Finding a fit between CXO’s experience and AI usage in CXO decision-making: evidence from knowledge-intensive professional service firms

IF 3.9 3区 管理学 Q2 BUSINESS Journal of Service Theory and Practice Pub Date : 2023-02-07 DOI:10.1108/jstp-06-2022-0134
Poojitha Kondapaka, Sayantan Khanra, A. Malik, Munezasultana M. Kagzi, Kannan Hemachandran
{"title":"Finding a fit between CXO’s experience and AI usage in CXO decision-making: evidence from knowledge-intensive professional service firms","authors":"Poojitha Kondapaka, Sayantan Khanra, A. Malik, Munezasultana M. Kagzi, Kannan Hemachandran","doi":"10.1108/jstp-06-2022-0134","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"PurposeArtificial intelligence (AI) applications’ usage in Chief Officers’ (CXOs’) decision-making is a topic of current research interest. A fundamental dilemma is carefully planning an effective combination of a CXO’s professional experiences and AI applications’ decision-making responsibility. However, the existing literature fails to specify the value of co-creation of AI applications and the human experience in managerial decision-making. To address this gap in the literature, the authors’ examine how an ideal cognitive-technology fit can be created between human experiences and AI-based solutions at CXO-level decision-making using the theoretical lens of the Service-Dominant Logic.Design/methodology/approachThe authors’ employed a grounded theory approach and conducted a focus group discussion with seven participants to shed light on the factors that may balance AI applications’ usage and CXOs’ experience in making business decisions. This was followed by 21 in-depth interviews with employees from knowledge-intensive professional service firms to validate the findings further of a new phenomenon. Further, given the newness of the phenomenon, this approach allowed researchers a retrospective and real-time understanding of interviewees’ experiences of the phenomenon under consideration.FindingsThe advantages and constraints of both CXOs’ experiences and AI applications deserve due consideration for successfully implementing technology in knowledge-intensive professional service organizations.Research limitations/implicationsThis study may appeal to researchers and practitioners interested in the future of decision-making, as the authors’ study findings advocate for balancing CXO’s expertise and the use of AI in decision-making.Originality/valueBased on the preliminary findings, the authors developed a theoretical framework to understand the factors that govern AI implementation in an organization and how a competitive strategy may emerge from value co-created by AI applications and CXOs’ experience, particularly in knowledge-intensive professional service firms.","PeriodicalId":47021,"journal":{"name":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":3.9000,"publicationDate":"2023-02-07","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"5","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Journal of Service Theory and Practice","FirstCategoryId":"91","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1108/jstp-06-2022-0134","RegionNum":3,"RegionCategory":"管理学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q2","JCRName":"BUSINESS","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 5

Abstract

PurposeArtificial intelligence (AI) applications’ usage in Chief Officers’ (CXOs’) decision-making is a topic of current research interest. A fundamental dilemma is carefully planning an effective combination of a CXO’s professional experiences and AI applications’ decision-making responsibility. However, the existing literature fails to specify the value of co-creation of AI applications and the human experience in managerial decision-making. To address this gap in the literature, the authors’ examine how an ideal cognitive-technology fit can be created between human experiences and AI-based solutions at CXO-level decision-making using the theoretical lens of the Service-Dominant Logic.Design/methodology/approachThe authors’ employed a grounded theory approach and conducted a focus group discussion with seven participants to shed light on the factors that may balance AI applications’ usage and CXOs’ experience in making business decisions. This was followed by 21 in-depth interviews with employees from knowledge-intensive professional service firms to validate the findings further of a new phenomenon. Further, given the newness of the phenomenon, this approach allowed researchers a retrospective and real-time understanding of interviewees’ experiences of the phenomenon under consideration.FindingsThe advantages and constraints of both CXOs’ experiences and AI applications deserve due consideration for successfully implementing technology in knowledge-intensive professional service organizations.Research limitations/implicationsThis study may appeal to researchers and practitioners interested in the future of decision-making, as the authors’ study findings advocate for balancing CXO’s expertise and the use of AI in decision-making.Originality/valueBased on the preliminary findings, the authors developed a theoretical framework to understand the factors that govern AI implementation in an organization and how a competitive strategy may emerge from value co-created by AI applications and CXOs’ experience, particularly in knowledge-intensive professional service firms.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
在CXO决策中寻找CXO经验和人工智能使用之间的契合点:来自知识密集型专业服务公司的证据
人工智能(AI)应用程序在首席执行官(CXOs)决策中的应用是当前研究兴趣的一个主题。一个根本的难题是,如何将CXO的专业经验和人工智能应用的决策责任有效地结合起来。然而,现有文献未能明确指出人工智能应用程序共同创造的价值以及人类在管理决策中的经验。为了解决文献中的这一差距,作者研究了如何在人类经验和基于ai的解决方案之间创建理想的认知技术匹配,并使用服务主导逻辑的理论视角来进行cxo级决策。设计/方法/方法作者采用了基于理论的方法,并与七名参与者进行了焦点小组讨论,以阐明可能平衡人工智能应用程序使用和cxo在制定业务决策方面的经验的因素。随后,我们对来自知识密集型专业服务公司的员工进行了21次深度访谈,以进一步验证这一新现象的发现。此外,考虑到这种现象的新颖性,这种方法使研究人员能够回顾和实时地了解受访者对所考虑的现象的经历。在知识密集型专业服务机构成功实施技术时,cxo的经验和人工智能应用的优势和制约因素值得充分考虑。本研究可能会吸引对未来决策感兴趣的研究人员和实践者,因为作者的研究结果主张在决策中平衡CXO的专业知识和人工智能的使用。原创性/价值基于初步发现,作者开发了一个理论框架,以理解在组织中控制人工智能实施的因素,以及人工智能应用和cxo经验共同创造的价值如何产生竞争战略,特别是在知识密集型专业服务公司。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
CiteScore
8.00
自引率
15.20%
发文量
29
期刊介绍: Formerly known as Managing Service Quality – Impact Factor: 1.286 (2015) – the Journal of Service Theory and Practice (JSTP) aims to publish research in the field of service management that not only makes a theoretical contribution to the service literature, but also scrutinizes and helps improve industry practices by offering specific recommendations and action plans to practitioners. Recognizing the importance of the service sector across the globe, the journal encourages submissions from and/or studying issues from around the world. JSTP gives prominence to research based on real world data, be it quantitative or qualitative. The journal also encourages the submission of strong conceptual and theoretical papers that make a substantive contribution to the scholarly literature in service management. JSTP publishes double-blind peer reviewed papers and encourages submissions from both academics and practitioners. The changing social structures and values, as well as new developments in economic, political, and technological fields are creating sea-changes in the philosophy, strategic aims, operational practices, and structures of many organizations. These changes are particularly relevant to the service sector, as public demand for high standards increases, and organizations fight for both market share and public credibility. The journal specifically addresses solutions to these challenges from a global, multi-cultural, and multi-disciplinary perspective.
期刊最新文献
Does employee intervention encourage or discourage the spread of dysfunctional customer behavior? Determinants of customer buying behaviour in omnichannel retailing: a systematic literature review and future research directions Unlocking emotional labor: how organizational control systems shape frontline service employees’ emotional labor The edifying body: the role of embodied practices in the social production of servicescapes Occupational stress as a mediator between organisational intelligence traits and digital government service quality: a triangulation design approach
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1