Practising school-home collaboration in upper secondary schools: to solve problems or to promote adolescents’ autonomy?

IF 1.9 Q2 EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH Pedagogy Culture and Society Pub Date : 2021-05-03 DOI:10.1080/14681366.2021.1923057
Gørill Warvik Vedeler
{"title":"Practising school-home collaboration in upper secondary schools: to solve problems or to promote adolescents’ autonomy?","authors":"Gørill Warvik Vedeler","doi":"10.1080/14681366.2021.1923057","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This article explores school-home collaboration as a pedagogical phenomenon and contributes to a rationale for collaboration between school and parents in upper secondary education. The theory of practice architectures is used as an analytical lens . It sheds light on arrangements that enable or constrain the semantic, social, and physical spaces where students, parents, and teachers encounter each other as collaborative partners. Six upper secondary schools participated in the study; the dialogue café method was used to facilitate conversations between stakeholders to explore and verify this phenomenon. The study revealed three key aspects that require attention when developing collaborative practices: (a) clarification of the teaching profession’s obligations; (b) engaging and empowering students’ agency; and (c) moving beyond a fire-fighting approach . In addition, the need for further research to operationalise the safeguarding of students’ and parents’ rights, and support for students’ agency, in the context of school-home collaboration.","PeriodicalId":46617,"journal":{"name":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","volume":"31 1","pages":"439 - 457"},"PeriodicalIF":1.9000,"publicationDate":"2021-05-03","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"https://sci-hub-pdf.com/10.1080/14681366.2021.1923057","citationCount":"2","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Pedagogy Culture and Society","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/14681366.2021.1923057","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 2

Abstract

ABSTRACT This article explores school-home collaboration as a pedagogical phenomenon and contributes to a rationale for collaboration between school and parents in upper secondary education. The theory of practice architectures is used as an analytical lens . It sheds light on arrangements that enable or constrain the semantic, social, and physical spaces where students, parents, and teachers encounter each other as collaborative partners. Six upper secondary schools participated in the study; the dialogue café method was used to facilitate conversations between stakeholders to explore and verify this phenomenon. The study revealed three key aspects that require attention when developing collaborative practices: (a) clarification of the teaching profession’s obligations; (b) engaging and empowering students’ agency; and (c) moving beyond a fire-fighting approach . In addition, the need for further research to operationalise the safeguarding of students’ and parents’ rights, and support for students’ agency, in the context of school-home collaboration.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在高中实施学校-家庭合作:解决问题还是促进青少年的自主性?
摘要本文探讨了学校-家庭合作作为一种教学现象,并为高中教育中学校和家长之间的合作提供了理论依据。实践架构的理论被用作分析的镜头。它揭示了允许或限制学生、家长和教师作为合作伙伴相遇的语义、社交和物理空间的安排。六所高中参加了这项研究;对话咖啡馆方法被用来促进利益相关者之间的对话,以探索和验证这一现象。该研究揭示了在发展合作实践时需要注意的三个关键方面:(a)澄清教师职业的义务;(b) 参与并赋予学生代理权;以及(c)超越消防方法。此外,需要进一步研究,以在学校与家庭合作的背景下,切实保障学生和家长的权利,并支持学生代理。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Pedagogy Culture and Society
Pedagogy Culture and Society EDUCATION & EDUCATIONAL RESEARCH-
CiteScore
3.60
自引率
10.00%
发文量
40
期刊介绍: Pedagogy, Culture & Society is a fully-refereed international journal that seeks to provide an international forum for pedagogy discussion and debate. The identity of the journal is built on the belief that pedagogy debate has the following features: •Pedagogy debate is not restricted by geographical boundaries: its participants are the international educational community and its proceedings appeal to a worldwide audience. •Pedagogy debate is open and democratic: it is not the preserve of teachers, politicians, academics or administrators but requires open discussion.
期刊最新文献
Strengthening Indigenous parents’ co-leadership through culturally responsive home-school partnerships: a practical implementation framework “The farmer, the guide, and the bridge”: the voice of community partners within European Service-Learning Personal, pedagogic play: a dialogic model for video game learning Nurturing inclusivity and professional growth among vocational teachers through communities of practice The manifestations of universality and cultural specificity in national curriculum policy frameworks: negotiations for culturally reflective practice in early childhood education
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1