Achieving Optimal Central Venous Catheter Position: Evaluation of Radiographic Landmarks for Accuracy and Inter-observer Reliability in Locating the Cavoatrial Junction

IF 0.2 4区 医学 Q4 RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING Hong Kong Journal of Radiology Pub Date : 2022-12-23 DOI:10.12809/hkjr2217382
Kw So, HL Tsui, Sm Yu, C. Suen, Cw Choi, Py Chu, J. Chan
{"title":"Achieving Optimal Central Venous Catheter Position: Evaluation of Radiographic Landmarks for Accuracy and Inter-observer Reliability in Locating the Cavoatrial Junction","authors":"Kw So, HL Tsui, Sm Yu, C. Suen, Cw Choi, Py Chu, J. Chan","doi":"10.12809/hkjr2217382","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"Objective: We sought to compare three popular radiographic landmarks for their accuracy and inter-observer reliability in determination of the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) by analysing the anteroposterior scout and electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) images. Methods: CTA image data of 148 patients were assessed. The position of the CAJ defined by CTA was regarded as the gold standard. The median vertical distance between the CAJ and three radiographic landmarks (two vertebral body units [vertebrae plus discs] below the carina, the superior aspect of the right heart border, and the intersection of the bronchus intermedius with the right heart border) were assessed and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. For inter-observer reliability between two radiologists, each with at least 4 years of experience, intra-class correlation (ICC) was analysed. Results: The median vertical distances between the CAJ and two vertebral body units below the carina, the superior aspect of the right heart border, and the intersection of the inferior wall of the bronchus intermedius with the right heart border were 5.1 mm (0-24.6), 10.2 mm (1-45.2) and 9.8 mm (0.8-45.8), respectively. The radiographic landmark of two vertebral body units below the carina provided the closest estimation of the CAJ (p < 0.001). It also demonstrated higher ICC (0.931, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.905-0.950) than the other two (0.833, 95% CI=0.768-0.880 and 0.860, 95% CI=0.805-0.899, respectively). Conclusion: Among the three popular radiographic landmarks for the CAJ, we found that a point two vertebral body units below the carina provided the most accurate estimate of CAJ location.","PeriodicalId":41549,"journal":{"name":"Hong Kong Journal of Radiology","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.2000,"publicationDate":"2022-12-23","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Hong Kong Journal of Radiology","FirstCategoryId":"3","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.12809/hkjr2217382","RegionNum":4,"RegionCategory":"医学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"Q4","JCRName":"RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

Objective: We sought to compare three popular radiographic landmarks for their accuracy and inter-observer reliability in determination of the cavoatrial junction (CAJ) by analysing the anteroposterior scout and electrocardiogram-gated coronary computed tomographic angiography (CTA) images. Methods: CTA image data of 148 patients were assessed. The position of the CAJ defined by CTA was regarded as the gold standard. The median vertical distance between the CAJ and three radiographic landmarks (two vertebral body units [vertebrae plus discs] below the carina, the superior aspect of the right heart border, and the intersection of the bronchus intermedius with the right heart border) were assessed and compared using the Kruskal–Wallis test. For inter-observer reliability between two radiologists, each with at least 4 years of experience, intra-class correlation (ICC) was analysed. Results: The median vertical distances between the CAJ and two vertebral body units below the carina, the superior aspect of the right heart border, and the intersection of the inferior wall of the bronchus intermedius with the right heart border were 5.1 mm (0-24.6), 10.2 mm (1-45.2) and 9.8 mm (0.8-45.8), respectively. The radiographic landmark of two vertebral body units below the carina provided the closest estimation of the CAJ (p < 0.001). It also demonstrated higher ICC (0.931, 95% confidence interval [CI]=0.905-0.950) than the other two (0.833, 95% CI=0.768-0.880 and 0.860, 95% CI=0.805-0.899, respectively). Conclusion: Among the three popular radiographic landmarks for the CAJ, we found that a point two vertebral body units below the carina provided the most accurate estimate of CAJ location.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
实现最佳中心静脉导管位置:评价定位腔房连接处的准确性和观察者间可靠性的影像学标志
目的:通过分析前后定位和心电图门控冠状动脉计算机断层造影(CTA)图像,我们试图比较三种常用的放射学标志在确定腔交界处(CAJ)方面的准确性和观察者间的可靠性。方法:对148例患者的CTA图像资料进行分析。CTA定义的CAJ的位置被视为金标准。使用Kruskal–Wallis检验评估并比较CAJ和三个放射学标志(隆突下方的两个椎体单元[椎骨加椎间盘]、右心边界的上侧面以及中间支气管与右心边界相交处)之间的中位垂直距离。对于两名具有至少4年经验的放射科医生之间的观察者间可靠性,分析了类内相关性(ICC)。结果:CAJ与隆突下方的两个椎体单元、右心边界的上侧面以及中间支气管下壁与右心边界相交处之间的中位垂直距离分别为5.1mm(0-24.6)、10.2mm(1-45.2)和9.8mm(0.8-45.8)。隆突下方两个椎体单位的放射学标志提供了最接近CAJ的估计(p<0.001)。它还显示出比其他两个(分别为0.833,95%可信区间=0.765-0.950和0.860,95%可信可信区间=0.805-0.899)更高的ICC(0.931,95%置信区间[CI]=0.905-0.950)。结论:在CAJ的三个常见影像学标志中,我们发现隆突下两个椎体单位的一个点可以最准确地估计CAJ的位置。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology
Hong Kong Journal of Radiology RADIOLOGY, NUCLEAR MEDICINE & MEDICAL IMAGING-
CiteScore
0.30
自引率
0.00%
发文量
47
期刊最新文献
Optimising Risk-based Breast Cancer Screening in Hong Kong Effects of Different Liver Diseases on Metabolic Reference in 18F-Fluorodeoxyglucose Positron Emission Tomography/Computed Tomography Breast Ductography: A Hidden Diagnostic Gem for Patients with Abnormal Nipple Discharge Sporadic Pulmonary Arteriovenous Malformation with a History of Stroke/Cerebrovascular Ischaemia Successfully Treated with Coil Embolisation: Two Case Reports Kaposi Sarcoma of the Ankle Complicated by Emphysematous Osteomyelitis: A Case Report
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1