Decolonising the environment through African epistemologies

Y. Woldeyes, Tekletsadik Belachew
{"title":"Decolonising the environment through African epistemologies","authors":"Y. Woldeyes, Tekletsadik Belachew","doi":"10.15446/GA.V24NSUPL1.91881","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"This paper examines African epistemologies of the environment as a place-based perspective that regards nature as having its inherent value, personhood, and agency. It presents the African way of relating with or living in the environment as a way of becoming one with nature beyond the discourse of the Anthropocene and environmental change. In particular, we will take African epistemological perspectives from Southern and Eastern Africa, the notions of Ubuntu and Tabot, to reflect on how the environment is traditionally perceived as sacred and part of a living community. The paper also considers how African indigenous ways of knowing and becoming one with nature have been supplanted through epistemic violence, the imposition of western views of the environment over African worldviews through systems and institutions that exclude or exploit local knowledges. Using Ethiopia as a case study, the paper demonstrates how epistemic violence is enacted by excluding indigenous knowledges of the environment from education and disseminating Eurocentric views of the environment. It shall show how the collecting and hording of Ethiopian manuscripts in western institutions has contributed to this loss of indigenous environmental knowledge. Finally, we will examine the importance of African perspectives to decolonise our ways of knowing and relating with the environment, and offer critical insights on how African epistemologies could be used to build a future that is decolonised and sustainable.","PeriodicalId":30434,"journal":{"name":"Gestion y Ambiente","volume":" ","pages":""},"PeriodicalIF":0.0000,"publicationDate":"2021-07-10","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"0","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"Gestion y Ambiente","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.15446/GA.V24NSUPL1.91881","RegionNum":0,"RegionCategory":null,"ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"","JCRName":"","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 0

Abstract

This paper examines African epistemologies of the environment as a place-based perspective that regards nature as having its inherent value, personhood, and agency. It presents the African way of relating with or living in the environment as a way of becoming one with nature beyond the discourse of the Anthropocene and environmental change. In particular, we will take African epistemological perspectives from Southern and Eastern Africa, the notions of Ubuntu and Tabot, to reflect on how the environment is traditionally perceived as sacred and part of a living community. The paper also considers how African indigenous ways of knowing and becoming one with nature have been supplanted through epistemic violence, the imposition of western views of the environment over African worldviews through systems and institutions that exclude or exploit local knowledges. Using Ethiopia as a case study, the paper demonstrates how epistemic violence is enacted by excluding indigenous knowledges of the environment from education and disseminating Eurocentric views of the environment. It shall show how the collecting and hording of Ethiopian manuscripts in western institutions has contributed to this loss of indigenous environmental knowledge. Finally, we will examine the importance of African perspectives to decolonise our ways of knowing and relating with the environment, and offer critical insights on how African epistemologies could be used to build a future that is decolonised and sustainable.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
通过非洲认识论实现环境非殖民化
本文考察了非洲认识论的环境作为一个基于地点的观点,认为自然具有其固有的价值,人格和机构。它展示了非洲人与环境联系或生活在环境中的方式,作为一种与自然融为一体的方式,超越了人类世和环境变化的话语。特别是,我们将从非洲南部和东部的认识论角度,乌班图和塔伯特的概念,来反思传统上环境是如何被视为神圣的,是一个活生生的社区的一部分。这篇论文还考虑了非洲土著认识自然和与自然融为一体的方式是如何被认知暴力所取代的,通过排除或利用当地知识的系统和机构,西方的环境观点强加于非洲的世界观。以埃塞俄比亚为例,本文展示了如何通过将土著环境知识排除在教育之外并传播欧洲中心主义的环境观点来实施认知暴力。它将表明,在西方机构中收集和保存埃塞俄比亚手稿是如何导致土著环境知识的流失的。最后,我们将研究非洲视角对我们认识和与环境相关的方式去殖民化的重要性,并就如何利用非洲认识论来建立一个非殖民化和可持续的未来提供重要见解。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
自引率
0.00%
发文量
7
审稿时长
37 weeks
期刊最新文献
Metodologías participativas en la elaboración de estrategias de monitoreo comunitario de cantidad de agua para su gestión. Estudio de caso: Acueducto Comunitario Asoporquera, vereda Mochuelo Alto, Bogotá, DC Un enfoque desde la sustentabilidad: análisis de ciclo de vida como herramienta para la toma de decisiones en el desarrollo de proyectos hidroeléctricos en Colombia Energías comunitarias para la transición justa Política y emisiones de Gases de Efecto Invernadero: el caso de Hidrosogamoso como Mecanismo de Desarrollo Limpio Participación ciudadana y conflictos ambientales en el Proyecto Hidroeléctrico Montebonito, Caldas
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:604180095
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1