal NCSs were higher in the CTS group. The mean distal sensory latency (DSL) and motor latency (DML) of MN were longer, sensory conduction velocity (SCV) was slower in the CTS group than AMN group, whereas MN motor conduction velocity (MCV) was slower, UN DSL was longer, SCV was slower, SNAP amplitude was smaller, DML was longer, and MCV were slower in the AMN group (P < 0.05 for all analyses). Discussion: Our findings reveal that grade of polyneuropathic involvement is more prominent in AMN, whereas transcarpal MN conduction delay is greater in CTS. The results of the study suggest that the prominence of polyneuropathic impairment in addition to a lesser degree of MN sheet compression obscures the clinical signs in patients with diabetes with AMN.","PeriodicalId":48555,"journal":{"name":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","volume":"38 1","pages":"234 - 244"},"PeriodicalIF":0.4000,"publicationDate":"2021-10-01","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.4103/nsn.nsn_54_21","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"NEUROSCIENCES","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Aim: This study aims to investigate whether asymptomatic median neuropathy (AMN) in patients with diabetic peripheral polyneuropathy (DPNP) is a result of polyneuropathic involvement of median nerve (MN) or its true entrapment. Subjects and Methods: We determined the grades of the Michigan severity scale and the rates of peripheral nerve conduction abnormalities in study subgroups, including patients with carpal tunnel syndrome (CTS), AMN, and normal MN conductions to highlight if the severity of polyneuropathic involvement was different between them. In addition, the results of conventional and comparative nerve conduction studies (NCSs) were compared between these study subgroups. Results: Distributions of Michigan grades and rates of abnormalities in peroneal and sural NCSs were similar between the subgroups (P > 0.05 for all analyses). Abnormality rates of ulnar NCSs were higher in the AMN group than in the other groups, whereas those of comparative transcarpal NCSs were higher in the CTS group. The mean distal sensory latency (DSL) and motor latency (DML) of MN were longer, sensory conduction velocity (SCV) was slower in the CTS group than AMN group, whereas MN motor conduction velocity (MCV) was slower, UN DSL was longer, SCV was slower, SNAP amplitude was smaller, DML was longer, and MCV were slower in the AMN group (P < 0.05 for all analyses). Discussion: Our findings reveal that grade of polyneuropathic involvement is more prominent in AMN, whereas transcarpal MN conduction delay is greater in CTS. The results of the study suggest that the prominence of polyneuropathic impairment in addition to a lesser degree of MN sheet compression obscures the clinical signs in patients with diabetes with AMN.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
糖尿病多发神经病患者无症状正中神经病变
目的:本研究旨在探讨糖尿病周围型多发性神经病(DPNP)患者的无症状正中神经病变(AMN)是否是正中神经(MN)的多发性病变受累或其真正卡压的结果。受试者和方法:我们确定了研究亚组(包括腕管综合征(CTS)、AMN和正常MN传导的患者)的密歇根严重程度等级和外周神经传导异常率,以强调他们之间多发性神经病的严重程度是否不同。此外,对这些研究亚组之间的常规和比较神经传导研究(NCS)的结果进行了比较。结果:Michigan分级的分布以及腓神经和腓肠神经NCS的异常率在各亚组之间相似(所有分析均P>0.05)。AMN组尺侧NCSs的异常率高于其他组,而CTS组比较性跨腕骨NCSs的畸形率更高。CTS组MN的平均远端感觉潜伏期(DSL)和运动潜伏期(DML)比AMN组长,感觉传导速度(SCV)慢,而AMN组MN运动传导速度(MCV)慢,UN-DSL长,SCV慢,SNAP幅度小,DML长,MCV慢(所有分析均P<0.05)。讨论:我们的研究结果表明,AMN中多发性神经病的受累程度更为突出,而CTS中跨腕骨MN传导延迟更大。研究结果表明,在患有AMN的糖尿病患者中,除了MN片压迫程度较低外,多发性神经病损害的突出表现掩盖了临床症状。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
0.70
自引率
25.00%
发文量
4
审稿时长
26 weeks
期刊介绍: Neurological Sciences and Neurophysiology is the double blind peer-reviewed, open access, international publication organ of Turkish Society of Clinical Neurophysiology EEG-EMG. The journal is a quarterly publication, published in March, June, September and December and the publication language of the journal is English.
期刊最新文献
Transcranial Sonography in Parkinson’s Disease and Parkinsonism The liverpool adverse drug events profile (LAEP): Validity and reliability of Turkish version (LAEP-TR) Congenital myasthenic syndrome with a rare mutation diagnosed at adult age Comparison of surgery and local steroid injections for the treatment of carpal tunnel syndrome: A randomized controlled trial High-dose steroids versus standard treatment for myasthenic crisis: A single-center, longitudinal, 12-year retrospective study
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1