Recognising inequality: ableism in Egyptological approaches to disability and bodily differences

IF 1.8 2区 历史学 0 ARCHAEOLOGY WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY Pub Date : 2022-08-08 DOI:10.1080/00438243.2023.2170911
H. Vogel, R. Power
{"title":"Recognising inequality: ableism in Egyptological approaches to disability and bodily differences","authors":"H. Vogel, R. Power","doi":"10.1080/00438243.2023.2170911","DOIUrl":null,"url":null,"abstract":"ABSTRACT This paper employs a historiographical approach to review the allied fields of Egyptology and Egyptian Archaeology in relation to studies of disability and bodily differences in ancient Egypt. We incorporate critical disability studies and embodiment theories to consider whether ableism is prevalent across these disciplines. The focus of this study has been inverted from ‘identifying’ disability. Instead our primary driving question is: are Egyptological approaches to bodily differences and disabilities contributing to a production and maintenance of ableism in Egyptology? Here we first identify ableist narratives within numerous methodologies highlighting the need to reconsider existing approaches, terminologies, models, and assumptions regarding studies of disability in the ancient past. We then challenge readers to recognise ableism as a form of inequality in the existing scholarship, and in turn, call for better awareness of assumptions relating to bodily norms, terminologies, and inclusivity in ancient world studies.","PeriodicalId":47942,"journal":{"name":"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY","volume":"54 1","pages":"502 - 515"},"PeriodicalIF":1.8000,"publicationDate":"2022-08-08","publicationTypes":"Journal Article","fieldsOfStudy":null,"isOpenAccess":false,"openAccessPdf":"","citationCount":"1","resultStr":null,"platform":"Semanticscholar","paperid":null,"PeriodicalName":"WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY","FirstCategoryId":"1085","ListUrlMain":"https://doi.org/10.1080/00438243.2023.2170911","RegionNum":2,"RegionCategory":"历史学","ArticlePicture":[],"TitleCN":null,"AbstractTextCN":null,"PMCID":null,"EPubDate":"","PubModel":"","JCR":"0","JCRName":"ARCHAEOLOGY","Score":null,"Total":0}
引用次数: 1

Abstract

ABSTRACT This paper employs a historiographical approach to review the allied fields of Egyptology and Egyptian Archaeology in relation to studies of disability and bodily differences in ancient Egypt. We incorporate critical disability studies and embodiment theories to consider whether ableism is prevalent across these disciplines. The focus of this study has been inverted from ‘identifying’ disability. Instead our primary driving question is: are Egyptological approaches to bodily differences and disabilities contributing to a production and maintenance of ableism in Egyptology? Here we first identify ableist narratives within numerous methodologies highlighting the need to reconsider existing approaches, terminologies, models, and assumptions regarding studies of disability in the ancient past. We then challenge readers to recognise ableism as a form of inequality in the existing scholarship, and in turn, call for better awareness of assumptions relating to bodily norms, terminologies, and inclusivity in ancient world studies.
查看原文
分享 分享
微信好友 朋友圈 QQ好友 复制链接
本刊更多论文
认识不平等:埃及学中对残疾和身体差异的残疾歧视
本文采用史学方法来回顾埃及学和埃及考古学的相关领域,涉及古埃及的残疾和身体差异的研究。我们结合关键的残疾研究和具体化理论来考虑残疾歧视是否在这些学科中普遍存在。这项研究的重点已经从“识别”残疾倒置了。相反,我们的主要问题是:埃及学对身体差异和残疾的研究是否导致了埃及学中残疾歧视的产生和维持?在这里,我们首先在许多方法中识别出残疾主义者的叙述,强调需要重新考虑古代关于残疾研究的现有方法、术语、模型和假设。然后,我们要求读者认识到,在现有的学术研究中,残疾歧视是一种不平等的形式,反过来,我们呼吁读者更好地意识到古代世界研究中与身体规范、术语和包容性有关的假设。
本文章由计算机程序翻译,如有差异,请以英文原文为准。
求助全文
约1分钟内获得全文 去求助
来源期刊
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY
WORLD ARCHAEOLOGY ARCHAEOLOGY-
CiteScore
2.60
自引率
0.00%
发文量
32
期刊介绍: World Archaeology was established specifically to deal with archaeology on a world-wide multiperiod basis. Thirty years after it was founded it remains a leader in its field. The first three of the year"s quarterly issues are each dedicated to a particular theme of current interest. The fourth issue, Debates in World Archaeology, is a forum for debate, discussion and comment. All papers adopt a broad comparative approach, looking at important issues on a global scale. The members of the editorial board and the advisory board represent a wide range of interests and expertise and this ensures that the papers published in World Archaeology cover a wide variety of subject areas.
期刊最新文献
Lower Paleolithic Stone-Animal ontologies: stone scrapers as mediators between early humans and their preferred prey Projectile points, dangers and Amerindian ontologies at eastern Catamarca (Argentina) during the first millennium CE Deaths at the heart of the state: incarcerating working-class youth at Ferme Neuve of Les Douaires, France Archaeology and a case of genocide: the ‘indigenous prisons’ of Minas Gerais, Brazil Towards a political ecology of piracy in the Age of Sail
×
引用
GB/T 7714-2015
复制
MLA
复制
APA
复制
导出至
BibTeX EndNote RefMan NoteFirst NoteExpress
×
×
提示
您的信息不完整,为了账户安全,请先补充。
现在去补充
×
提示
您因"违规操作"
具体请查看互助需知
我知道了
×
提示
现在去查看 取消
×
提示
确定
0
微信
客服QQ
Book学术公众号 扫码关注我们
反馈
×
意见反馈
请填写您的意见或建议
请填写您的手机或邮箱
已复制链接
已复制链接
快去分享给好友吧!
我知道了
×
扫码分享
扫码分享
Book学术官方微信
Book学术文献互助
Book学术文献互助群
群 号:481959085
Book学术
文献互助 智能选刊 最新文献 互助须知 联系我们:info@booksci.cn
Book学术提供免费学术资源搜索服务,方便国内外学者检索中英文文献。致力于提供最便捷和优质的服务体验。
Copyright © 2023 Book学术 All rights reserved.
ghs 京公网安备 11010802042870号 京ICP备2023020795号-1