Reverse Engineering the Narrative: A.B. Nichols’s Failed Attempt to Amend the Canal Zone’s History

IF 0.2 0 HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY Latin Americanist Pub Date : 2021-04-10 DOI:10.1353/TLA.2021.0004
H. Jacob
{"title":"Reverse Engineering the Narrative: A.B. Nichols’s Failed Attempt to Amend the Canal Zone’s History","authors":"H. Jacob","doi":"10.1353/TLA.2021.0004","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Abstract:This paper endeavors to expose the mechanics of U.S. empire building through the battle between one forgotten man and his superior over how the construction of the Panama Canal should be remembered. The essay explores the previously unexamined diaries and photographs of Aurin Bugbee (A.B.) Nichols, an Office Engineer who worked for the Isthmian Canal Commission (ICC) from 1904–1915. In his archive of over a thousand pages, Nichols catalogued the smallest details of the canal’s construction. However, within the reams of meticulous scientific analysis, Nichols also questioned the triumphalist narrative of Panama, written by his boss at the ICC, its official Secretary and unofficial propagandist, Joseph Buck-lin Bishop. Nichols felt particularly compelled to protest when Bishop – a man appointed by President Roosevelt and later endorsed President Taft — privileged a flattering, rather than factual, depiction of the Zone. Nichols even created a minority report to counter Bishop’s authoritative valuation of the canal; whereas Bishop wished to present America’s purchase favorably, Nichols’s assessment revealed that the U.S. had slightly overpaid for the land. In his various publications, Bishop suppressed the engineer’s dissenting opinion, suggesting how creators of the official narrative must quiet opposing voices in order to present a uniformly powerful version of national acquisition. Still, Nichols continued to resist in subtle ways, even though he confined his grievances to fastidious letters and private fulminations. Given his career and his temperament, Nichols largely remained the dutiful bureaucrat. Moreover, his preference for detailed accuracy over narrative flourish rendered him incapable of producing a cohesive or sustained history of Panama. Still, his forgotten journals suggest that history is not a monolith. Even though Nichols’s precise calculations helped to construct the canal, his complicated story dismantled Bishop’s version of America’s imperial perfection.","PeriodicalId":42355,"journal":{"name":"Latin Americanist","volume":"65 1","pages":"55 - 83"},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2021-04-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1353/TLA.2021.0004","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Latin Americanist","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/TLA.2021.0004","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Abstract:This paper endeavors to expose the mechanics of U.S. empire building through the battle between one forgotten man and his superior over how the construction of the Panama Canal should be remembered. The essay explores the previously unexamined diaries and photographs of Aurin Bugbee (A.B.) Nichols, an Office Engineer who worked for the Isthmian Canal Commission (ICC) from 1904–1915. In his archive of over a thousand pages, Nichols catalogued the smallest details of the canal’s construction. However, within the reams of meticulous scientific analysis, Nichols also questioned the triumphalist narrative of Panama, written by his boss at the ICC, its official Secretary and unofficial propagandist, Joseph Buck-lin Bishop. Nichols felt particularly compelled to protest when Bishop – a man appointed by President Roosevelt and later endorsed President Taft — privileged a flattering, rather than factual, depiction of the Zone. Nichols even created a minority report to counter Bishop’s authoritative valuation of the canal; whereas Bishop wished to present America’s purchase favorably, Nichols’s assessment revealed that the U.S. had slightly overpaid for the land. In his various publications, Bishop suppressed the engineer’s dissenting opinion, suggesting how creators of the official narrative must quiet opposing voices in order to present a uniformly powerful version of national acquisition. Still, Nichols continued to resist in subtle ways, even though he confined his grievances to fastidious letters and private fulminations. Given his career and his temperament, Nichols largely remained the dutiful bureaucrat. Moreover, his preference for detailed accuracy over narrative flourish rendered him incapable of producing a cohesive or sustained history of Panama. Still, his forgotten journals suggest that history is not a monolith. Even though Nichols’s precise calculations helped to construct the canal, his complicated story dismantled Bishop’s version of America’s imperial perfection.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
逆向工程叙事:A.B.尼科尔斯修改运河区历史的失败尝试
摘要:本文试图通过一个被遗忘的人和他的上司之间关于如何记住巴拿马运河建设的斗争,揭示美国帝国建设的机制。这篇文章探讨了办公室工程师Aurin Bugbee(A.B.)Nichols之前未经审查的日记和照片,他在1904年至1915年间为地峡运河委员会(ICC)工作。在长达一千多页的档案中,尼科尔斯对运河建设的最小细节进行了编目。然而,在大量细致的科学分析中,尼科尔斯也对他在国际刑事法院的上司、国际刑事法院官方秘书兼非官方宣传人员约瑟夫·巴克林·毕晓普撰写的巴拿马必胜主义叙事提出了质疑。当毕晓普(Bishop)——一位由罗斯福总统任命、后来支持塔夫脱总统的人——特权地对特区进行了奉承而非事实的描述时,尼科尔斯感到特别有必要抗议。尼科尔斯甚至创建了一份少数派报告,以反驳毕晓普对运河的权威评估;尽管毕晓普希望对美国的收购表示赞同,但尼科尔斯的评估显示,美国对这块土地的出价略高。毕晓普在他的各种出版物中压制了这位工程师的反对意见,暗示官方叙事的创作者必须压制反对声音,才能呈现出一个统一有力的国家收购版本。尽管如此,尼科尔斯仍然以微妙的方式进行抵抗,尽管他将自己的不满局限于挑剔的信件和私下的斥责。考虑到他的职业和气质,尼科尔斯在很大程度上仍然是一个尽职尽责的官僚。此外,他更喜欢细节的准确性,而不是叙事的繁荣,这使他无法创作出一部连贯或持续的巴拿马历史。尽管如此,他被遗忘的日记表明,历史并不是一块巨石。尽管尼科尔斯的精确计算有助于建造运河,但他复杂的故事打破了毕晓普对美国帝国完美的描述。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Latin Americanist
Latin Americanist HUMANITIES, MULTIDISCIPLINARY-
自引率
0.00%
发文量
38
期刊最新文献
Jorge Luis Borges’s Gauchesca and the Issue of Genre Death Keep the Bones Alive: Missing People and the Search for Life in Brazil by Graham Denyer Willis (review) “Our Hemisphere”? The United States in Latin America, from 1776 to the Twenty-First Century by Britta H. Crandall and Russell C. Crandall (review) Communicating Coffee: Owners and Workers’ Role and Experiences during the Rise of Specialty Cafés in Two Mexican Cities, 2010–20 Brazilian Politics on Trial: Corruption & Reform under Democracy by Luciano Da Ros and Matthew M. Taylor (review)
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1