Navigating Seas, Markets, and Sovereignties: Fishers and Occupational Slippage in the South China Sea

IF 0.8 3区 社会学 Q3 ANTHROPOLOGY Anthropological Quarterly Pub Date : 2022-01-22 DOI:10.1353/anq.2021.0046
Edyta Roszko
{"title":"Navigating Seas, Markets, and Sovereignties: Fishers and Occupational Slippage in the South China Sea","authors":"Edyta Roszko","doi":"10.1353/anq.2021.0046","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT:Oceans have always been arenas of crime, drugs and human trafficking, and poaching. When such violations occur on fishing boats, they fall under the rubric of \"fisheries crime.\" Political scientists and economists have tended to assume that these criminal fishers simply abandon their legal occupation and take up illegal practices, labelled \"transnational organized fisheries crime\" by the United Nations. On the other hand, some scholars have also argued that subsidized and militarized fishers in the South China Sea are simply acting as instruments of their states' geopolitical agendas, responding to regulations, non-enforcement of regulations, and incentives. Such present-centric approaches both obscure the modalities of fishers' embodied skills and knowledge and their motivations, and downplay the inter-ethnic networks that connected different fishers beyond state territories and localized fishing grounds in past and present. Charting the spike in maritime trespass in (and out of) the South China Sea, this article combines ethnography and historiography to show how fishers move in and out of legal and illegal, state and non-state categories of fisher, poacher, trader, smuggler, and militia. I propose the concept of occupational slippage as a way of going beyond the fiction of fishing as mono-occupational and theorizing the realities of fishers as mobile maritime actors who enact and conceal multiple—simultaneous and consecutive—livelihood strategies while navigating not just seas, but also markets and territorial sovereignties. Thus, I argue that the fishers' practices reflect wider interconnections between modern, state-supported, and technology-driven fisheries with older pre-nation-state patterns of mobility and knowledge accumulated through generations, producing new forms of versatility that operate under the states' radars.","PeriodicalId":51536,"journal":{"name":"Anthropological Quarterly","volume":"94 1","pages":"639 - 668"},"PeriodicalIF":0.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-01-22","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"4","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Anthropological Quarterly","FirstCategoryId":"90","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1353/anq.2021.0046","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"社会学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q3","JCRName":"ANTHROPOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 4

Abstract

ABSTRACT:Oceans have always been arenas of crime, drugs and human trafficking, and poaching. When such violations occur on fishing boats, they fall under the rubric of "fisheries crime." Political scientists and economists have tended to assume that these criminal fishers simply abandon their legal occupation and take up illegal practices, labelled "transnational organized fisheries crime" by the United Nations. On the other hand, some scholars have also argued that subsidized and militarized fishers in the South China Sea are simply acting as instruments of their states' geopolitical agendas, responding to regulations, non-enforcement of regulations, and incentives. Such present-centric approaches both obscure the modalities of fishers' embodied skills and knowledge and their motivations, and downplay the inter-ethnic networks that connected different fishers beyond state territories and localized fishing grounds in past and present. Charting the spike in maritime trespass in (and out of) the South China Sea, this article combines ethnography and historiography to show how fishers move in and out of legal and illegal, state and non-state categories of fisher, poacher, trader, smuggler, and militia. I propose the concept of occupational slippage as a way of going beyond the fiction of fishing as mono-occupational and theorizing the realities of fishers as mobile maritime actors who enact and conceal multiple—simultaneous and consecutive—livelihood strategies while navigating not just seas, but also markets and territorial sovereignties. Thus, I argue that the fishers' practices reflect wider interconnections between modern, state-supported, and technology-driven fisheries with older pre-nation-state patterns of mobility and knowledge accumulated through generations, producing new forms of versatility that operate under the states' radars.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
航海、市场和主权:南海的渔民和职业滑坡
摘要:海洋一直是犯罪、毒品、人口贩运和偷猎的场所。在渔船上发生的这种违法行为属于“渔业犯罪”。政治学家和经济学家倾向于认为,这些犯罪渔民只是放弃他们的合法职业,从事被联合国称为“跨国有组织渔业犯罪”的非法活动。另一方面,一些学者也认为,在南中国海获得补贴和军事化的渔民只是充当其国家地缘政治议程的工具,对法规、不执行法规和激励措施做出回应。这种以现在为中心的方法既模糊了渔民所体现的技能和知识的形式及其动机,又淡化了过去和现在在国家领土和地方渔场之外连接不同渔民的种族间网络。这篇文章结合了民族志和历史学,描绘了南海海域非法越界的高峰,展示了渔民如何进出合法和非法、国家和非国家类别的渔民、偷猎者、贸易商、走私者和民兵。我提出了职业滑动的概念,作为一种超越单一职业捕鱼的虚构的方式,并将渔民作为移动的海上行动者的现实理论化,他们不仅在海上航行,而且在市场和领土主权上航行,制定和隐藏多重同时和连续的生计策略。因此,我认为渔民的做法反映了现代、国家支持和技术驱动的渔业与古老的、前民族国家的流动模式和几代人积累的知识之间更广泛的相互联系,产生了在国家雷达下运作的新形式的多用途性。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
1.60
自引率
11.10%
发文量
30
期刊介绍: Since 1921, Anthropological Quarterly has published scholarly articles, review articles, book reviews, and lists of recently published books in all areas of sociocultural anthropology. Its goal is the rapid dissemination of articles that blend precision with humanism, and scrupulous analysis with meticulous description.
期刊最新文献
The Copy Generic: How the Nonspecific Makes our Social Worlds by Scott MacLochlainn (review) Whetū Mārama/Bright Star dir Toby Mills and Aileen O’Sullivan (review) Screen Media, Technological Innovation and the State in Nigeria Language In Culture: Lectures on the Social Semiotics of Language by Michael Silverstein (review) Crazy, Stupid, Lying, Traitors: Eritrean Politics and Extreme Speech Online
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1